Trump to make video court appearance in DA Bragg ‘hush money’ case

NY Post ^ | 05/23/2023 | Priscilla DeGregory

[ChicagoConservative27]

Former President Donald Trump is slated to appear by video in Manhattan court Tuesday afternoon to hear an order barring him from publicly revealing evidence in the criminal “hush money” case he faces.

Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan earlier this month imposed a slew of restrictions on how Trump, 76, can handle evidence turned over to his defense team by District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office as the ex-president prepares to fight the 34-count indictment.

Trump cannot publicly discuss or disclose any of the sensitive case materials on social media or otherwise, and he can only review the information with his lawyers, according to the May 8 order.

[ChicagoConservative27]

We shall see how this goes

[9422WMR]

Another phony NY trial. This crap is getting old.

[iamgalt]

NY court or DC court the result is a given and the trial is just a sham

[Magnum44]

sensitive case materials

[No name given]

Indeed.

[FlingWingFlyer]

I don’t know why he spends time fooling around with these turd rollers like Bragg. (I still can believe they changed the name of Fort Hood but nobody has demanded that this retard, Bragg, change his name). Trump will never win in a NY “court” in front of sicko moronic New Yawk “judges”.

[Basket_of_Deplorables]

Illegal as hell! Hopefully Trump’s lawyers will appeal immediately after this idiotic hearing.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Everyone is getting bored with this insanity.

[Gary from Dayton]

The dems will edit this video then release it to the public. I hope Trump’s team records it too

[SoConPubbie]

We shall see how this goes

Every DeSantis Fanbois dream:

We finally got Trump!

[Danie_2023]

“Trump cannot publicly discuss or disclose any of the sensitive case materials on social media or otherwise, and he can only review the information with his lawyers, according to the May 8 order.”

That seems to be the, or at least one, ulterior motive and plan behind the ongoing, endless prosecutions against Trump. To keep him from “discussing” any of it. It’s the reach around equivalent of a gag order.

[napscoordinator]

Nope. We do not want to see trump in jail or dead. That’s ridiculous. We’d love to see him as president without social media. Is that too much to ask?

[Vaduz]

Spot on media confused again.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Thou shalt not defend yourself in Democratic Communist Bizarro World.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Since you are obviously smarter than Trump, when did you earn your first billion?

How many elections have you won?

[bert]

The pertinent issue at hand is not previous wins but rather previous losses.

[sauropod]

Yep

[E. Pluribus Unum]

A theft is not a loss, Bart.

[bert]

I understand your point, but is moot. As a matter of historic reality it no longer matters.

Biden is President and there is no court judgement indicating an election loss. So far as all the courts and for that matter, history, Biden won.

Since Biden Won it follows that Trump lost.

I consider Donald Trump to have been a truly great President who introduced the changes required to put America back on track

[E. Pluribus Unum]

You sound like a born quitter/loser.

Too gentlemanly to fight.