Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/04/2023 3:04:29 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

What are they afraid of?

A little sunshine never hurt anything.


2 posted on 11/04/2023 3:05:05 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

SHOW THEIR PURE EVIL ACTIONS!!!


3 posted on 11/04/2023 3:07:32 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Could a Trump Justice Department scare these TINY men and women?


4 posted on 11/04/2023 3:11:56 PM PDT by Mark (DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They do not want people to see what a sham and how unjust their courtroom is.

What people can’t see and hear they can get their fake news to frame the narrative.


5 posted on 11/04/2023 3:15:56 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sixth Amendment

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

6 posted on 11/04/2023 3:16:01 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Either you will rule. Or you will be ruled. There is no other choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Cui bono?


7 posted on 11/04/2023 3:18:15 PM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

All criminal court proceedings should be broadcast. Period.


8 posted on 11/04/2023 3:21:39 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (1218 - NEVER FORGET!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sounds like that maggot Smith is wanting to show off for the hairy-chested liberal ladies.


10 posted on 11/04/2023 3:27:09 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ('Build Back Better' is a Bidenskyyyyyyism for 'we gotta get rid of all dem white peoples'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trumps lawyers don’t want this? Are they nuts? Trump should be pounding on the table to broadcast this stuff.


12 posted on 11/04/2023 3:28:19 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Don’t vote for anyone over 70 years old. Get rid of the geriatric politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Well gee I thought they had such a slam dunk case that everyone would want to see it but they dont want anyone to see it because they have NO case, they never did


13 posted on 11/04/2023 3:28:41 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Democrats want cameras in the courtroom so they can edit it like they did in the Jan6 inquisition.

Media approved


17 posted on 11/04/2023 3:42:02 PM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And turn it into a circus like the OJ trial? No thanks.


19 posted on 11/04/2023 4:18:30 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The morons (Libtard judges and lawyers) only want cameras in courtrooms to get name recognition to build their careers on a national level. Recently, the examples of their "best and brightest" looking like complete fools made them camera shy.

22 posted on 11/04/2023 4:43:08 PM PDT by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It doesn’t add up to me. If they supposedly have a slam dunk case, like they claim they do, wouldn’t they want cameras in the courtroom?


24 posted on 11/04/2023 6:13:06 PM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

One thing I learned from the Zimmerman and Rittenhouse trials, was that when the cameras are on, the media gets exposed as the bald faced liars that they are

Even then, they still try to distort the facts that everyone just saw with their our eyes

Let the sun shine in


26 posted on 11/05/2023 2:03:36 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Jack (Off) Smith is afraid that the media exposure will help the Trump campaign And he wants America to be restricted in knowledge about the case. Its a presidents duty ti challenge any election whichi has serious defects. And Trump is complete;y covered in his actions, just as Democrats have been over the years when they used process to challenge election results. Jack (Off) Smiths case is a kangaroo court case, and shiuld have been dismissed on a preliminary motion . but for the lefty commie judge, an Obama appointee, Smutkin.
28 posted on 11/05/2023 4:21:50 AM PST by Candor7 (( Ask not for whom THE Trump trolls...He trolls for thee!)<img src=""width=500></img>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson