Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top American Law Schools Promote Ditching the Constitution
Epoch Times ^ | 08/23/2023 | Darlene McCormick Sanchez

Posted on 08/23/2023 9:48:16 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

In almost every state, law students who pass their state bar examination, which allows them to practice law, take an oath to support the U.S. Constitution.

But the country's top law schools teach future lawyers and judges the opposite.

Many now teach that the U.S. Constitution, the supreme law of the nation since its ratification in 1788, is broken and should be scrapped.

At least that's what two members of conservative think tanks believe after reviewing courses at the country's Top 10 law schools, as ranked by U.S. News and World Report in 2022. They examined the teaching at Yale, Stanford, Harvard, and Columbia universities and others.

Law professors at elite schools are open about their disdain for the U.S. Constitution, the researchers found.

"They're saying they want to get rid of the Constitution—they're making no secret about it," said J. Christian Adams, president and general counsel of the Public Interest Legal Foundation. He's also worked for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation's Edwin Meese III Center and former DOJ counsel, agreed.

The radicalization of law schools is a threat to freedom not previously encountered in the nation's history, Mr. von Spakovsky said.

"In fact, some of them are very direct in teaching kids that they need to be revolutionaries, according to these courses that these law school students are taking," he told The Epoch Times.


Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation's Edwin Meese III Center. (Benjamin Chasteen/The Epoch Times)

PITCHING THE DITCHING OF THE CONSTITUTION

In 2022, Ryan D. Doerfler and Samuel Moyn—who teach law at Harvard and Yale universities, respectively—wrote a New York Times editorial titled "The Constitution Is Broken and Should Not Be Reclaimed."

In it, they wrote that the struggle over the Constitution has proven to be a dead end for liberals. They called the founding document "undemocratic" and "inadequate."

"The real need is not to reclaim the Constitution, as many would have it, but instead to reclaim America from constitutionalism," they wrote in the piece.

The writers reasoned that it would be far better if liberal legislators had the power to make a case for abortion and labor rights on their own merits without having "to bother with the Constitution."

That way of thinking has pushed law schools increasingly to the political left over the past decade, Mr. Adams said.

"The stuff they're teaching now is straight-up Marxist. There's a big difference from just 10 years ago."

Mr. von Spakovsky and Mr. Adams have been sounding the alarm about what's happening within the country's law schools through articles examining law school curricula.

Schools often teach that the Constitution is a tool of discrimination that must be uprooted, Mr. von Spakovsky said.

The idea that the Constitution and the United States are hopelessly flawed stems from critical race theory (CRT) and the concept of promoting social justice.

CRT has been spotlighted by works such as The 1619 Project by New York Times writers.

The 1619 Project, widely lauded by the political left, paints the United States as a country founded on slavery. It characterizes the nation's Founding Fathers as racists.

While The 1619 Project has been rejected by many academics, historians, and politicians, its teachings have been embraced vigorously by the left. Many have held it up as a model of how history should be taught to children and college students.

The ideology upholds that thinking that "our Constitution is a patriarchal, oppressive document used to suppress minorities and just about everyone else," Mr. von Spakovsky said. "And we are supposedly a systematically racist, misogynist society, and these law students need to go out and preach and practice revolution."


J. Christian Adams, president of the Public Interest Legal Foundation. (Courtesy of the Public Interest Legal Foundation)

CREATING REVOLUTIONARIES

Classes such as "Decentralized Resistance" and "Law and Inequality" at Yale University are examples of the far-left infiltration of law schools, Mr. Adams claims in his series of articles.

The "Decentralized Resistance" class is about social change that results from "everyday resistance." Accumulating widespread and numerous acts of everyday resistance can precipitate "quasi-revolutionary" change, class instruction tells law students, Mr. Adams said.

"Law and Inequality" explores "inequality along lines of race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and class," he said.

This kind of classroom instruction has given rise to the far-left notion that prisons should be emptied because they're "racist," Mr. von Spakovsky said.

The popularization of these ideas also led to the election of George Soros-funded prosecutors in Democrat-run cities. Mr. Soros is a Hungarian-born businessman who has donated billions to left-wing causes.

Conservatives lament that Soros-friendly prosecutors care more about criminals than their victims and allow them to go unpunished while crime spirals out of control.

Left-wing ideology holds that laws wrongly target minorities more than white people. Proponents of that thinking say society needs to find a more equitable way of dealing with crime, such as using social workers to rehabilitate lawbreakers instead of putting them behind bars.

"What they want is lawyers and judges who simply decide cases brd on ideology, not on the law," Mr. von Spakovsky said.

FIGHTING WORDS

Cancel culture, censorship on social media platforms, and the rise of activists who successfully shut down opposing speakers work together to demonstrate the left's "unbelievable contempt" for the First Amendment, the bedrock of democracy, Mr. von Spakovsky said.

"They literally equate words with violence," he said.

"So if you are expressing any kind of opinions that they disagree with, [they argue that] you don't have a First Amendment right to engage in that kind of speech because it suppresses minorities and others," he said.

Several classes at Stanford University demonstrated a shift away from the more routine courses on torts and contracts to classes with a more militant tone, Mr. von Spakovsky wrote in his articles.

Stanford law school offers "Violence, Resistance, and the Law," which teaches how the law "suppresses and invites resistance" and identifies the "subjects against whom legal violence is deployed."

"The State of Democratic Discourse" course at Stanford is "devoted to a candid discussion about the current state of public discourse, both nationally and in universities, focusing especially on misinformation and intimidation."

GAG RULES

Those ideas played out in real life in March when the Stanford chapter of the Federalist Society invited 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Kyle Duncan to speak on campus.

While he tried to deliver his speech, a mob of about 100 students heckled and shouted him down while faculty members did nothing. And some encouraged the students.

Judge Duncan asked for an administrator to address the hecklers.

Instead, Tirien Steinbach, Stanford Law School's associate dean for diversity, equity, and inclusion, took to the podium, scolding the conservative judge for the "harm" he inflicted with his rulings.

Students were angry at Judge Duncan because he refused in 2020 to allow a transgender inmate convicted of possessing child pornography to change his pronouns to female.

The judge had to be escorted from the law school by federal marshals.

Ms. Steinbach was put on administrative leave and resigned in July. But Stanford didn't punish students or other administrators and only required them to complete free speech training.

LAW AND DISORDER

The now-viral video of the judge's treatment grabbed public attention and drew concern from conservatives.

Austin Knudsen, Montana's attorney general, wrote a May 16 letter to Montana Supreme Court Chief Justice Mike McGrath addressing left-wing tactics in law schools.

Students are "far too comfortable using intimidation to silence opposing viewpoints," Mr. Knudsen wrote.

Activist students, he wrote, are "self-styled members of the progressive vanguard and justify their actions brd on the perceived evil of conservative legal views."

He warned that disruptions at elite law schools are everyone's problem, and "Montana can't bury its head in the sand and hope it goes away."

"We are at a turning point for the integrity of the legal profession," he wrote.

The behavior on campus will soon show up in the courts if there are no consequences for the student's actions, Knudsen warned.

MONKEY BUSINESS

Top law schools have demonstrated a dramatic shift in focus, even when compared with just 10 years ago, Mr. Adams said.

It's important to take notice because graduates from elite law schools go on to influence government, courts, academia, and corporate America, he said.

The preaching of CRT, radical gender ideology, feminism, and climate change have been woven into much of the curriculum of Ivy League schools, such as Harvard Law, according to his review.

He noted a feminist offering at Harvard Law called the Bonobo Sisterhood , a one-credit course at Harvard Law. The class examined how people can learn about feminism from primates in a male-dominated society.

The course examines the "power and potential of female alliances to disrupt patriarchal systems."

The course description reads: "Through a legal, political, social, cultural, and economic lens, we ask what lessons the bonobos—our close primate relatives who share 98.7% of our DNA—offer humans for creating a society free of male sexual coercion."

CRADLE OF CRT

Columbia University, the cradle of critical race theory, also offers classes on CRT.

The Institute for Social Research at Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany, developed Marxist ideologies that came to be known as The Frankfurt School.

After being forced out of Germany by the Nazis, the institute's researchers relocated to Columbia University in New York in 1933 and developed critical theory.

That legacy now shows up in Columbia law classes, such as "Legal Methods II: Critical Race Methods: Practices, Prisms, and Problems."

The class description says the United States "suffers from many forms of discrimination," and the course will examine the "interface between legal interpretation, lawmaking practices, and racial hierarchy," Mr. von Spakovsky noted in his review.

The widespread social justice focus at top law schools suggests law firms would be better off hiring lawyers from state schools, he said.

But even there, "woke" ideology is rampant.

In a December 2022 Epoch Times story documenting CRT's effect on conservative college students, one law student at a Florida University confirmed that the Constitution was attacked in his law class.

The student, who wished to remain anonymous, recalled students arguing that the Constitution was illegitimate from the start and was written by racist, old, white men.

The professor didn't express that he condoned that point of view. But he didn't offer a rebuttal, either, the student said.

POISONING THE WELL

Not all conservatives are pessimistic about the future of the legal profession.

According to William Jacobson, a clinical law professor and director of the Securities Law Clinic at Cornell Law School, concepts such as CRT have long been taught in law schools.

Mr. Jacobson founded the Legal Insurrection website, which tracks CRT.

The increasing popularity of CRT in schools prompted him to start CritialRace.org in 2020, which maintains a databr of schools and colleges that teach or employ CRT-related policies.

He doesn't keep a databr on law schools that teach CRT because, traditionally, that's the only place it was taught, Mr. Jacobson said.

It wasn't until recently that the concepts began trickling down into K–12 classrooms and other college courses. That's where the concept became more controversial, he said.

The problem started when CRT evolved into anti-racism training.

It sounds innocuous. But the theory is to prescribe racism against whites and others of "privilege" in the name of retribution for racism against minorities in the past, present, and future.

"At the law school level, it's not going to bring down America," he said.

But it can certainly "poison the well," Mr. Jacobson said, by dividing people brd on race or gender into oppressors or victims.


Darlene McCormick Sanchez reports for The Epoch Times from Texas. She writes on a variety of issues with a focus on Texas politics, election fraud, and the erosion of traditional values. She previously worked as an investigative reporter and covered crime, courts, and government for newspapers in Texas, Florida, and Connecticut. Her work on The Sinful Messiah series, which exposed Branch Davidians leader David Koresh, was named a Pulitzer Prize finalist for investigative reporting in the 1990s.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: constitution; crt; lawanddisorder; lawschools; marxisttyranny; orwellian; project1619; quasirevolutionary; sedition; soros; sorosprosecutors; spakovsky
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: SeekAndFind

“In almost every state, law students who pass their state bar examination, which allows them to practice law, take an oath to support the U.S. Constitution.”

Thus it follows that those who are promoting ditching the Constitution, should be disbarred.


41 posted on 08/23/2023 12:50:22 PM PDT by FMBass (Que sais Je)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

EF them all.


42 posted on 08/23/2023 1:15:10 PM PDT by Clean_Sweep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Liberal logic: If the Constitution isn't broken fix it until it is.
43 posted on 08/23/2023 1:16:57 PM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The writers reasoned that it would be far better if liberal legislators had the power to make a case for abortion and labor rights on their own merits without having "to bother with the Constitution."

Just who would these "legislators" be? If they discard the Constitution, they are discarding Congress. That means they are discarding the very "legislators" who would now have the "power to make a case for abortion and labor rights."

The only legislators who would remain are those in the state legislatures, and they already have the power to make abortion law.

-PJ

44 posted on 08/23/2023 1:19:59 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clean_Sweep

Way way too many lawyers!

I wish I had a buck for every time I heard this conversation between college seniors:

Senior 1: Hey what are you going to do now that you graduated?

Senior 2: Dunno, I can’t think of anything I want to do. Guess I’ll go to law school!


45 posted on 08/23/2023 1:22:24 PM PDT by Reily (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: chuckee

Delegates will operate under strict commissions from their state legislatures.

