Posted on 06/04/2024 7:22:42 AM PDT by bitt
Tucker Carlson
Nothing is ever about our safety. This country and the world only changes when we eliminate The CIA
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZI7zaiNq8Z9Q/
Biden has been given a pass even though the report states he had, shared, and misused secret documents. We have a right to know just how addled his brain really is.
Wait, wait, wait. Is this recording an AI generated fake, or is it real and they’re just using it to justify censorship of free speech?
Flashback: Obama Offered Jeremiah Wright Hush Money During 2008 Campaign
By MATT MARGOLIS | 3:22 PM ON JUNE 03, 2024, pjmedia.com
According to the radical left, a payment to silence someone from making potentially damaging statements to influence the outcome of a presidential election is a serious crime. A felony at that. That’s the entirely hocus-pocus legal theory behind Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case against Donald Trump that resulted in a conviction. In that case, Barack Obama ought to be charged with a similar crime.
That’s right, Obama also offered hush money to someone specifically to influence the 2008 election. The media never talked about it, and you can bet they’d have some amusing and laughable explanation for why what Obama did was “different.” But the fact is that Obama has been accused of offering money to his former pastor, Jeremiah Wright, to buy his silence during the 2008 presidential election.
As you may recall, Wright’s inflammatory, anti-American rhetoric was a huge problem for Obama during his first presidential campaign, and he tried to shut Wright up to save his campaign — which the prominent leftist legal scholars of the day call corruptly influencing an election.
Edward Klein broke the story in the New York Post on May 13, 2012, revealing that Obama’s camp made a hush offer to Wright during the 2008 campaign. The deal involved a hefty sum of $150,000 and was made through an intermediary who was a close friend of Obama’s — and Obama himself even stepped in, urging Wright to keep quiet for the sake of his presidential campaign.
“Man, the media ate me alive,” Wright told Klein. “After the media went ballistic on me, I received an e-mail offering me money not to preach at all until the November presidential election.”
snip
Just two answers to this either Biden is addled and should be removed from office, or he has committed crimes much more serious then those Trump has been accused ofand should be put on trial for.
pjmedia.com
Biden Admin Tampered With Evidence, Altered Biden’s Hur Interview Transcript
By MATT MARGOLIS | 1:55 PM ON JUNE 03, 2024, pjmedia.com
The Biden Justice Department claims that the reason it doesn’t want to release the audio of Joe Biden’s interview with special counsel Robert Hur is because it’s worried about AI deepfakes.
“Disclosure of that record is unwarranted,” the DOJ said in a court filing. “Release of the audio recording would threaten critical law enforcement interests by chilling the potential cooperation of witnesses in current and future sensitive investigations. In addition, disclosure would constitute a significant invasion of privacy. ... These privacy harms are amplified by the threat of malicious manipulation of audio files that has recently become much more acute.”
That sounds suspect, don’t you think? So what is the real reason? Perhaps it’s because the White House tampered with evidence.
According to Judicial Watch, the White House has admitted that it manipulated the public transcript of Biden’s interview with special counsel Robert Hur to make Biden appear more mentally competent.
Judicial Watch announced that the White House admitted in a federal court that the transcript of President Joe Biden’s testimony to Special Counsel Robert Hur is not accurate and is missing “filler words (such as ‘um’ or ‘uh’)” and words that “may have been repeated when spoken (such as ‘I, I’ or ‘and, and’)” which were sometimes “only listed a single time in the transcripts.”
Here’s what the DOJ filing says: 14. The interview transcripts are accurate transcriptions of the words of the interview contained in the audio recording, except for minor instances such as the use of filler words (such as “um” or “uh”) when speaking that are not always reflected on the transcripts, or when words may have been repeated when spoken (such as “I, I” or “and, and”) but sometimes was only listed a single time in the transcripts. Besides these exceedingly minor differences, based on my simultaneous review of the transcripts while listening to the audio recording, the transcripts accurately capture the words spoken during the interview on the audio recording with no material differences between the audio recording and transcripts. None of the minor differences include any audible substantive exchanges – that is, based on my review, there is no material omission of words be tween the audio recording and transcripts. Special Counsel Hur and FBI personnel who attended the interview and compared the audio recording to the transcripts also informed me of their determination that the transcripts accurately reflect the words spoken on the audio recording aside from the minor instances I described above. Special Counsel Hur emphasized to me that it was important for purposes of his investigation that the interview transcripts be accurate.
The DOJ can claim the differences between the audio and the transcript are “exceedingly minor differences,” but seriously, who do they think they’re fooling?
Link: Is Joe Biden Getting Into Witness Tampering Now?
“Wow. Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuit forced the Biden team to admit what everyone suspected – that the transcript is not accurate and was changed in a way to help Biden,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. “There is nothing ordinary about this, and the transcript inaccuracy issues seem to help Biden’s political campaign needs. We today initiated a new FOIA request on this Biden’s Nixonian tape scandal.”
Now it all makes sense. If you read the Hur transcripts, you likely thought they were damning enough, but how much worse is the audio? It’s no mistake that the Biden administration is so aggressively fighting the release of the audio.
That recording will only be heard once Biden is dead and gone. And the sooner the better for that.
How dare you slander people who are “retarded”.
The Prompt: Google’s AI Suggested Adding Glue To Pizza
and that’s all you need to know about who’s behind this whole thing.
Oh yes, by all means, hide the audio recording of a special counsel’s interview of PINO Drooling Spoon... where he sounds doddling, moronic, forgetful, and decrepit... because someone might make a “deep fake” of it where he sounds doddling, moronic, forgetful, and decrepit!
Any "Deep Fake" could ONLY make the senile incompetent Imbecile Traitor appear smarter and more coherent.
As if there aren’t millions of hours of Biden audio already recorded. He must sound really senile on those tapes.
There must be some really incriminating evidence in those audio recordings that weren’t included in the “transcripts.”
It is totally BS........................
The Deep Truth hurts this regime more than any deep fake could.
It’s why they won’t release the transcript.
The real fear that the DOJ has is that, the Biden recorded interviews will confirm what the general public already knows about Biden and his dementia, and general memory failures.
Hiding the truth will not benefit Biden, and could only make things harder for him in the general election when he has to interact with questioners in campaign debates and in press briefings/conferences. The only way to evade the voters and Americans in general, is to go into hiding again in the White House basement or in his Baltimore residence.
The American people already know how inept Biden is, and the recordings would confirm that, but they’re not necessary when the evidence has been there in the open for many years.
The AP writes deepfake news for the Justice Dept.”
That is exactly what this is. A rancid piece of propaganda to support the lie they used to seal the audio that was the excuse for not charging Biden
We have the transcripts and testimony. The video would be nice but there is ample evidence to bring the same charges against Biden as Trump….. who is going to bring it?
The video is needed because, you know surer than sh*t, that the transcript was altered (to appear more “innocent”, as if) before release. Whole lines of questioning were omitted regarding documents (stolen by FJB while FJB was a Senator and VP), who had access to them and what did they pay the bag man Hunter for access to the documents themselves or the contents thereof.
“i guess “cuz it would make biden look bad” is not a good legal argument.”
Audio of biden looking bad is plentiful and beyond retrievable. The audio doesn’t match the transcript for certain. Hearing it will just uncover another batch of lies. It will be interesting to see if they can AI fix it, and if we can tell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.