Posted on 05/28/2024 5:23:41 PM PDT by george76
Chances are, if you’ve been keeping tabs on the COVID “coverup,: you’ve come across this story that began to unfold in 2022. There was a sudden spike in SIDS cases in Ottawa, Canada, where nine babies died shortly after their mothers received the vaccine. One detective, named Helen Grus, took it upon herself to investigate these incidents. Yet, simply for doing her job and delving into the vaccine’s possible role, she found herself suspended and vilified.
The Ottawa police settled with one of the families who felt their privacy was breached, simply because a detective was determined to get to the bottom of their baby’s death, and that’s when Grus was suspended and her life was turned upside down.
CTV News:
Grus allegedly contacted the deceased baby’s father on Jan. 30, 2022 to ask about the mother’s COVID-19 vaccination status, according to police documents.
After a complaint was filed against Grus with OPS, Grus was suspended with pay on Feb. 4, 2022.
Lawrence Greenspon, the family’s lawyer, said the case was settled this week for an undisclosed amount.
“Parents are not put on this earth to bury their children,” he told CTV News Ottawa.
“When a tragedy happens, the family’s privacy must be respected.”
Greenspon said the family would like to thank the Ottawa Police Service for acknowledging their grief and recognizing the importance of privacy.
Now, she’s sharing her story, exposing the depths of the biased and dystopian ‘jab coverup.’ Why on earth wouldn’t we want to uncover any potential harm caused by this vaccine? When did people become such mindless, spineless jellyfish that they take the government’s word as gospel? It’s alarming to witness this transformation, especially at a time when our government and so-called ‘experts’ are so widely distrusted and disliked.
...
Some of the SIDS and COVID vaccine data that is emerging is deeply concerning.
William Makis:
NEW ARTICLE: Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Data Shows Links Between Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) – 749 deaths liked to Hib (Haemophilus influenzae Type b) and 51% were recorded as “SIDS” on AUTOPSY
A study published in 2015 by CDC scientists (first author Pedro Moro, Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA) showed the following:
“VAERS received 29,747 reports after Hib vaccines: 5179 (17%) were serious, including 896 reports of deaths. Median age was 6 months.”
“Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) was the stated cause of death in 384 (51%) of 749 death reports with autopsy/death certificate records”
most common nondeath serious AE categories were neurologic (37%)
However, as we know, PROPAGANDA is always put into the abstract and conclusion of a publication because most doctors don’t read scientific papers – they only read the abstract or conclusion.
So the CDC authors wrote this: “Conclusion: Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns for Hib vaccines.”
SIDS is the 3rd leading cause of death in infants, and the U.S. has one of the highest infant mortality rates in the developed world
I conducted an updated search of Hib (Haemophilus influenzae Type b) deaths in VAERS in infants under age 2.
VAERS has 1881 deaths of babies 0 to 2 years old after Hib Vaccine.
1514 deaths are < 6 months.
Do pediatricians discuss these risks with parents? Mine didn’t.
...
As tough as it’s been for warriors like Helen Grus, her relentless fight is casting more light on this issue. Hopefully, thanks to her efforts and those of others like her, we will find the answers we all deserve and save our children from further pain and suffering.
“SIDS is the 3rd leading cause of death in infants, and the U.S. has one of the highest infant mortality rates in the developed world.”
I have read this is because we are able to deliver and care for very I’ll babies who would have died before birth or within 3 days of birth and are not counted as infant deaths.
While I sympathize with the detective’s motivation, she really got out of her lane. The parent who complained felt violated by unwelcome and intrusive “investigation” by a local cop who probably had no training for this kind of thing. I suspect I’d have felt the same way.
And I have read that other countries do not count infant deaths unless they die after a certain age.
In a time of universal deceit...
Nothing to see here.....move along.
I have read the US has the highest number of vaxes and rates for infants...
Vexxationation of the mother+breastfeeding of the baby=?
Hell—just being in the same passenger car more or less regularly with the newly vexxationated (seemingly all of whom were dying to tell everyone who would lidten their vexxationated status) gave unvexxationated This Guy a daily splitting headach (until he started dosing with dandelion root extract).
PING
mark
There was a true crime documentary about “SIDS” and the culprit was the mother was killing her children. The media and doctors invented the name SIDS and couldn’t dare blame the poor mother and chalked it up to genetic factors.... That is until an adopted child died the same way.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marybeth_Tinning
Science is questioning.
Say it slowly, several times.
Science-
Is-
Questioning.
Whether or not a woman is immune to a pathogen has nothing to do with SIDS. SIDS has always killed babies, since long before humans ever thought of even rudimentary forms of vaccination.
Thus, asking whether a bereaved mother had a vaccination prior to her child’s death is completely unnecessary and irrelevant.
The immune system responds pretty much the same way to any vaccine, whether it’s an influenza, measles, tetanus, or coronavirus vaccine. The immune system responds to vaccines the same way it responds to pathogens—except that its response to vaccines is very limited because no real pathogen is present. And, as I already said, the woman’s immune response doesn’t affect her baby (except that she might pass protective antibodies to the baby through the placenta or her milk, helping to protect the baby against deadly pathogens).
Think of it this way: if immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is deadly, then everyone who has had Covid is already dead.
I would disagree, as the article stated there was a spike in SIDS cases in that jurisdiction, when a large number of babies die from the same thing in a short period of time, it should be everyone’s business to want to know why especially a detective.
It’s only logical to start asking questions on commonalities between the babies like vaccine status, hospital of birth or anything they have in common that could explain why so many died of the same thing in such a short period of time
The dead baby’s parents’ actions are very suspicious. What are they hiding?
EC
Thus, asking whether a bereaved mother had a vaccination prior to her child’s death is completely unnecessary and irrelevant.
Because, as you say, 'SIDS has always.....' is no reason to discount the possibility that an additional factor could also cause SIDS. The real question here is motivation for this detective's suspicion. Is/was there an increase in SIDS since the introduction of the Covid-19 'vaccine' or not? Does he have some axe to grind (e.g., in the business of or under the influence of virology/vaccine efforts?)
Almost agree - but let’s not forget that the jabs infiltrated every part of a body - including mother’s milk....
Ping to more nonsense
SIDS is just physicianspeak for "I dunno" -- or, to sound slightly more learned, "idiopathic".
Conveys zero information.
Funny though, you should use this as the basis for a universal declaration; as though there could and must be only one single cause for infant death, and no matter what, it must never ever EVER be even as a passing thought, associated with the clot shots.
...I notice you didn't even pretend to look either at numbers, or VAERS, eitehr before or after the clot shots.
DINGBAT.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.