Conservative group tells judge it has no evidence to back its claims of Georgia ballot stuffing

MSN ^ | 14th February 2024 | RUSS BYNUM

[Ennis85]

A conservative group has told a Georgia judge that it doesn't have evidence to support its claims of illegal ballot stuffing during the the 2020 general election and a runoff two months later.

Texas-based True the Vote filed complaints with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in 2021, including one in which it said it had obtained “a detailed account of coordinated efforts to collect and deposit ballots in drop boxes across metro Atlanta” during the November 2020 election and a January 2021 runoff.

A Fulton County Superior Court judge in Atlanta signed an order last year requiring True the Vote to provide evidence it had collected, including the names of people who were sources of information, to state elections officials who were frustrated by the group's refusal to share evidence with investigators. In their written response, attorneys for True the Vote said the group had no names or other documentary evidence to share.

“Once again, True the Vote has proven itself untrustworthy and unable to provide a shred of evidence for a single one of their fairy-tale allegations," Raffensperger spokesman Mike Hassinger said Wednesday. "Like all the lies about Georgia’s 2020 election, their fabricated claims of ballot harvesting have been repeatedly debunked.”

True the Vote’s assertions were relied upon heavily for “2000 Mules,” a widely debunked film by conservative pundit and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza. A State Election Board investigation found that surveillance camera footage that the film claimed showed ballot stuffing actually showed people submitting ballots for themselves and family members who lived with them, which is allowed under Georgia law.

The election board subpoenaed True the Vote to provide evidence that would assist it in investigating the group's ballot trafficking allegations.

True the Vote's complaint said its investigators "spoke with several individuals regarding personal knowledge, methods,

[Titus-Maximus]

NJ Political Organizer Charged Over 2022 Ballot Fraud Scheme
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/us/biden-administration-charges-operative-over-2022-ballot-fraud-scheme-5582503?utm_source=andshare

[Dr. Franklin]

Push came to shove, and TTV had nothing.

Push did not come to shove. TTV choose to fight another day. They had not evidence, because they didn't want to have any evidence hand over to Ratburger.
Patience, Little Grasshopper!

[DoodleBob]

Please understand, I’m not suggesting that research and discovery into what happened in 2020 should go black.

But human capital is a finite resource. Further, there are only 168 hours in a week. All the time and effort - and money - spent by Mike Lindell and others to catch a thief is getting us nowhere…at this time.

Maybe in 5 years, people will start to take a fresh look at 2020 because if Mike and others. The R&D being performed today will help tomorrow. Just like the grassy knoll and “Maybe the CIA DID kill Kennedy” isn’t hushed out of fear, maybe even leftists will be willing to acknowledge some “oddities” in 2020.

Solving 2020 is a noble cause. And I’m all for learning errors so they can be corrected.

But nobody will care about 2020 if 2024 isn’t secured, transparent, and live-streamed. And I’ll be blunt: our side is terrible at multitasking. Indeed, for MONTHS FR was lit up with Trump bs DeSantis flame wars.

[Fuzz]

It’s been over three years.

Waiting for what?

[kiryandil]

There is still a case pending in GA about thousands of missing ballot images which keeps getting delayed.

Yes, that is the Garland Favorito & VoterGA case I talked about above in the thread.

Brian Amero teamed up with Fani Willis to hide the ballots.

Amero never dreamed that Fatti Willis would out herself as an incompetent and corrupt POS -and thus shine light on his own actions in that case.

The stooge Amero claimed that VoterGA had no standing after delaying the case for MONTHS.

I believe an appellate court over-ruled his stooge ruling, allowing the case to go forward.

[Golden Eagle]

You doubt the election was stolen because the courts would do nothing to remedy the fraud?

I greatly appreciate your posts, but what evidence of actual fraud has been presented, to any court? Rules may have been broken on how votes were allowed to be gathered, but no evidence exists that any votes were fraudulent in nature that I am aware of. Until some evidence of that type comes forth, there is no substantiated reason to assume anything was fraudulent.

traitorous RINOs…haven't addressed the voting fraud issues

The ones in office didn’t lose their elections, nor were they donated $250M to “stop the steal” as Trump was, so they likely see the onus on Trump to prove any such fraud, which he has failed to do from a legal standpoint. Again, I’m speaking strictly from the point of reality of who was affected, and what have they done about it. Sure, he’s done a masterful job of convincing his most ardent followers he was wronged, but will that really matter in the end.

[Dr. Franklin]

It’s been over three years.
Waiting for what?

The day of reckoning.

[linMcHlp]

- - - -

Dominion Voting Machine In Action:
https://commonsenseevaluation.com/2020/12/10/a-dominion-voting-machine-in-action/

"It'll even scan a batch of blank ballots and vote for whoever you tell it to"

For example: You can collect 960 mailed in ballots for Trump, and [administratively] mess them up enough to *force 'adjudication'* and then shred/trash those Trump ballots . . . and then substitute 960 pre-printed blank ballots and "administratively adjudicate" the blanks, for Biden.

- - - -

Heritage Foundation - A Sampling of Recent Election Fraud Cases from Across the United States
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
- - - -
Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States
January 4, 2024 - PDF file
- - - -
The Navarro Report Vol I, II, III - Feb. 2, 2021
Peter Navarro - PDF file (Dropbox.com link - where you click on a few buttons in succession, to get the downloaded PDF file)
- - - -
Counties Using Dominion Voting Systems
EXCERPTS from November 21, 2020 FraudSpotters article by Ben Turner:
Statistical Evidence of Dominion Election Fraud? Time to Audit the Machines
- - - -
Here is an evidence collection - "this is a crowdsourcing tool for organizing anomalies and legal issues":
Here is the Evidence
https://hereistheevidence.com/
- - - -
Mail-in Ballots Curb-Side Collection Site [Donald J. Trump Twitter account video of 11/11/2020 still works 07/19/2023]
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1326630618831130624
- - - -
Tracking all the court cases
A Running Compendium of Fraud Charges in Election 2020
- - - -
Re U.S. voting systems connected to internet
January 10, 2020 - NBC News:
'Online and vulnerable': Experts find nearly three dozen U.S. voting systems connected to internet
- - - -

[Golden Eagle]

I’ve still got videos from 2020 on my FR homepage showing how Dominion machines can easily be manipulated. But no actual evidence has ever come forth that is what happened in the 2020 election. We were told it would, but then Dominion has won every court case. I think Mike Lindell is up next, and I hope he somehow wins, but as of now it is not looking likely.

[Albion Wilde]

“Ehhhh, it was lies. All lies.”

[Dr. Franklin]

I greatly appreciate your posts, but what evidence of actual fraud has been presented, to any court? Rules may have been broken on how votes were allowed to be gathered, but no evidence exists that any votes were fraudulent in nature that I am aware of. Until some evidence of that type comes forth, there is no substantiated reason to assume anything was fraudulent.

You missed the point. No evidence of fraud was presented to the courts exactly because the courts didn't want to hear that evidence. As a procedural matter it didn't go that far and didn't go beyond the preliminary objections. They are still fighting in GA to get the ballot images. If the ballot images can't be produced, that is evidence of fraud, i.e., destruction of evidence. This is called running out the clock: delay, delay, delay.

The ones in office didn’t lose their elections, nor were they donated $250M to “stop the steal” as Trump was, so they likely see the onus on Trump to prove any such fraud, which he has failed to do from a legal standpoint. Again, I’m speaking strictly from the point of reality of who was affected, and what have they done about it. Sure, he’s done a masterful job of convincing his most ardent followers he was wronged, but will that really matter in the end.

I don't know how much money Trump got. Ronna McRomney went around collecting money, but what for what it was spent, I know not. Of course, lawyers aren't cheap, but they were playing a rigged game in the courts. I think because of the Biden economy, the border crisis, and all of the wars that the U.S. taxpayer is funding, people who didn't vote for Trump in 2020 are slowly concluding that the election was stolen, and not just for POTUS.

[kiryandil]

I greatly appreciate your posts, but what evidence of actual fraud has been presented, to any court?

Missed the Wisconsin Supreme Court thingee, did ya?

[Golden Eagle]

You missed the point. No evidence of fraud was presented to the courts….

No my friend, that is the exact point. As I said I’m a bottom line guy, and no evidence has been presented, as you just said. I’ve been patient too, but years have gone by now. I still hope something comes out, but the losing streak is long, and Trump only seems interested in keeping his supporters in line, who have clearly shown they don’t care about the actual court cases. They may think their anger will overcome the rule of law, but history shows otherwise. ‘The reckoning’ as you said is usually for those who defy it.

[roving]

We saw them steal that election live.

[Golden Eagle]

Evidence of vote fraud was presented? Wonderful, what was it?

[kiryandil]

Your deliberate obtuseness shows your game.

Too luck about your boy DeSantis, BTW.

And it looks like Nimrata's turn, next...

[kiryandil]

We can talk about the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling on 2020 till we’re blue in the face, but we’ll still get clown posts like #95...

[kiryandil]

Good Lord!

In #93, the clown still believes there's "rule of law" in this country!

[Golden Eagle]

What was that in Wisconsin you were talking about? Nothing, after all?

[kiryandil]

The pertinent information is posted above, NeverTrump.