[Dr. Franklin]

I greatly appreciate your posts, but what evidence of actual fraud has been presented, to any court? Rules may have been broken on how votes were allowed to be gathered, but no evidence exists that any votes were fraudulent in nature that I am aware of. Until some evidence of that type comes forth, there is no substantiated reason to assume anything was fraudulent.

You missed the point. No evidence of fraud was presented to the courts exactly because the courts didn't want to hear that evidence. As a procedural matter it didn't go that far and didn't go beyond the preliminary objections. They are still fighting in GA to get the ballot images. If the ballot images can't be produced, that is evidence of fraud, i.e., destruction of evidence. This is called running out the clock: delay, delay, delay.

The ones in office didn’t lose their elections, nor were they donated $250M to “stop the steal” as Trump was, so they likely see the onus on Trump to prove any such fraud, which he has failed to do from a legal standpoint. Again, I’m speaking strictly from the point of reality of who was affected, and what have they done about it. Sure, he’s done a masterful job of convincing his most ardent followers he was wronged, but will that really matter in the end.

I don't know how much money Trump got. Ronna McRomney went around collecting money, but what for what it was spent, I know not. Of course, lawyers aren't cheap, but they were playing a rigged game in the courts. I think because of the Biden economy, the border crisis, and all of the wars that the U.S. taxpayer is funding, people who didn't vote for Trump in 2020 are slowly concluding that the election was stolen, and not just for POTUS.

[Golden Eagle]

You missed the point. No evidence of fraud was presented to the courts….

No my friend, that is the exact point. As I said I’m a bottom line guy, and no evidence has been presented, as you just said. I’ve been patient too, but years have gone by now. I still hope something comes out, but the losing streak is long, and Trump only seems interested in keeping his supporters in line, who have clearly shown they don’t care about the actual court cases. They may think their anger will overcome the rule of law, but history shows otherwise. ‘The reckoning’ as you said is usually for those who defy it.

[kiryandil]

We can talk about the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling on 2020 till we’re blue in the face, but we’ll still get clown posts like #95...

[kiryandil]

Good Lord!

In #93, the clown still believes there's "rule of law" in this country!