Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/14/2024 3:06:39 PM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Coronal

So disappointing, but not unexpected.


2 posted on 03/14/2024 3:09:54 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

Reuters take on things.

Cannon, who was appointed to her post by Trump, ruled that question “warrants serious consideration” but should not be decided at this point.

That’s not dismissing, is it? She just says, “at this point.”


3 posted on 03/14/2024 3:13:49 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (In a world of parrots and lemmings, be a watchdog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

But Biden, who appears guilty of much worse, skates free.

COMPLETE BS


4 posted on 03/14/2024 3:15:19 PM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal; All

I hope she is being political here...”Needs consideration” could mean, let’s wait until we get a better political bump from the decision.


6 posted on 03/14/2024 3:16:25 PM PDT by wiseprince (Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

Julie Kelly said the same thing would happen “As expected” but she also expects her to dismiss the case based on selective prosecution..there is more rulings to come on this matter


7 posted on 03/14/2024 3:17:42 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

But Biden can walk out of a bunch of SCIF’s over a 47 year period with documents that normally would buy you a 45 year sentence for taking. Nothing happens to him. Just an old guy, no big deal.

The judiciary and the DoJ are now done in this country. The illegitimate power they have seized has to be undone. Trying to tie the President up in legal tar was never the intention of any of the Founders or the States.


8 posted on 03/14/2024 3:18:21 PM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

The gallows have already been erected in the town square. They’ll jail him in October and hang him in November.


9 posted on 03/14/2024 3:18:35 PM PDT by Quentin Quarantino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

Wow! Our judicial system is completely effing broken. And all day the effin rats were crying in there lattes…I bet you tonight they’ll be effin celebrating. THERE IS NO JUSTICE ANYMORE only corruption. FJB gets nothing Trump on the other hand gets a jury and a sentence….INCREDIBLE! Jack smith is smiling tonight!!


10 posted on 03/14/2024 3:21:54 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal
FORT PIERCE, Florida, March 14 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Friday denied former U.S. President Donald Trump's request to dismiss a criminal case that charges him with illegally holding onto classified documents after leaving the White House.

Friday? Tomorrow or last week?

11 posted on 03/14/2024 3:22:12 PM PDT by CrosscutSaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

” A federal judge on Friday denied former U.S. President Donald Trump’s request to dismiss a criminal case that charges him with illegally holding onto classified documents after leaving the White House.”


Interesting. Especially since today is Thursday.


13 posted on 03/14/2024 3:24:21 PM PDT by CFW (I will not comply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

The good new is Trump now sees NOT to take the advice of the GOP-e when appointing judges.


16 posted on 03/14/2024 3:35:03 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

Seems Obozo is telling them to drag trial out as long as possible.....


19 posted on 03/14/2024 3:39:41 PM PDT by chopperk (s to )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

Trump will easily win the other defense motion about classified documents handling law. That law clearly allows any president to keep classified docs based on certain criteria.


22 posted on 03/14/2024 3:45:00 PM PDT by Bobbyvotes (I will be voting for Trump/whoever in November. If he loses in 2024, country is finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal
But Biden skates (even though he has done worse) only because there is no jury that would convict him.

Yep, that seems fair. (rollong eyes)

24 posted on 03/14/2024 3:45:54 PM PDT by volare737
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

And another thing don’t be listening to Julie Kelly. She has been more wrong then, right so many multiple times. Her predictions never come to light. She only gives false hope to Trump and his supporters. She is not a lawyer all she is is a glorified cook. The DC swamp has trump by the short hairs and they’re not gonna let go until he is in prison! And if you think these trials will end after the election I’ve got news for you wait until he’s in office they’re gonna make his term LITERALLY hell. 😡


26 posted on 03/14/2024 3:48:38 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

I have said it before, I’ll say it again. Selective prosecution. After the Espionage Act (EA) was passed in 1917, it was common for Presidents when they left office to retain and take with them all manner of official records including National Defense Information. They were still declassifying material from the Eisenhower library just a few years ago. This was one of the reasons the Presidential Records Act (PRA) was passed in the late 1970’s however there is no criminal penalty for violating the PRA.

Since no ex President has ever been prosecuted under the EA, it seems obvious that the authors of the EA and subsequent Government personnel did not believe that the EA applied to ex Presidents, especially since they traditionally retained authorization to view and possess National Defense Information and classified materials even once they were out of office.

Trump’s case appears to be the only time in US history that an ex President has been prosecuted for retention of National Defense Information despite previous Presidents also having those materials in their possession as civilians.


41 posted on 03/14/2024 4:36:26 PM PDT by XRdsRev (Justice for Bernell Trammell, Trump supporter, murdered in 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

I have a very different take on this.

By keeping the case in the news, she is helping DJT. Any publicity is good publicity. Every one of my friends will tell you the endless court cases has steeled their resolve to vote for Trump. His name is on the front page of newspapers where he could not buy a campaign ad.

Much closer to the election she will dismiss on “selective prosecution” grounds. With any luck Jack Smith is fired and prosecuted himself...


48 posted on 03/14/2024 4:49:11 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

No wonder it was so crowded downtown today.


49 posted on 03/14/2024 4:51:01 PM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coronal

63 posted on 03/14/2024 5:42:12 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson