To: E. Pluribus Unum
What are they afraid of?
A little sunshine never hurt anything.
2 posted on
11/04/2023 3:05:05 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
SHOW THEIR PURE EVIL ACTIONS!!!
3 posted on
11/04/2023 3:07:32 PM PDT by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Could a Trump Justice Department scare these TINY men and women?
4 posted on
11/04/2023 3:11:56 PM PDT by
Mark
(DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They do not want people to see what a sham and how unjust their courtroom is.
What people can’t see and hear they can get their fake news to frame the narrative.
5 posted on
11/04/2023 3:15:56 PM PDT by
dforest
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sixth Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
6 posted on
11/04/2023 3:16:01 PM PDT by
SauronOfMordor
(Either you will rule. Or you will be ruled. There is no other choice.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
7 posted on
11/04/2023 3:18:15 PM PDT by
Lockbox
(politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting…)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
All criminal court proceedings should be broadcast. Period.
8 posted on
11/04/2023 3:21:39 PM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(1218 - NEVER FORGET!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sounds like that maggot Smith is wanting to show off for the hairy-chested liberal ladies.
10 posted on
11/04/2023 3:27:09 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
('Build Back Better' is a Bidenskyyyyyyism for 'we gotta get rid of all dem white peoples'.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Trumps lawyers don’t want this? Are they nuts? Trump should be pounding on the table to broadcast this stuff.
12 posted on
11/04/2023 3:28:19 PM PDT by
Vermont Lt
(Don’t vote for anyone over 70 years old. Get rid of the geriatric politicians.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Well gee I thought they had such a slam dunk case that everyone would want to see it but they dont want anyone to see it because they have NO case, they never did
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Democrats want cameras in the courtroom so they can edit it like they did in the Jan6 inquisition.
Media approved
17 posted on
11/04/2023 3:42:02 PM PDT by
Vaduz
(....)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
And turn it into a circus like the OJ trial? No thanks.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The morons (Libtard judges and lawyers) only want cameras in courtrooms to get name recognition to build their careers on a national level. Recently, the examples of their "best and brightest" looking like complete fools made them camera shy.
22 posted on
11/04/2023 4:43:08 PM PDT by
RasterMaster
("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It doesn’t add up to me. If they supposedly have a slam dunk case, like they claim they do, wouldn’t they want cameras in the courtroom?
24 posted on
11/04/2023 6:13:06 PM PDT by
matt04
( )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
One thing I learned from the Zimmerman and Rittenhouse trials, was that when the cameras are on, the media gets exposed as the bald faced liars that they are
Even then, they still try to distort the facts that everyone just saw with their our eyes
Let the sun shine in
26 posted on
11/05/2023 2:03:36 AM PST by
digger48
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Jack (Off) Smith is afraid that the media exposure will help the Trump campaign And he wants America to be restricted in knowledge about the case. Its a presidents duty ti challenge any election whichi has serious defects. And Trump is complete;y covered in his actions, just as Democrats have been over the years when they used process to challenge election results. Jack (Off) Smiths case is a kangaroo court case, and shiuld have been dismissed on a preliminary motion . but for the lefty commie judge, an Obama appointee, Smutkin.
28 posted on
11/05/2023 4:21:50 AM PST by
Candor7
(( Ask not for whom THE Trump trolls...He trolls for thee!)<img src=""width=500></img>)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson