Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nearly 70% of US troops are overweight or obese, research report says
Stars and Stripes ^ | 10/17/23 | Doug G. Ware

Posted on 10/19/2023 9:31:11 AM PDT by JonPreston

WASHINGTON — Almost seven out of every 10 U.S. troops are either overweight or obese, according to a new report, which also warns the growing trend could compromise military readiness and undermine national security.

The American Security Project, a Washington-based nonprofit organization that studies modern national security issues, conducted the study and found 68% of active-duty service members fall somewhere between overweight and obese on the body mass index, which is a long-used but controversial method of assessing a person’s body classification by height and weight. A person between 25 and 30 on the BMI is considered clinically overweight and more than 30 is considered obese, according to the National Institutes of Health.

“Rapid and sustained recurrence of obesity across all services, ranks and positions now poses a dire threat, especially for at-risk populations and those in critical combat roles,” the group’s report states. “Designing an effective strategy to monitor and tackle obesity within the U.S. military begins by treating it like any other chronic disease.”

(Excerpt) Read more at stripes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bodyshaming; fatso; fogarty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: JonPreston

Not a reliable number if it’s based on BMI. No doubt our military has a weight problem but it’d be nice to see a study based on body fat percentage or something along those lines.


21 posted on 10/19/2023 10:01:57 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

“A person between 25 and 30 on the BMI is considered clinically overweight”


For all of the issues the military has with poor candidates, and that what is best for the military is not the same as what is best for people generally, that BMI range is associated with the best overall health outcomes. BMI is a broken evaluation system which is not even designed for individual evaluation, but doesn’t even match up properly for populations.

Even further, it is known to be flawed for people with high muscle mass, as one would expect from a properly functioning military.


22 posted on 10/19/2023 10:02:48 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restless

ANG is, for the most part, not the real military - especially so in regards fitness, but also in many other areas.

Also, military fitness tests - flawed as they are - are multi-function tests rather than just running. Try improving at both sit-ups and pushups, and then see your run times. You can literally become more fit and athletic overall and have your run times increase.


23 posted on 10/19/2023 10:08:19 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

“Thank god they are all vaxxed and boosted.”

The vaccines were never supposed to cure anything. And they never have. But if you understand military medicine you’d know that it is within the need to keep the member in the battle and not down and out. And that’s what the vaccines provide, make you feel better therefore you can work.

The article separates overweight and obesity concerning military members. According to the Harvard T H Chan:

“Roughly two out of three U.S. adults are overweight or obese (69 percent) and one out of three are obese (36 percent).”

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/obesity-prevention-source/obesity-trends-original/obesity-rates-worldwide/#:~:text=Roughly%20two%20out%20of%20three,are%20obese%20(36%20percent).

So this problem with the military is consistent with US society. But there’s something that is not entered into the equation. Many military members are extremely cut. If the measuring system is based upon height and weight then the in shape person could be considered overweight even though they are in tremendous shape. And remember, these are the people that have to be in shape so they work out at least 5 times a week to stay that way. I had a troop that was competing for the Washington state body building championship at light heavy that for military standards, was overweight. It happens more than you think. And the overall standard for weight and fitness is different for each of the branches to the point that the regulations involved over rule themselves.

wy69


24 posted on 10/19/2023 10:09:28 AM PDT by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Yardstick wrote: “Not a reliable number if it’s based on BMI. No doubt our military has a weight problem but it’d be nice to see a study based on body fat percentage or something along those lines.”

Some like BMI because it’s easy and cheap. All you need is a set of scales and a tape measure for height. About all it’s useful is as a screening test for more detailed body fat tests.


25 posted on 10/19/2023 10:10:57 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Exactly. BMI doesn’t distinguish between fat and muscle. To BMI it’s all just mass. So it would tend to lump the very fit warrior types in with the fatties as “overweight.”


26 posted on 10/19/2023 10:11:19 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston; Navy Patriot
"Americans" that hate America and always support Russia?




27 posted on 10/19/2023 10:12:21 AM PDT by canuck_conservative (there would be no more need for NATO, if Russia could just stop attacking its neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Restless

I told all my folks that if they wanted the regular AF to treat them equally, people needed to not be ABLE to guess they were reservists. That used to mean staying in shape. Now it’s more the reverse: a lot of reservists are in better shape than their AD counterparts.

Colonel, USAF JAGC (ret)


28 posted on 10/19/2023 10:13:08 AM PDT by jagusafr ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston
When my son went to USMC boot camp at MCRD (San Diego) in June 2001, he was in great shape. Had just placed 3rd in a large local 5k run. 30 pullups no problem. On graduation day from boot camp, he looked gaunt. Underfed for the muscle mass he had before boot camp. There were many sent to the "fat" platoon to get fit enough for normal boot camp.
29 posted on 10/19/2023 10:13:10 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative; JonPreston

The Globohomo Empire is homogenous.

https://globalnews.ca/news/3017931/report-suggests-three-quarters-of-canadian-forces-personnel-are-overweight-obese/


30 posted on 10/19/2023 10:14:16 AM PDT by Reverend Wright ( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Thanks for posting, BMI readings are notoriously inaccurate. However, I would not be surprised if a quarter of active duty service members are overweight and obese.


31 posted on 10/19/2023 10:14:38 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Gonzales! Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

From what I have observed, the same could be said about doctors and nurses.


32 posted on 10/19/2023 10:16:48 AM PDT by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

33 posted on 10/19/2023 10:16:52 AM PDT by JonPreston ( ✌ ☮️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston



34 posted on 10/19/2023 10:18:03 AM PDT by canuck_conservative (there would be no more need for NATO, if Russia could just stop attacking its neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Correct.. the current BMI does not take muscle mass into account.


35 posted on 10/19/2023 10:21:49 AM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
I'd bet on these guys before Fat Canadians.


36 posted on 10/19/2023 10:23:25 AM PDT by JonPreston ( ✌ ☮️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

you’ll lose that bet, Comrade


37 posted on 10/19/2023 10:24:39 AM PDT by canuck_conservative (there would be no more need for NATO, if Russia could just stop attacking its neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
BMI is a standard derived by the WHO using worldwide averages. I have a BMI of 26.4 as compared and averaged to a Somali of the same height.

Everyone on the planet is overweright in that comparison.

38 posted on 10/19/2023 10:30:08 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

I have an idea…let’s recruit millions on mentally Ill Trannies and LGBTQI that a weight-fluid! That’ll help!


39 posted on 10/19/2023 10:33:29 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

If I have the calculation right, a 5’8” man who weighs 165 lbs has a BMI of 25.1 and is therefore considered “clinically overweight” and unhealthy. Depending on a man’s build and musculature, that is, for many men, nonsensical, just bad, meaningless medicine. I am not advocating lowering standards to match these slack times, but a 5’8” man could very easily have minimal body fat and be perfectly healthy, in fact a fit long distance runner, at 165 lbs. In fact, some male soldiers with those dimensions could benefit from pumping iron and putting one a few more pounds of muscle. Obviously, there are better tests of body fat composition such as tape tests or floating, etc.


40 posted on 10/19/2023 10:54:52 AM PDT by Stingray51 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson