Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article



...Two conservative justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, publicly dissented from the decision.

1 posted on 04/07/2023 7:38:14 AM PDT by shadowlands1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: shadowlands1960

Wear in the **** does the Constitution address homosexual perverts playing women’s sports?


2 posted on 04/07/2023 7:40:08 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (It's time to indict the Dung Beetle Party's token affirmative action chubby cheeked shyster lawyer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

Terrible decision. This is going to undercut all of our efforts here in Florida.

The world has gone mad. Beam me up, Scotty.


3 posted on 04/07/2023 7:40:40 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

When the women become angry then something will be done.


4 posted on 04/07/2023 7:41:00 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (The enemy has US surrounded. May God have mercy on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

Don’t believe in genetics?

Simple. Just get a bunch of poli sci majors to overrule it.


5 posted on 04/07/2023 7:42:18 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jiim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

The Supreme Court didn’t rule either way on the case.

The Supreme Court said the case has to go through the normal appeals process. The Supreme Court seldom grants emergency appeals, otherwise they’d have to take up thousands of additional cases every session.


6 posted on 04/07/2023 7:42:41 AM PDT by Roadrunner383
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960
"while litigation continues over its legality in a challenge"

Why can't people READ THE ARTICLE to understand what's actually happening here??? It's maddening how people don't read past the headline.

9 posted on 04/07/2023 7:44:21 AM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

I would put that little he/she on the team and then get a bunch of dudes to identify as well and have them pummel that thing into the ground.

Do what that lifting coach did. Enter a woman’s competition, that had a transgender guy in it. Coach walks up looking like he’s training for the Olympics and crushes everyone.


12 posted on 04/07/2023 7:46:31 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

This was a decision to allow the standard operating jurisprudence work its way through the courts. I don’t like it, but expect that the final Supreme Court rendering will be somewhat different.


14 posted on 04/07/2023 7:47:17 AM PDT by EliRoom8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

The ruling is procedural and it should not be taken as a ruling on the ban directly. The real appeals will come later when the current litigation runs its course.


19 posted on 04/07/2023 7:50:12 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

I feel sorry for the 12 year old who is the pawn in this law suit. People will either have to stop playing sports or get out of public schools altogether.


20 posted on 04/07/2023 7:50:22 AM PDT by DejaJude (I'll be back, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

“Two conservative justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, publicly dissented from the decision.”

And this, folks, is why the left is trying to manufacture phony ethics charges against Clarence Thomas.


25 posted on 04/07/2023 7:52:09 AM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

Women overwhelmingly vote Democrat so women did this to themselves. Stop voting Democrat.


27 posted on 04/07/2023 7:52:46 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

Might as well throw out Title IX.


30 posted on 04/07/2023 7:53:57 AM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14/12 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15/12 - 1030am - Obama team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960
All three of the Trump judges are Missing In Action.
31 posted on 04/07/2023 7:54:32 AM PDT by zeestephen (43,000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960
Republican-backed measures across the country targeting LGBTQ protecting Women's rights.

Fixed it.

32 posted on 04/07/2023 7:55:46 AM PDT by Tommy Revolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

“Republican-backed measures across the country targeting LGBTQ rights”

People have rights. As LGB and Q do not seem to apply, it seems that we are talking about T. What are transexual rights?

Let’s back up a little further. Do transexuals really exist? I recall a serious sounding headline about men giving birth. I bet these “men” have two X chromosomes. “Transexual” “women” do so well in women’s sports you’d almost think they were men. Maybe they are.

Is transsexualism valid science or is it a flight from reality?

What about transexuals shooting up Christian schools? This is a real phenomenon. Why do we look away? For one, too many want to affirm transsexualism. For another, too few want to admit that Christian persecution exists around the world, including the United States.

People have a right not to be murdered. It’s murder, and murderers we should condemn.


40 posted on 04/07/2023 7:59:39 AM PDT by ChessExpert (Required for informed consent: "We have a new, experimental vaccine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

“Republican-backed measures across the country targeting LGBTQ rights.”

Typical mendacious progressive spin.

How about “Democrat-backed measures across the country targeting the rights of actual biological females to equitably compete against other biological females.”


41 posted on 04/07/2023 8:00:31 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

Once upon a time men only had women telling them what to think. Currently it doesn’t matter just as long as it says it’s a woman even if it is not


45 posted on 04/07/2023 8:02:19 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (The enemy has US surrounded. May God have mercy on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960
I've speculated that there are some justices on the U.S. Supreme Court who don't want to touch the "transgender" sports issue with a ten-foot pole. The reason for it is that any separation of men and women in scholastic sports covered by Title IX may be outlawed as a violation of Federal civil rights law.

#EndSegregatedSportsNow

46 posted on 04/07/2023 8:02:34 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I've just pissed in my pants and nobody can do anything about it." -- Major Fambrough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

A biological male pretending to be a woman just so he can compete in women’s sports is the gender equivalent of Blackface.


48 posted on 04/07/2023 8:04:12 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson