Posted on 06/10/2024 12:06:53 AM PDT by Drago
"A cancer organization said that it recognized readers could be offended by the term cervix and explained that the term "front hole" would be more inclusive to men who believe they are women"... ..."The Canadian Cancer Society joins the ranks of cervical cancer charity Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust from the United Kingdom, which deemed the vagina as a "bonus hole" in 2023 in an effort to not upset men who believe they are women."
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
Catering to whackos. Scared to death someone (or something) would be “offended”. These people need something, what that is I don’t know, but renaming everything is dumber than setting your farts on fire.
There is the No-No hole. Teach your children about that. Exit only! Like teaching them about not putting anything in your ear.
“ Can’t wait for the testicular cancer renaming...”
Spare parts.
I did look, and certainly not this morning.
(When did Western society become completely bat**** crazy?)
Was it for speaking the truth?
Using he/she pronouns properly?
Calling out those who call bad good and good bad? P>It's no longer mind blowing to see revelations coming true.
for me anyway
If the word “cervix” is offensive to you while you’re proudly wearing your p-hat… you might be a Democrat.
Progressives create a pseudo reality so that you do not have a grounding in reality
Responding to the pseudo reality puts you in their pseudo reality, which means you lose the ability to defend your real issues in real terms.
When one responses to this nonsense on their terms, you make it “real”
...Mock them, poke fun at them, tell them you’re not playing their silly word games. Then walk away. Never, ever go tit-for tat with them...
Exactly, well said
But that still won’t be a cervix, now, will it? Woman have bath vaginas and cervixes. Men do not have these.
Not sure how our civilization survives, when the smartest people have become this stupid.
Unbelievable....
I give up.
What’s the “bonus hole?”
I mean - what’s the “bonus?”
Dangling appendage.
I’m not surprised nor should most be.
Anyone group that would condone mutilation to create imaginary males would believe anything.
Warning, graphic image of woman’s body after Phalloplasty or as the woke say “male confirming surgery”.
https://images.app.goo.gl/jaTNkN23EHBuwVk99
One of the floats in Boston's "gay pride" parade featured a photo of the "bonus hole" last Saturday..
But one of the first thoughts that comes to my mind when considering "gender affirming surgery" is that there were "doctors" in Europe in the mid to late 1940s who were executed for doing the very same things to people in Germany,Poland and elsewhere.
This would be a good time for donors to rescind their gifts and cite this as the reason why. The only way people change their behavior is if you kick them in the pocketbook.
This kind of language comes ultimately from a mindset that views other people primarily as sex toys. The cultural reservoir for that kind of thinking and talking has always been the hypersexualized and usually quasi-underground world of fully unleased male homesexuality, where the norm is extreme promiscuity. The sexual revolution has always involved a strong element of normalizing and popularizing male homosexual pathologies. It’s not accidental that homosexuality is having a cultural moment as rates of marriage and childbearing are plummeting. To the revolutionaries, sex is all about taking and using, never giving and sharing, and children have all but disappeared from the picture because raising children is best done in families built to last. That sort of thing has no place at the orgy.
Using their language my pretendaboy neighbor thinks I’m a Rear Hole because I was born without a Front Hole and they were.
The language of five year olds. Front hole.
What is the male part called? A pointer thing?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.