Skip to comments.
Terrifying moment Ukraine tank destroys Russian trenches at point-blank range
Daily Mail ^
| 04/04/2023
| Daily Mail
Posted on 04/04/2023 4:59:34 PM PDT by vladimir998
Ukrainian tank destroys Russian trenches after surviving near miss. A Ukrainian tank is seen destroying Russian trenches after it nearly missed getting hit by a Russian anti tank missile on the frontline. Ukrainian soldiers later appear and successfully capture the tactical point.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: eurowars4euroweenies; fagnazilovers; globalistpropaganda; globohomo; letsgoglobo; odessamafianext; takethatputin; tanks; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Ukrainian tank destroys Russian trenches after surviving near miss. A Ukrainian tank is seen destroying Russian trenches after it nearly missed getting hit by a Russian anti tank missile on the frontline. Ukrainian soldiers later appear and successfully capture the tactical point.
To: vladimir998
2
posted on
04/04/2023 4:59:45 PM PDT
by
vladimir998
( Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
To: vladimir998
Fascinating video of real combat. Ukrainian tanks attack Russian positions/trenches.
3
posted on
04/04/2023 5:00:37 PM PDT
by
vladimir998
( Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
To: vladimir998
All Soros / NWO / FJB gaslight, all the time.
4
posted on
04/04/2023 5:02:02 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: vladimir998
The rocket “nearly missed” the Uke tank. In my world that means it hit the tank.
6
posted on
04/04/2023 5:16:58 PM PDT
by
VTenigma
(Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“All Soros / NWO / FJB gaslight, all the time.”
You could muster up some courage and try to prove the video is fake, but you won’t. We both know why.
7
posted on
04/04/2023 5:21:56 PM PDT
by
vladimir998
( Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
To: vladimir998
A Soros stooge talking about “courage.”
Hilarious.
8
posted on
04/04/2023 5:25:08 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
To: VTenigma
The rocket “nearly missed” the Uke tank. The above is a mis-quote.
The wording says a "near miss" not "nearly missed".
A near miss is still a miss.
9
posted on
04/04/2023 5:30:43 PM PDT
by
marktwain
To: vladimir998
It seems like a waist of munitions, using one shell for just a few enemy combatants. They might have known they were going to be disintegrated. Why didn’t they at least run?
But I don’t know anything about these things..
10
posted on
04/04/2023 5:30:53 PM PDT
by
telescope115
(My feet are on the ground, and my head is in the stars. A Man, and proud of it!)
To: VTenigma
I see both "near miss" and "nearly missed" are used.
The terms are somewhat ambiguous.
There is an old saying: A miss is as good as a mile.
To: vladimir998
Yikes. That kinda WAS point-blank range.
It’s a testament about how much energy a volume of earth can take and shield personnel.
Can’t imagine how loud that would have been.
12
posted on
04/04/2023 5:33:58 PM PDT
by
griffin
(When you have to shoot, SHOOT; don't talk. -Tuco)
To: vladimir998
13
posted on
04/04/2023 5:37:32 PM PDT
by
jroehl
(And how we burned in the camps later - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - The Gulag Archipelago)
To: marktwain
No a “ near miss” is still a hit. The tank was “nearly hit”. I don’t care that the colloquial language is a near miss. It’s akin to a double negative.
14
posted on
04/04/2023 5:43:48 PM PDT
by
VTenigma
(Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Thanks for proving my point. I knew you would.
15
posted on
04/04/2023 5:59:03 PM PDT
by
vladimir998
( Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
To: telescope115
“It seems like a waist of munitions, using one shell for just a few enemy combatants.”
They used many shells, but it takes only a short time to get more shells. It takes much longer to get more soldiers.
16
posted on
04/04/2023 6:01:16 PM PDT
by
vladimir998
( Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
To: telescope115
My thoughts too.
A tank is gunning for you, your out of ammo to fight it...seems best to bug out.
17
posted on
04/04/2023 6:02:32 PM PDT
by
dominusobiscum
(A Christians true heart can be revealed by how they treat others anonymously on discussion forums.)
To: vladimir998
This wouldn’t be happening to Russians if it wasn’t for Putin.
18
posted on
04/04/2023 6:06:45 PM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(All the enormous crimes in history have been committed by governments.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Great fantasy you’ve got there.
19
posted on
04/04/2023 6:07:28 PM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(All the enormous crimes in history have been committed by governments.)
To: vladimir998
The video shows the Russian soldier waving a white flag and the tank fires again and MURDERS him.
20
posted on
04/04/2023 6:13:43 PM PDT
by
stockpirate
(Where Justice Ends Tyranny Begins...Repression Breeds Violence)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson