Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden’s new Title IX revisions are a repulsive attempt to erase biological truth
New York Post ^ | April 22, 2024 | Kirsten Fleming

Posted on 04/22/2024 4:21:59 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Last week, as the country was swept up in Caitlin Clark mania, Joe Biden — or whoever was holding his phone — sent out a pandering tweet, asking for compensation parity in women’s sports.

It was a request meant to celebrate the sisterhood, but had little regard for the financial realities of professional sports.

But days later, the Biden administration announced plans to kneecap lady athletes: introducing sweeping, radical changes to Title IX that would trample on fairness for females in locker rooms, sports and other single-sex spaces. All with absolutely no regard for biological reality.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biden; biology; creepyjoe; realitydeniers; realityphobes; titleix; transgender
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 04/22/2024 4:21:59 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Even WebMD has gone woke. Look at this on their protein page requirements:
Babies need about 10 grams a day.
School-age kids need 19-34 grams a day.
Teens assigned male at birth need up to 52 grams a day.
Teens assigned female at birth need 46 grams a day.
Adults assigned male at birth need about 56 grams a day.
Adults assigned female at birth need about 46 grams a day (71 grams if pregnant or breastfeeding). See anything strange there?

https://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/protein

2 posted on 04/22/2024 4:37:09 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Democrats aren’t fans of any kind of truth, much less biological truth.


3 posted on 04/22/2024 4:39:12 PM PDT by Flag_This (They're lying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

Likely the legal dept that went Woke where many others happily went along.

Biological Male would have been the better descriptor


4 posted on 04/22/2024 4:46:36 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

How is that work?


5 posted on 04/22/2024 4:49:13 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I believe we need a new term to capture the scope of the Democrats war on women.

I suggest we use the term “gendicide”


6 posted on 04/22/2024 4:58:42 PM PDT by PTBAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I'm laughing my @ss off.

In this country's current legal environment, Title IX never had any place in scholastic sports in the first place.

I have yet to have anyone explain to me how women competing in segregated sports leagues is any different than black people using separate restaurants and bathrooms.

#WINNING

7 posted on 04/22/2024 5:09:33 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

Grow up WebMD.


8 posted on 04/22/2024 5:10:47 PM PDT by Vision (Woke is communism and it has no place in America. Election Reform Now! Obama is an evildoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Because the Bible teaches that genderization is a holy concept. Secondly, very few women would be able to earn scholarships if they had to compete against men.

Genderization is one of the big topics of the Bible. Respecting it keeps civilization together.


9 posted on 04/22/2024 5:13:47 PM PDT by Jonty30 (He hunted a mammoth me, just because I said I was hungry. He is such a good friend. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
Interesting. What does the Bible say about women's sports, and athletic scholarships?

Secondly, very few women would be able to earn scholarships if they had to compete against men.

The rational disconnect here is remarkable among conservatives. When women can't compete against men in combat, we tell them they don't belong in combat. But when it comes to any other facet of life where they can't compete, we just fall back on our Bibles and tell them they should compete separately -- like they're Special Olympians?

10 posted on 04/22/2024 5:18:53 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

First of all, in the field, woman can’t compete in war with men. Very few woman can pack 85-120 lbs on their back and march 30 miles. Most other females, to handle a pack would burden their fellow soldiers unfairly enough to compromise a troop’s readiness for combat. That doesn’t mean that there isn’t a role for women in combat, such as drones or supply trucks or other support roles. Just not in the field itself.

The Bible doesn’t talk about specifics and there are a thousand possibilities that you could bring up. Just simply state that you don’t believe the Bible on this point. If you are to abide by the Bible, men and women are genderized and should remain separate in their roles. That doesn’t mean that they can’t play together in non-serious ways, but for men to exercise their masculinity fully they have to be able to be free in their abilities. I don’t want to live in a culture where women can be brutalized because our culture has thrown out the idea that care must be given to women over their greater fragility. I think, if we ended up in the culture that liberals are trying to create, you wouldn’t want to live in it either.

You’re bought into the anti-feminity idea of the cultural left. That’s unfortunate. There is nothing lesser about being female. If we erase the boundary between men and women, women lose. Having the capicity for females to compete in their domain allows them to do their absolute best and have a chance of earning a medal. If you erase that, no female can win once the kids are past puberty.


11 posted on 04/22/2024 5:57:03 PM PDT by Jonty30 (He hunted a mammoth me, just because I said I was hungry. He is such a good friend. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The Biden/left types are all about erasing biological truth whenever they run into it. They also believe abortion does not kill anything.


12 posted on 04/22/2024 6:02:27 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast (We have not yet achieved peak crazy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

The goal of the left is to get you to admit their lies. That’s how they corrupt civilization.

-George Orwell.


13 posted on 04/22/2024 6:15:52 PM PDT by Jonty30 (He hunted a mammoth me, just because I said I was hungry. He is such a good friend. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

The intent is to remove women’s ability to function in society, try to understand that. If this keeps going, your only safe space in society is going to be in your home.

https://twitchy.com/amy-curtis/2024/04/22/daily-mail-australia-girls-bathrooms-n2395378


14 posted on 04/22/2024 6:46:09 PM PDT by Jonty30 (He hunted a mammoth me, just because I said I was hungry. He is such a good friend. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This

Dennis Prager sums it up nicely. “Truth is not a left wing value.”


15 posted on 04/22/2024 7:41:10 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

obama is gay and does not like women. Biden likes to molest girls and commit incest with his daughter. He or they have hired many freaks in gov’t offices.
They are freaks themselves.


16 posted on 04/23/2024 1:13:13 AM PDT by minnesota_bound (Need more money to buy everything now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I was never a fan of Title IX but all I ever expected it to do would be to destroy more men’s sports like it did for college wrestling *. Now it looks like it’s going to completely destroy women’s sports.

* When you see our Olympic wrestlers getting their buts kicked like they do most every time, thank Title IX.


17 posted on 04/23/2024 4:28:48 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (“History doesn’t repeat itself but it often rhymes” - Possibly Mark Twain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
I think you misunderstand my whole premise here. As far as it relates to scholastic sports, Title IX was an abomination that had no place in U.S. law.

See Post #17.

18 posted on 04/23/2024 4:33:27 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

To me, genderization is a principle that applies to all aspects of life. The Bible was written before the modern era, so life is not the same. However, the principles never change.

If women want to do sports, great. However, when women do sports, the sports they do should only have women competing. However, I have no problem with mixed gender sports if it’s in fun or practice to help women improve.

As far as military goes, we are the first generation in Western society to not want to protect women by keeping them out of the military. However, in my opinion, because women cannot carry the same load as men into the field they should not be permitted on the field. That’s both a practicality and the simple fact that women are at risk of rape by the enemy and by their own troops, as men are aroused in battle and sexually at the same time. However, that is not to say they cannot serve, but they should be serving in a capacity that is useful and not just a statement of being a woman so hear them roar.


19 posted on 04/23/2024 4:39:38 AM PDT by Jonty30 (He hunted a mammoth me, just because I said I was hungry. He is such a good friend. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
The intent is to remove women’s ability to function in society …

And these inane policies are heavily supported by women — or at least they are imposed by bureaucrats who are. And the newest Supreme Court justice is a retard who claims she can’t even define a woman because she’s not a biologist.

So I’m sure you can understand why I just don’t GAF.

20 posted on 04/23/2024 4:41:57 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson