[rdcbn1]

Not a Cheney fan by any means, but she does have a valid point.

[Dilbert San Diego]

What is her valid point?

[gibsonguy]

but she does have a valid point.“

BS.

[Herodes]

Did you come from behind or under that rock?

[liberalh8ter]

No, she doesn’t have a point. How badly did she lose? Her thinking isn’t in line with Republican voters and a lot has happened since her loss.

[TiGuy22]

Not a Cheney fan by any means, but she does have a valid point.

What? That Jordan will abandon the constitution?

[Bayard]

When has she ever been correct?

[dfwgator]

but she does have a valid point.

It's on top of her head.

[odawg]

“Not a Cheney fan by any means, but she does have a valid point.”

As a sitting representative, Cheney knows precisely what the voters want.

[Luke21]

Yeah. We need Republicans like Cheney. Democrats tremble. Yeah.

[ModelBreaker]

“but she does have a valid point.”

What is your thinking behind that?

[lodi90]

It’s almost certain that the GOP will lose the House in 2024 due to Democrats court wins and other reasons. So it makes sense for the RINOs to leave a token conservative holding the bag when they go down.

[Ignatz]

“Not a Cheney fan by any means, but she does have a valid point.”

Which point?
That merely nominating Jim Jordan means Republicans have abandoned the Constitution, or that Republicans will deservedly lose the House?