The U.S. Capitol in Washington on July 6, 2023. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)
Posted on 07/14/2023 7:58:13 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
House conservatives are bundling the nation’s defense budget with “culture war” amendments they say are needed to reverse the Biden administration’s “woke” politicization of the military through “radical race theories” instituted in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.
The U.S. Capitol in Washington on July 6, 2023. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)
In the span of 10 hours on July 13, the Republican-led House repealed the Department of Defense’s (DOD’s) abortion travel policy, prohibited DOD health care programs from providing gender transition procedures, and introduced a host of other proposed add-ons targeting DEI programs—including several that failed—to a must-pass defense budget normally approved in bipartisan accord.
Democrats resisted fiercely, contending the nation’s defense budget is being held hostage by a relatively small cadre—the 40-member House Freedom Caucus—manipulating its pivot in sustaining the GOP’s narrow 10-seat chamber majority to impose an “extreme right-wing agenda” onto the Pentagon and, eventually, the nation.
That was the nub of repeated—and often heated—point-counterpoint exchanges during daylong deliberations on the House floor as the proposed $886.3 Fiscal Year 2024 defense budget, referred to as the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), was introduced for adoption with 370 proposed amendments.
Both House and Senate armed forces adopted their versions of the proposed NDAA last month. The House did so in a 58–1 vote and the Senate 24–1.
The annual defense budget is geared to be implemented when the new fiscal year begins on Oct. 1. The House is expected to formally adopt the NDAA by July 14 when it resumes deliberations at 10:30 a.m. after adjourning around 11:30 p.m. on July 13.
Both chambers’ defense spending plans top out at the $886.3 billion requested in March by the Biden administration, but the Senate version of the NDAA—which will be introduced on the Democrat-led chamber floor next week—does not include the amendments in the House version targeting “woke” policies.
Representatives in early afternoon began sorting through 80 proposed NDAA amendments dispatched to the floor by the House Rules Committee that morning. The day before, the panel had forwarded 290 proposed add-ons “en blanc,” meaning many are packaged for composite votes because they are not contentious.
Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Texas) sought to repeal a DOD policy that reimburses expenses for service members who travel to obtain an abortion from a state where the procedure is restricted to a state where it is permitted. It was among the contentious add-ons adopted in a near-total partisan vote, 221–213.
Mr. Jackson maintained the policy was installed by the Biden administration in October 2022 “to sidestep” the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 2022 Roe v. Wade repeal to “not only expand abortion access but also leave American taxpayers on the hook to subsidize abortion services.”
He said the policy is in direct violation of Section 1093 of U.S. Code Title 10 “which restricts funds made available to the DOD from being used for abortions.”
Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.) called the amendment “a dangerous health care travel ban” for women serving in the military, noting 46 percent are now based in states where abortion is restricted or banned.
A former Navy officer, Ms. Sherrill asked: “How am I supposed to recommend to young girls in my district that they should attend a service academy like I did when we know this amendment would mean they would be signing away their right to basic health care? This makes our service women pawns in [conservative Republicans’] extreme agenda and is a steppingstone to larger bans, restrictions, and wholesale disregard for women’s health care in America.”
Reps. Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) and Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.)—in a theme Democrats would repeat all day and night—also argued the proposed amendment is “part and parcel” of a GOP plan to implement a federal abortion ban.
House Armed Services Committee Chair Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) said the amendment simply repeals an illegal policy.
“DOD’s abortion policy is a flagrant disregard to our moral principles. This is part of the Biden administration’s politicization of the military. It is completely unnecessary. It is clearly unlawful,” Mr. Rogers said.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), an Air Force veteran, called Democrats’ contention that repealing the policy is “somehow attacking women in the service” a “lie.”
“To say you would be somehow hurting someone’s rights in the military because you stand with life is pretty bizarre to me,” she said.
Read more here...
Hopefully amendments like these survive the legislative process.
“Hopefully amendments like these survive the legislative process.”
More worried about the COURTS - they seem to get off on butchering kids.
Is this still subject to Biden’s guaranteed veto which may or may not be overridden?
Demonrats saddened
Right...what will Biden do....except I think it’s a “must pass” legislation.
Basic health care
Woman’s health care
Essential health care
Did I miss one?
So if I claim having butt and breast implants is essential basic, woman’s health care, can I get the DoD to pay for it?
What about vaginal rejuvination, colored contact lenses, ear pinning???
You know what I find telling?
1. When a woman goes to the doctor and can’t conceive, other than very basic fertility drugs (clomed) most insurance and government health care won’t do much. But if you want kill your baby, they’ll pay for the basic woman’s essential health care to include logistics!
2. If a woman has lower estrogen levels most insurance and govt won’t pay much for hormone replacement therapy. But if you want the other sexes hormones, they’ll pay for doses 3-5 times what is needed for a biological woman to be in her healthy normal range and even a slew of other “cosmetic” procedures are covered costing the tax payer as much as $150,000 before all is done.
What exactly is “basic womans essential” health care?
They won’t. Wait for the uproar in 3, 2...
Xioabidementia can veto but would severely piss off war profiteers.
Service members would know where the blame lies.
They won’t. The “culture war” was developed by the same corporatist forces that encouraged tolerance and acceptance. Its an easy PR win for progressive Republicans to sate their increasingly angry and disillusioned base while ignoring the very real and likely fatal problems which plague this country. As with the candidacy of Ron DeSantis, built on the same platitudes, it is an intentional distraction- crafted by the same malign forces.
They should ban liberals from joining the military... problem solved.
I wouldn’t count on the courts upholding it, and you know it will be challenged.
So what? These bills won’t see the light of day in a stolen senate and Biden will just veto it. The Dems, unlike Repubs, have no problem shutting down “critical” government services and then blaming Republicans. It’s their superpower that we don’t have.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.