Collusion?
March 25?. Hmmm...something about that date...How is this OK in the United States of America. Free no longer.
Payoffs are not illegal...it’s done all the time.
NY judge rejects Trump’s bid to throw out hush-money case, sets March trial date
__________________________________________________________
The state legal system of New York engaging in racketeering against Trump? Whodathunk!?! /s
Good grief, subpoena the Congressional hush money for sexual misconduct fund, the taxpayers are responsible for.
This is something that almost every politician does and it is perfectly legal. If Trump wins, which I hope he does, he needs to ORDER the AG and US Attorneys to immediately INDICT every Demonrat Politician that has ever paid off their whores in any way.
‘concealing payoffs to alleged lovers to hide potential sex scandals from voters in the 2016 presidential election.’
At least he didn’t try to use government resources to push false narratives, hide evidence of corruption, or reveal financial misdeeds related to money laundering. That would be too much for this country to bear!
It may be disgusting to have to pay off a blonde woman just to be heard and understood clearly, but there obviously must be a fundamental right to do so.
Most people speak not to flap their jaws, but to be heard and understood.
I believe all campaign finance laws should be deemed unconstitutional.
Judge Juan Manuel Merchan said Thursday that**** he made the decision****.
Anybody want to buy a UFO I found in the back yard?.
Ds don’t want this case to be the first to trial because it’s the weakest and viewed as a joke and completely political, which helps Trump with voters.
Exposing it as such— whether winning or losing— tarnishes any and all cases that follow as political prosecutions. Americans don’t appreciate X-Prez persecutions, except for those severely infected with TDS
Weird how,gay sex in a gov building is a-ok, but mere allegations of hush money charges are enough to take the president of the nation to court, when even if true, money paid to someone to get them to drop a case is not illegal. Should the one that was paid “hush money” be the one facing a charge for breaking the AGREEMENT that they signed?
Let’s play fire with fire. We need Republicans to infiltrate the jury selection! I don’t know how I don’t know what the steps would be, but we need to start fighting back! This is getting out of hand. Enough! The rats are notorious for infiltrating our elections by running as Republicans, and yet not a peep out of us. This is a war, and the only way is to infiltrate, however possible the jury pool selections. Either we swim or sink we need to start taking the O’Keefe route!!
Then all NDAs should be voided.
These women were not involved in court testimony, so whatever he paid them,
it’s not a matter for a court to get involved in.
This is juvenile level thinking on this judge’s part.
These are all cases that should be tossed out on appeal.
If the women did not declare the income on their tax returns, that could be
an infraction for a court to get involved in.
I’ve lost track. Which case is this? Stormy Daniels? E.Jean Carrol?
For comparison, when John Edwards had his trial, a North Carolina jury acquitted him of "hush money." Watch a New York jury convict President Trump for the same thing.
-PJ
Trump’s new AG in 2025 better go after every one of these corrupt judges and attorneys.
See how they like it. Deny them witnesses, testimony and a defense.
Make them squirm.