p
SHOW 2000 MULES - I BELIEVE IT SHOWS ADMISSIBLE-IN-COURT EVIDENCE
I find this to be a very interesting case and I believe it has merit, unfortunately they will punt on this issue
If picked up this could be ground shaking.
It would be like the recent Turkey quake while Roe v. Wade would seem like the rumble when a truck goes by.
While they’re at it they should censure those who fraudulently investigated Trump over several years.
It would be hard to argue that any US Citizen living under rampant inflation has “no standing”
This is the case that was supposedly going to filed in the circular file.....wonder what the chances are now?
If somehow the court declared fraud and reinstated Trump wouldn’t that mean he can’t run in 2024? Not like it’s gonna happen tho.
I didn’t even know this was a thing until now.
How many other lawsuits out there got completely ignored and summarily dismissed?
Texas?
Oh yeah... they don’t have any standing.
What happens if SCOTUS rule that the 2020 election was a fraudulent farce? Will they install Trump as the rightful POTUS?
I have a feeling that we might be surprised by the Supine Court. I sincerely hope that these plaintiff/lawyers get some expert help.
There is so much legal Constitutional issue here. Does someone have to follow the Constitution or not, is there any potential penalty for elected persons to follow it?
Historically speaking, this was the sole purpose for the formation of the Supreme Court, to determine matters of original jurisdiction, address Constitutionality of laws passed, ensure separation of powers, provide relief to those whose Constitutional rights have been violated.
In everyone of those categories, the current SCOTUS has failed to hear cases that deal with the 2020 election. The do not want to consider the implications of ‘voter fraud’ and it’s effects on the Constitution and populace. They have been clear. They will deny again.
I firmly believe that the Voter Fraud issue will end up being the Civil Rights issue of my lifetime, and will nation will continue to degrade until it’s addressed.
This case represents a very powerful domestic covert operation that is so benign that it cannot been seen on how it has breached our national security, and how it is affecting the national security of both Canada and Mexico, and how it has circulated fears that we might soon see the destruction of property along with a large volume of bloodshed in our own streets. All stemming from the fact that our courts have not declared that the Oath of Office is binding with penalties.
He was given numerous chances to put forth a factually and legally cogent argument, and failed to do so. This is DOA.
Oh REALLY?
Not holding breath, but you still made me look.
.........like a kitten playing with a ball of yarn, these 9 lawyers on the Supreme Court will F this opportunity up.
Opportunity you say? Yes, because this case, on many levels, could save this country and be the all time, all time most important case in the history of the United States Supreme Court. Future generations would carve these 9 justices in granite on the mall in Washington.
But, sigh, they will F it up, I guarantee and be carved on outhouse walls all over America.
C.J. Roberts will GUARANTEE that the Supremes will punt on this one. And, if not, Coney-Barrett and Kavenaugh will wimp out.
In his petition for reconsideration, Brunson argues that there must be a penalty for violating oaths of office or else they are "not binding.
A "rigged election" is equivalent to war since both "put into power" a "victor," he argues, and therefore allegations of "a rigged election" must be investigated.
"The Oath of Office requires that aid and comfort cannot be given to those levying war through a rigged election," Brunson writes.
The Supreme Court is set to reconsider whether to hear a lawsuit alleging President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, former Vice President Mike Pence, 291 House members, and 94 senators violated their oaths of office by refusing to investigate evidence of fraud in the 2020 election before certifying Biden as the victor on Jan. 6, 2021, allowing for Biden and Harris to be "fraudulently" inaugurated.You don't really have to wait for a decision from the Court, the answer is no.
Although someone should arrest those named in the article, the supremes would need to arrest themselves should the money be pulled from the Union of lamestream media, supremes, congresscritters and executive branch.