I hope Abbott sends more illegals to leftist areas! It’s time the lefties know how the rest of the country feels!
And automobiles ?
The Constitution prohibits any State from restricting the movement of people within the US.
Oh, right, THEY don’t have to follow the Constitution.
“We’re dealing with a person who just wants to disrupt,” Adams said Tuesday, referring toTexas Gov. Greg AbbottPresident Joe Biden.
It’s an asylum state...The only way to change it is to take away that status through the legislature. Notice the gov is silent...and so is Schumer...But that’s all about getting some big bucks to NYC.
Isn’t this a restriction on Interstate Commerce?
I mean, IF YOU CAN’T SHIP DEMOCRAT ILLEGAL ALIEN SLAVES ACROSS BORDERS, WHAT CAN YOU DO?
What a racist!
How’s about expanDing it to the frickin’ BORDER!!!!!
Isn’t this what Greg Abbott is doing in Texas? Limiting transportation into his state? I guess its OK for New York but not Texas.
One more mode of transportation and we’ve got ourselves a zany comedy.
I’m having a good time envisioning if President Trump had restricted transporting illegals... the outcry would have been deafening! so far we hear silence about Adams and Murphy. No heads exploding, nothing.
Where are all the Scumbag Law Firms? Why aren’t they screaming about Immigrants Rights while these rogue State Actors unleash Law Enforcement on these peaceful travelers while Criminally Threatening them for exercising their right to travel them Forcing them against their will to Get back on the Bus.
Last I checked Gov Abbott has ironclad evidence these migrants VOLUNTEERED to go to these sanctuary cities.??
“Mayor Eric Adams wants to add trains and planes to his executive order limiting migrant buses arriving in the Big Apple...”
He should just build a wall....
Freedom of movement under United States law is governed primarily by the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution which states, "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States." Since the circuit court ruling in Corfield v. Coryell , 6 Fed. Cas. 546 (1823), freedom of movement has been judicially recognized as a fundamental Constitutional right. In Paul v. Virginia , 75 U.S. 168 (1869), the court defined freedom of movement as "right of free ingress into other States, and egress from them." However, the Supreme Court did not invest the federal government with the authority to protect freedom of movement. Under the "privileges and immunities" clause, this authority was given to the states, a position the court held consistently through the years in cases such as Ward v. Maryland, 79 U.S. 418 (1871), the Slaughter-House Cases , 83 U.S. 36 (1873) and United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883).
So, states and municipalities can override the constitutional right to interstate travel? By whose authority? Obviously, Biden has provided migrants a national right to illegally traverse our border into non sanctuary Texas and Arizona and prohibit those 2 states from preventing them entry. But, no right to traverse interstate lines into blue sanctuary states and cities once they have inundated Texas and Arizona?
Then he should arrest Biden.
What? I thought they were a sanctuary city!
Funny how they can’t understand that border states do not want these people either. States that voted for RATs deserve to have all these people dumped on their lawns.