Posted on 03/01/2023 6:06:16 PM PST by george76
A team of scientists from Scripps Research and the University of North Carolina (UNC) has found antibodies in the blood of certain COVID-19 donors that can block infection from a broad set of coronaviruses—specifically, in people who have recovered from the virus and were then vaccinated. They found this includes not only the COVID-19-causing SARS-CoV-2, but also SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV.
The scientists' detailed study of the antibodies and their virus binding sites, reported on February 15, 2023, in the journal Immunity, could lead to the development of a broad coronavirus vaccine and related antibody therapeutics. Both could be used against future coronavirus pandemics as well as any future variants of SARS-CoV-2.
"We show here that there are individual human monoclonal antibodies that can be found that protect against all three recent deadly coronaviruses: SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV," says study co-senior author Raiees Andrabi, Ph.D., institute investigator in the Department of Immunology and Microbiology at Scripps Research.
The other Scripps Research co-senior authors were Dennis Burton, Ph.D., professor and James and Jessie Minor Chair of the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, and Ian Wilson, Ph.D., Hansen Professor of Structural Biology and chair of the Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology. The co-senior authors from UNC were professor Ralph Baric, Ph.D., and assistant professor Lisa Gralinski, Ph.D.
SARS-CoV-2, along with SARS-CoV-1 (the cause of the 2002-04 SARS outbreak) and MERS-CoV (the cause of deadly Middle East Respiratory Syndrome), belong to a broad grouping of coronaviruses known as betacoronaviruses. These viruses mutate at a modestly high rate, creating a significant challenge for the development of vaccines and antibody therapies against them. Thus, in the case of SARS-CoV-2, although existing vaccines have been very helpful in limiting the toll of disease and death from the pandemic, new SARS-CoV-2 variants have emerged that can spread even among vaccine recipients.
Over the past two years, however, the Andrabi/Burton and Wilson laboratories have been finding evidence that SARS-CoV-2 and other betacoronaviruses have a vulnerable site that does not mutate much. This site, which is in the S2 region (or base) of the viral spike protein, is relatively conserved on betacoronaviruses that infect a variety of animal species. By contrast, current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines mainly target the viral spike protein's relatively mutable S1 region, with which the virus binds to host-cell receptors. The S2 site plays a key role in how betacoronaviruses progress from receptor-binding to the membrane fusion that enables entry into host cells in the respiratory tract. In a study reported last year, the Andrabi/Burton and Wilson laboratories found that some human antibodies can bind to this site on SARS-CoV-2 in a way that apparently disrupts viral fusion and blocks infection. The existence of such a vulnerable site raises the possibility of targeting it to provide both long-lasting and broad protection against betacoronaviruses. Therefore, the researchers, for the new study, made a more comprehensive search for anti-S2 antibodies in blood samples from human volunteers.
These volunteers were individuals who had recovered from COVID-19, had been vaccinated, or had recovered from COVID-19 and then had been vaccinated. Somewhat to the researchers' surprise, they found that antibodies to the vulnerable S2 site were present in the vast majority of volunteers in the latter group—people who had recovered from COVID-19 and then had been vaccinated—but at a much lower frequency in the others. Overall, the researchers identified and characterized 32 of these S2-targeting antibodies.
In lab virus neutralization studies and in virus-challenge studies with mice at UNC, the researchers found that several of these antibodies provide protection of unprecedented breadth— not only against SARS-CoV-2 but also SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV betacoronaviruses.
"In principle, a vaccination strategy that can induce such antibodies is likely to provide broad protection against a diverse spectrum of betacoronaviruses," says Burton.
Structural studies of several of the antibodies when bound to S2 illuminated their common binding sites and modes of binding, providing key information that should aid the development of future vaccines targeting this region.
"Targeted rational vaccine strategies could take advantage of this molecular information of the interactions of these antibodies with the S2 domain to inform the design of pan-betacoronavirus vaccines" says Wilson.
Indeed, the researchers have already applied their findings to the initial design and testing of a potential "pan-betacoronavirus" vaccine candidate, which if successful could be stockpiled to limit future pandemics. The investigators also envision a therapeutic mix of different S2-targeting antibodies, perhaps as a cocktail with antibodies to other spike regions, that could be taken to prevent infection by a novel betacoronavirus or to reduce disease in those already infected.
Well, package those antibodies up in a ball and deliver them via mRNA. What could go wrong?
Bkmk
Yeah, I found them too about 40 years ago and I’m not even a scientist.
Back then, before you could be cancelled for it, we called it acquired immunity.
Don’t trust either the scientific or Medical communities anymore.
Couldn’t pay me enough money to try anything they propose, especially COVID related.
Waayyll, duuuhhhh!
Your body creates mRNA every time it needs to make a protein. I get the impression that would be news to mRNA fearmongers.
specifically, in people who have recovered from the virus and were then vaccinated.
Just a way to try and keep pushing the jabs?
Too bad having had covid plus the jab also tends to lead to "died suddenly"
I think it’s pretty accurate and true in both cases. I had Covid before the vaxx or even the test was out. I recovered thanks to the Dr.s throwing everything at it. Then I had to get the vaxx 15 months later for work. I had many brushes with Covid after my first and all were mild, before and after vaxx. But the vaxx gave me pericarditis so, in hindsight, I’d have gone with natural immunity rather than the vaxx. But that first infection put me in the hospital with an bunch of other stuff that came with it which I’m not sure I’d have survived if I had to follow the ‘Covid protocols’ that came out after my hospitalization.
I DO NOT TRUST THEM!
I will never ever trust the medical profession again. Neither specialists, scientists nor “experts”!
Hard pass!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.