Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden Administration Appeals Texas Border Law To Supreme Court
Forbes ^ | March 4, 2024 | Molly Bohannon

Posted on 03/04/2024 2:53:47 PM PST by packagingguy

The Biden administration asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on a controversial law in Texas that allows state and local law enforcement to arrest people they believe entered the country illegally—the latest move in a back and forth on the Texas law that President Joe Biden’s team thinks undermines federal immigration law.

In an emergency request filed to the Supreme Court Monday, the Department of Justice said Texas’ state Senate Bill 4—which was signed into law in December and initially set to go into effect on Tuesday—would “profoundly (alter) the status quo that has existed between the United States and the States in the context of immigration for almost 150 years.”

The law allows state and local law enforcement officers in Texas to arrest and jail anyone they suspect crossed the border illegally, which immigration advocates like the ACLU of Texas are concerned “fuels racial profiling and harassment.”

The law would also put the U.S.’s relationship with Mexico at risk, the filing said, saying that if Texas can “remove noncitizens to Mexico without its consent,” there would be “significant and immediate adverse effects” on the relationship with Mexico that is “critical to the federal government’s ability to effectively address immigration at the southwest border.”

The Biden administration argues in the filing that “the authority to admit and remove noncitizens is a core responsibility of the National Government,” not that of states, and that allowing Texas’ law to go into effect would conflict with past rulings from the court.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: arrest; biden; bidenalieninvasion; bidenregime; bideordercrisis; border; borderlaw; domesticenemies; illegals; scotus; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: packagingguy

AGH! SCOTUS PUTS IT ON HOLD.🤬


21 posted on 03/04/2024 4:21:52 PM PST by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA! DEATH TO MARXISM AND GFLOBALISM ! AMERICA, COWBOY UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

Hmm, Alito issued the hold.


22 posted on 03/04/2024 4:24:58 PM PST by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA! DEATH TO MARXISM AND GFLOBALISM ! AMERICA, COWBOY UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

https://www.npr.org/2021/07/23/1019706421/texas-arrests-border-crossers-trespassing-charges


23 posted on 03/04/2024 4:29:32 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Immigration law is Federal and is enforced by the Feds...not the States...

Hmmm...


24 posted on 03/04/2024 4:30:51 PM PST by montanajoe ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

It takes 4 justices to grant centiorari, meaning the case will not be heard by SCOTUS unless 4 justices say yes. They may just punt and let the lower ruling stand.

EC


25 posted on 03/04/2024 4:34:26 PM PST by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe

Texas calls them trespassers. Nothing to do with immigration. They’ve been arresting them for years. I think the link I posted will help.


26 posted on 03/04/2024 4:35:36 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

The link you posted was July 2021 the SC ruled on this today...

It may be that this has nothing to do with immigration law...but I would not count on it...


27 posted on 03/04/2024 4:40:40 PM PST by montanajoe ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

Obama is, unfortunately, a hateful man with lots of animosity and an agenda. He is clearly contributing to the mess that is.


28 posted on 03/04/2024 4:50:29 PM PST by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe

2021....to show this has been going on for years


29 posted on 03/04/2024 4:57:15 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Tx 4 lnk.


30 posted on 03/04/2024 5:52:47 PM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Unlike NM, AZ and CA, Texas owns it’s border with Mexico. Almost all of the Texas border with Mexico is in state or private hands. Step on the north side of the river uninvited and you’re trespassing.


31 posted on 03/04/2024 7:16:19 PM PST by Dusty Road (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe

The Supreme Court upheld the federalism required by the Constitution today, in requiring federal matters to be addressed solely at the federal level. The same rationale, and clear language in the Constitution, will have them finding that only the federal government can create or enforce immigration law.


32 posted on 03/04/2024 7:53:50 PM PST by Bob Wills is still the king
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bob Wills is still the king; montanajoe
Bob Wills is still the king:
"only the federal government can create or enforce immigration law"

Then it follows, that U.S. "Sanctuary Cities" are un-consitutional.

33 posted on 03/04/2024 7:56:13 PM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Bob Wills is still the king; montanajoe

And it follows. that I still cannot see misspellings!

“consitutional” - > constitutional

[sigh]


34 posted on 03/04/2024 7:58:24 PM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

Texas may not have a say
in the Fed’s immigration
enforcement efforts (or
lack thereof), but they
have every right to defend
themselves against invasion.
Which I assume, is how the
bill passed by Texas is
framed. They’re not creating
their own seperate set of
immigration policies, just
arresting invading
trespassers.


35 posted on 03/04/2024 10:50:01 PM PST by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lean-Right

Agree and hope the SCOTUS does same.


36 posted on 03/04/2024 10:52:05 PM PST by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative
What is currently undermining federal immigration law is the federal government.

True. And how are they benefiting??

37 posted on 03/05/2024 8:52:55 AM PST by GOPJ (Question: What are the two things Biden finds at ice cream shops? A. Ice cream and young children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

Borders and immigration are primarily a federal responsibility.

There is a long history of cooperation between federal, state, and local law enforcement.

Biden’s executive authority does not extend to telling states what to do or not do unless such authority is granted by the legislature by statute (which must also be Constitutional). I am unaware of any such authority.

Is there a law that says state law enforcement CANNOT identify those who are in their state illegally?

Is there a law that prohibits states from arresting illegal immigrants in their states?

Is there a law that prohibits states from deporting illegal immigrants from their states?

Where is the federal law Texas is breaking? Biden and the Emocrats not liking what they are doing does not constitute these actions being unlawful.


38 posted on 03/05/2024 10:54:11 AM PST by unlearner (I, Robot: I think I finally understand why Dr. Lanning created me... ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

I agree with you completely.


39 posted on 03/20/2024 2:13:48 PM PDT by Bob Wills is still the king
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Bob Wills is still the king

Really good looking girlfriend, introduced me to western swing, out west, back in the late 1970’s. Fun.


40 posted on 03/20/2024 2:24:32 PM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson