Posted on 04/06/2024 6:25:40 AM PDT by marktwain
On October 16, 2020, a number of plaintiffs, including Madison Lara, the Second Amendment Foundation, and others, filed a lawsuit claiming Pennsylvania law, which forbids 18-20-year-olds from obtaining a concealed carry permit or from openly carrying outside of the home during an emergency was an infringement of the rights protected by the Second Amendment. This was nearly two years before the Supreme Court decision of Bruen.
On April 16, 2021, the District Court ruled against them. On April 21, 2021, the plaintiffs appealed the decision by the Pennsylvania District Court to the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The decision held Pennsylvania law, which forbids 18-20-year-olds from obtaining a concealed carry permit or from openly carrying outside of the home during an emergency, was not an infringement of the rights protected by the Second Amendment.
The Bruen decision was published on June 22, 2022, clarifying the Heller decision and giving clear guidance on how to interpret Second Amendment cases. In the clarification, the Supreme Court validated the right to carry outside the home and set forth how to perform judicial tests on laws that were challenged as infringing on the rights protected by the Second Amendment.
On February 15, 2024, the defendants argued that 18-20-year-old people were not considered to be part of the people. Judge Restrepo agreed. The defendants filed for a rehearing of the case en banc by the entire Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...
I’m sure the Founders intended for our rights to be subject to the whims of non-elected lawyers. It’s got to be in the Constitution somewhere.
How do you enforce the Bill of Rights without the courts?
Ping
That sure seems to be the common opinion.
What is really sad is that seems to be the common opinion in congress.
When is the last time there was a bill in congress to overrule a USSC decision?
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
2A
later
But they have no qualms about sending other people's 18-20-year-olds off to die for some leftwing pie in the sky cause.
If they're old enough to march off to war carrying weaponry, they're old enough to obtain a concealed carry permit.
When educated people cant properly define what an “infringement” or a “woman” is, they need immediately removed/denied from whatever position of power they may hold or are attempting to aquire.
If you wanna play stupid you get treated like you are stupid.
13 year old boy armed with a musket bayoneted a British officer at the Battle of Saratoga, 1777. partial source:
“Northern Traveler”, 1841. P. 41.
12 year old Mississippi River boat deckboys kept pistols tucked under their belts. 2 Congressmen on board praised them for being armed. Source. Col. Hammond’s Diary/Log of his 1849 trip from NY to gold country California. It’s in Penfield Museum, Chilson NY
Let’s stop letting them vote
I am old enough to remember when schools had shooting clubs with rifle ranges on campus, or when the Boy Scouts were teaching gun safety.
btt
I’m sure the SC is getting tired of telling the states that “shall not be infringed” means what it says. And to argue that 18-20 year olds aren’t people is patently ridiculous.
Kent A. Jordan [Dubya judge], D. Brooks Smith [Dubya judge] and L. Felipe Restrepo [Obama stooge] were the three-judge panel.
Obama's stooge Restrepo dissented [doesn't understand Bruen].
ORDER (CHAGARES, Chief Judge, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, PHIPPS, FREEMAN, MONTGOMERY-REEVES, CHUNG and SMITH**, Circuit Judges) denying Petition En Banc and Panel Rehearing filed by Appellee Commissioner Pennsylvania State Police. Judges Shwartz, Krause, Restrepo, Freeman, Montgomery-Reeves and Chung voted to grant the petition. Judge Krause files the attached dissent. Jordan, Authoring Judge. *with attached dissent by Judge Krause. **Judge Smith’s vote is limited to panel rehearing only. (LMR) [Entered: 03/27/2024 04:07 PM]
Judges Shwartz [Obama stooge], Krause [Obama stooge], Restrepo [Obama stooge], Freeman [Biden stooge], Montgomery-Reeves [Biden stooge] and Chung [Biden stooge] voted to grant the [en banc] petition. Judge Krause [Obama stooge] files the attached dissent.
The Third Circuit is seven Dubya-Trump judges versus six Obama-Biden stooges.
The BooHoo girl feels bad for the Commie "judges" on the Third Circuit.
The simple question is, “are you saying all our wars are fought by adolescents?”
Its stupid this issue ever comes up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.