CA, IL, NY would probably send delegates with Marxist orders, but it is simply silly to assume a majority of states would similarly do so.


46 posted on 08/23/2023 1:41:42 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They have got to be the stupidest people on the planet. Are there Darwin awards for this sort of crap?


47 posted on 08/23/2023 2:04:39 PM PDT by NeverTyranny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My constitutional law class in 1989 worshipped thee Warren cover and hoped the elastic commerce clause would allow the federal gubment to fix those dumb hixks.


48 posted on 08/23/2023 2:42:44 PM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Academic Wokery - bump for later...


49 posted on 08/23/2023 3:02:12 PM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I might have become a lawyer, once upon a time. Then I worked for some of them, and got over it.


50 posted on 08/23/2023 3:39:35 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10; AnthonySoprano
Trump can endorse candidates from lists that patriots who respect the federal government's constitutionally limited powers provide for him, as long as candidates are not incumbents, candidates also promising to repeal the 16th (direct taxes) and 17th (popular voting for federal senators) Amendments after they win office.

27 states have mail in voting on demand, no reason required

What did the legislatures of those states do about mail in voting? Would they really guarantee better senators?

51 posted on 08/23/2023 4:53:44 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

.
That’s amazing.

They think unsecure Elections have been working for them, no doubt.


52 posted on 08/23/2023 4:57:53 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano (Impeachment is necessary since Deep State is blocking )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wait until the products of these institutions try to write a brief that offhand dismisses the Constitution or urges a court to take a blatantly unconstitutional action.


53 posted on 08/23/2023 5:08:47 PM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Vote by mail on demand is not as bad as mailing out ballots to a voter list automatically, but it’s bad enough.


54 posted on 08/23/2023 6:03:53 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If these schools or universities are promoting this then they are not top schools.


55 posted on 08/23/2023 10:50:11 PM PDT by chris haney (Apache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"In 2022, Ryan D. Doerfler and Samuel Moyn—who teach law at Harvard and Yale universities, respectively—wrote a New York Times editorial titled "The Constitution Is Broken and Should Not Be Reclaimed."

"In it, they wrote that the struggle over the Constitution has proven to be a dead end for liberals."

A dead end for liberals... That works for me..

56 posted on 08/24/2023 3:49:26 AM PDT by unread (A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left ... ECC. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; READINABLUESTATE

The “Bonobo Sisterhood” course (Bonobos being a type of chimpanzee) to study primate behaviour to justify Leftist feminism and violence (as do the Bonobo animal groups- always by violence, they having uh... no laws or mentality to make any!) ...

Another name for the “course” at freaking Stanford— Monkey See, Monkey Do!!!! And the monkeys then... do. See BLM and Antifa year of rioting and billions in damage and murders of people. We are NOT monkeys... but many of the human population has regressed to them, to justify their own incompetence and illogic.


57 posted on 08/24/2023 6:13:44 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right
"The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime."

Hmmmm... I wonder who it is that commits most all of the "crime"

58 posted on 08/24/2023 6:16:44 AM PDT by unread (A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left ... ECC. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Yes list articles but list important activities and end results.

Look at this associate dean... she IS a “Bonobo Sisterhood” as in bonobos which are chimpanzees, violent cannibalistic chimps who kill other chimp groups and eat them! A naturalistic approach to the analysis of degraded society at this expensive school level (which we all pay for, btw) is worthwhile. Note the actions, statements and advocacy of animalistic Marxists. Marx was a loser who sought his own elevation through the murder of others (a very mentally ill person, most of whose kids suicided).

Matter of fact this former dean IS a bonobo...regressed primate chimp bonobo. What a harridan, with of course and Ankh amulet necklace- from the good old pagan Egypt! Monkey See.. Monkey(ette) Do!


59 posted on 08/24/2023 6:21:49 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: bk1000
The founders made it quite clear that the "Bill Of Rights" are God given rights.

I believe That's why the left works so hard at destroy Christianity...

60 posted on 08/24/2023 6:23:57 AM PDT by unread (A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left ... ECC. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson