1 posted on
12/23/2023 8:20:12 AM PST by
lightman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: lightman
The obfuscation is amazing. The explanation of the obfuscation is even more confusing.
2 posted on
12/23/2023 8:24:14 AM PST by
cyclotic
(Don’t be part of the problem. Be the entire problem)
To: lightman
The edict is merely confusing and ill-timed”? Leave it to an LBGTQXYZ degenerate to completely miss the mark.
3 posted on
12/23/2023 8:24:36 AM PST by
Bishop_Malachi
(Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
To: lightman
What’s next? Glory holes in the confessional booth?
4 posted on
12/23/2023 8:31:10 AM PST by
moovova
("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
To: lightman
Is he going to ‘bless’ the pedophiles next? Is there anyone that Pope doesn’t except? Well, other than honest conservative citizens? The only people it appears he hates...
5 posted on
12/23/2023 8:34:15 AM PST by
GOPJ
(Surgery doesn't make a man a woman anymore than wearing a Gorilla costume turns a man into an ape.)
To: lightman
6 posted on
12/23/2023 8:34:51 AM PST by
Karliner
(Heb 4:12 Rom 8:28 Rev 3, "...This is the end of the beginning." Churchill)
To: lightman
7 posted on
12/23/2023 8:39:43 AM PST by
Ge0ffrey
To: lightman
What Church is this author talking about? The Catholic church is an apostate religion based on sin and is getting worse day by day.
9 posted on
12/23/2023 8:45:47 AM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
To: lightman
Leave Rome.
Find a local Bible church.
12 posted on
12/23/2023 9:05:48 AM PST by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: lightman
The office of Antichrist, as described in 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, is teeing this up for one of his successors to take it even further.
The confusion is purposeful so as to finesse it into ‘did God really say?’ like his spiritual father Satan did in the garden.
15 posted on
12/23/2023 9:29:51 AM PST by
rephope
To: lightman
For Catholics, Protestants and Orthodox alike, Romans 1 remains in the canon.
Additionally, for more than these, the tales of the "overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboiim" appears in Genesis, so all the Judeo-Christian world must still confront the issue.
Ignoring to be trendy and "inclusive" and "gender diverse" and all is simply against scriptural accounts. Basing some "new" version of a denomination on ignoring parts of the canon means the canon no longer has actual meaning to the revisionists.
But their genitals and what they do with them seems to be the "god" -- with a small "g" -- that is worshiped.
To: lightman
I do not like this Pope, having said that I read the entire letter and except for one paragraph which is what the media and braindead are focused on there is perfect clarity. The paragraph in question states that couples in a irregular or even homosexual relationship can receive certain non liturgy blessings if they are sincere in wanting to remove the sin from their lives. He should not have used the word couple...that is the flaw.
18 posted on
12/23/2023 9:34:25 AM PST by
Wpin
("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
To: lightman
Vatican City the land of bend over and grab your ankles
To: lightman
The secular leaning NP Post can’t bring itself to call the edict morally wrong and degenerate even in non-Western cultures and communist countries.
To: lightman
The secular leaning NP Post can’t bring itself to call the edict morally wrong and degenerate even in non-Western cultures and communist countries.
To: lightman
We need church clarity now more than ever.
There is plenty of clarity, staring us right in the face.
Isaiah 30:1
Woe to the rebellious children, saith the LORD, that take counsel, but not of me; and that cover with a covering, but not of my spirit, that they may add sin to sin:
33 posted on
12/23/2023 10:48:09 AM PST by
af_vet_1981
( The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began)
To: lightman
The implication that Jesus and the writers of New Testament did not speak clearly on this topic is unsupportable.
What the Bible says about fornication, immorality and sexual relations is not subject to papal edicts.
To: lightman
The Church of Condoning Faggotry
No thanks
36 posted on
12/23/2023 11:32:48 AM PST by
NWFree
(Sigma male 🤪)
To: lightman
Oh boy, I see the FR anti-Catholic bigots are out in-force on this one. I'm intrigued by the ones that can't differentiate between a horrible Pope and the Catholic Church. One wonders if these mental midgets hated America once Obama was elected saying that the Founders were always wrong and they approved of the Marxism that the Magic Negro brought. Oddly, they know the press lies to them, but if CNN says "Hey, the Pope's all for gay marriage" they'll respond, "See! I knew it. Whore of Babylon!*&^%!!"
What a bunch of gullible morons.
To: lightman
Let’s just cut to the chase: This pope is a fag.
39 posted on
12/23/2023 12:10:15 PM PST by
fwdude
(.)
To: lightman
Renouncing my Catholicism until the Communist Pope is dead!
42 posted on
12/23/2023 1:13:55 PM PST by
Road Warrior ‘04
(BOYCOTT Anheuser Busch, the NFL, MLB, NBA, NASCAR & Faux Snooze! Molon Labe! Oathkeeper! )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson