Skip to comments.
Prosecutors dispute Tucker Carlson's depiction of QAnon Shaman in Jan. 6 footage
Washington Examiner ^
| March 12, 2023 05:06 PM
| Asher Notheis
Posted on 03/12/2023 5:56:42 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The newly released footage of Jacob Chansley, the "QAnon Shaman" from the Capitol protest on Jan. 6, only shows four minutes of his time inside the Capitol, according to a new court filing.
The footage, released by Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Monday, does not include most of the evidence that is damaging to Chansley, according to the filing by prosecutors of Proud Boys member Dominic Pezzola, who was also sentenced for his involvement in the Capitol riot. Of the footage that Carlson has shown, the filing read, all of it took place between 2:56 p.m. to 3 p.m. on Jan. 6, even though Chansley had already breached a police line at 2:09 p.m. and then entered the Capitol.
"With the exception of one CCTV camera (where said footage totaled approximately 10 seconds and implicated an evacuation route), all of the footage played on television was disclosed to defendant Pezzola (and defendant Chansley) by September 24, 2021," the filing read. "The final 10 seconds of footage was produced in global discovery to all defense counsel on January 23, 2023."
The release of Chansley's footage to his attorney predated his sentencing, meaning that his plea deal that occurred prior to Sept. 24, 2021 could have possibly been revoked, according to Politico.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dcpeoplescourt; dcsondergericht; dcvgh; dcvolksgerichtsho; dcvolksgerichtshof; deminsurgency; j6; j6videos; jacobchansley; kangaroocourt; kimberlypaschall; lyingeyes; merrickgarland; pelosiscoup; peoplescourtofdc; qanonshaman; roycedogsqueeze; roycelamberth; thepeoplescourtofdc; tuckercarlson; withholdingevidence; yourlyingeyes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
How dare Tucker show video that wasn't selectively edited!
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“...does not include most of the evidence that is damaging to Chansley,...”
No problem. Let’s see ALL of it.
2
posted on
03/12/2023 5:58:47 PM PDT
by
farmguy
To: farmguy
No problem. Let’s see ALL of it. Can't do that. National security and all.
3
posted on
03/12/2023 5:59:24 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Well, show us the really damning video then, prosecutors. That is all you have to do, and don't selectively hand it out. Give it to all the major news outlets, both friend & foe.
It really is that simple. If you don't do it, then all you are doing is offering more BS & lies to cover up your misdeeds.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
National security has been destroyed anyway, by them & their claims, which ring hollow to too many people.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Of course they do, since the alternative explanation should result in them being disbarred, and in a normal world, sitting in a prison cell.
6
posted on
03/12/2023 6:03:41 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Prosecutors dispute Tucker Carlson's depiction of QAnon Shaman in Jan. 6 footage That's because they're scum of the earth, running a kangaroo court like the People's Court of Nazi Germany.
Remember - Adam Schitt was a federal prosecutor. Ol' Bugeyes is just a representative example of the breed of dogsqueeze that infests our US Jesters system.
7
posted on
03/12/2023 6:05:58 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: E. Pluribus Unum; All
That’s rich...prosecutors can selectively edit the footage together to get a conviction (& not give the defense the rest of it) but heaven forbid Tucker show his “selected” video!!
8
posted on
03/12/2023 6:08:19 PM PDT
by
Drago
To: farmguy
Exactly.
Show all the video to everyone. Let the people debate and decide.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I don’t know anybody who trusts shyster “lawyers”.
10
posted on
03/12/2023 6:14:27 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
("I may be a white boy but I'm not stupid". - FJB at Black "History" event. Tell 'em Jo Jo!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Unless Tucker fabricated the video he showed, Jake Chansley deserves a full pardon, a sincere public apology from Joe Biden and the J6 committee, and substantial financial compensation. IMMEDIATELY.
Tucker did not fabricate that video.
11
posted on
03/12/2023 6:16:09 PM PDT
by
TChad
(Progressives are in favor of removing healthy sex organs from children. Conservatives oppose this.)
To: Robert DeLong
You sound like a white nationalist terrorist.
12
posted on
03/12/2023 6:16:29 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Someone else broke the window, went in, and let Chansley in. No Capitol Police officer even attempted to detain or arrest him, and instead led him around in a bizarre "tour" that no one can explain.
4 years in jail is ridiculous for these actions.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
You know damn well that if they had any really incriminating video of him the J6 committee would have shown it.
14
posted on
03/12/2023 6:21:44 PM PDT
by
GMMC0987
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I wonder if Tucker hasn’t set a trap.
Waiting for a response like this, only to release much more tape after the “persecutors” speak out as they just did.
I hope so.
15
posted on
03/12/2023 6:22:11 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Gee, what were the names of the “prosecutors”? Is this anything like ‘unamed source’ or according to
‘anonymous sources’?
16
posted on
03/12/2023 6:35:03 PM PDT
by
LibertyWoman
(America, the Handwriting is on the Wall. )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
One question.
Does the corrupt government have video of Jake committing violent crimes?
I have not seen any..
17
posted on
03/12/2023 6:38:33 PM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Guilty as charged, but only against white supremacist globalist terrorists.
Like the law firm of Biden, Obama, Clinton & Clinton, along with their foreign & domestic clientele er supporters. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.
To: Drago
"That’s rich...prosecutors can selectively edit the footage together to get a conviction
Selectively presenting evidence that suggests guilt and restricting access to evidence that proves innocence. It's the neo-democrat way.
19
posted on
03/12/2023 6:39:59 PM PDT
by
clearcarbon
(Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
To: farmguy
So...they are saying they didn’t use the worst video evidence in their sham persecution?
Interesting...
20
posted on
03/12/2023 6:41:18 PM PDT
by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. The Dhimmicraps are ALL Traitors. All of them.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson