Posted on 04/15/2024 3:44:25 PM PDT by Reno89519
The New York judge overseeing former President Trump’s hush money trial said Monday that Trump cannot attend arguments on presidential immunity at the Supreme Court next week.
...
The decision to not allow Trump to be in Washington, D.C., on April 25, when the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on a presidential immunity claim Trump is making in his federal criminal case, came just before the New York trial adjourned Monday.
“Arguing before the Supreme Court is a big deal, and I can certainly appreciate why your client would want to be there, but a trial in New York Supreme Court … is also a big deal,” Judge Juan Merchan said to Trump lawyer Todd Blanche, rejecting his request to let the former president play hooky.
...
She’s dead, but tell her I said hi.
THAT'S why you both vote Democrat!
“ There are lots of elderly people imprisoned or currently incarcerated. Why should he be different than those should he be imprisoned?”
**************************************************
Why should he be different? Well, for one thing, should any ex-President ever be imprisoned the Secret Service would continue to guard and protect him/her. That would include things such as providing meals that they knew were safe.
But your fantasies of President Trump going to prison are never going to be realized. But you’re free to continue having your fantasies and Walter Mitty dreams.
So you’re trying to tear down Trump and you admire Merchan. Then who do you hope wins the election? The effect of your recent post is to assist the Biden campaign.
Nonstarters? LOL... they are direct on target and so is three. He is fully corrupt.
Honest judges in Columbia face cartel execution. The ones that didn’t.... they are ok in the cartel’s eyes.
The judge came here when he was 6. What the hell are you talking about?
No doubt the child learned from his father, along with the corrupt judicial approach and the Commie mentality.
"Cartel Merch" Merchan contributed to The Tater and "Stop Republicans", expressing sentiments like your dead mom and you.
Who do you hope wins the election? You are working against Trump.
Yes, I noticed that later. Thanks for the mention.
Not sure how I came to believe it was a woman.
None of the above.
Thanks. I don’t know what that means though.
Yes, I noticed that later. Thanks for the mention.
Not sure how I came to believe it was a woman.
It shows a pattern of behavior relevant to the charges.
IRRC, the New York criminal trial is about 34 counts of falsifying business records. What is on the tape to establish a pattern of behavior involving falsifying business records? I thought they wanted to use the comment about "grab 'em by the" privates.
There is a deluge of comments about hush money, but Trump and Daniels entered into a non-disclosure agreement (NDA). Stormy Daniels gave a signed statement of January 30, 2018, denying any affair happened. She took the money and subsequently recanted. She sued Trump for defamation over his charge that the alleged event was a "total con job." She lost.
Just another example of the judge’s extreme bias. Were the litigent not Trump the same judge would have allowed it.
The pattern is a history of philandering and the desire to keep it quiet for the purposes of winning an election,
He didn’t mind the stories coming out before he ran for office.
It's just who he is on FR.
You continue to lie AFTER you got Jillslapped...
I’ve never met this Jill, it’s all a lie.
There’s a picture?
It’s fake. But if real it was just a fan. I don’t remember.
If I paid this, Jill? That her name? Ok, Jill. If there’s a check made out to her with my signature that’s fake.
But if real, it was done without my knowledge. I sign things all the time.
So Jill can just gtfoh. She never slapped me, and if she did, I didn’t enjoy it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.