Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It doesn’t add up to me. If they supposedly have a slam dunk case, like they claim they do, wouldn’t they want cameras in the courtroom?


24 posted on 11/04/2023 6:13:06 PM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: matt04

If it were a legitimate court, that would be correct.

It’s a kangaroo court, and they won’t be able to kangaroo it if it is televised.

The “judge” in Alex Jones’ Sandy Hook case turned the camera on and off to fit the official narrative.

The fact that Jones was not allowed a jury trial for the guilt phase, was not allowed to plead innocent, and was not allowed to present a defense was not televised. The jury trial was for the judgement phase, and the judge told the jury Jones was guilty and had more money than God.

They want to do the same thing to Trump.


25 posted on 11/04/2023 7:07:10 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson