Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security’s retirement age is moving to 67. Some experts say that could go even higher
CNBC ^ | 3 April 2022 | Lorie Konish

Posted on 02/07/2023 7:21:17 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Many Americans eagerly look forward to a time when they can stop working and officially set their status to “retired.” But when asked what age they anticipate that could be, there isn’t a consensus. The average age when people say they hope to retire is 62, according to one survey.

SNIP

Meanwhile, the House of Representatives last week approved a retirement bill that would push out the age for required minimum distributions on certain savings accounts to 75, up from the current age of 72. That change, if it passes the Senate, would be gradually phased in by 2032.

SNIP

Retirement ages were last altered in 1983 under then-President Ronald Reagan. Those changes, which raised the full retirement age to 67 from 65, are still being phased in today. Even just the bump up to age 66 from 65 represented a 5% benefit cut, Elsasser noted.

Read more at the link.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: age; entitlementspending; goingnowhere; medicare; ponzischeme; retirement; security; social; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: Governor Dinwiddie

A lot of nice graphs:

https://www.macrotrends.net/charts/stock-indexes


41 posted on 02/07/2023 8:07:10 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
And if you want to retire at 65, retire at 65. You’ll still get Social Security. Just not quite as much as you would at 67.

If I were to retire at 65, my income from my job after $20,000 would be taxed at a 50% rate. For every $2 earned above that income cap (about $20,000), one's SS benefits are reduced by $1. Is that what you are proposing that I do? And, the side job I do would further increase that income above the $20,000 rate. After having them take all of that money from me for years, it is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. What enfuriates me is that due to health concerns, I need to retire, but working to try and pay bills would be pointless when I large portion of it would essentially cause me to lose almost all of my SS benefits. Then, I read in the news that they are sending BILLIONS to Ukraine. Your turn...

42 posted on 02/07/2023 8:08:32 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

(Joe, DJT, BO)
https://www.macrotrends.net/2613/stock-market-performance-by-president-from-election-date

1948 on
https://www.macrotrends.net/2574/dow-to-gdp-ratio-chart


43 posted on 02/07/2023 8:13:35 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Learn something new every day.   I had assumed that because I was penalized 13½% for going early earlier than 66, I assumed the next year of birth was 67 years old.
44 posted on 02/07/2023 8:15:24 PM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

The government needs money to pay for illegal aliens and fentanyl to flood across our secure border. In addition to financing wars across the globe and investing heavily in alternative energy sources that clearly aren’t ready for prime time.
The old people can sign up for euthanasia if they don’t like it, of course.


45 posted on 02/07/2023 8:20:19 PM PST by JerseyDvl (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound
#11 At 67 years 6 months I would get a bit over $2,000 a month. At 70 I would get $2,600+.

True, but starting at 70 you also wouldn't get the first 30 payments of $2,000.

46 posted on 02/07/2023 8:21:11 PM PST by Interesting Times (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

“These tools can be accurate but require access to your official earnings record in our database.”

https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/calculators/

“In the case of early retirement, a benefit is reduced 5/9 of one percent for each month before normal retirement age, up to 36 months. If the number of months exceeds 36, then the benefit is further reduced 5/12 of one percent per month.”

“Delayed retirement credit
Year of birth Credit per year
1917-24 3.0%
1925-26 3.5%
1927-28 4.0%
1929-30 4.5%
1931-32 5.0%
1933-34 5.5%
1935-36 6.0%
1937-38 6.5%
1939-40 7.0%
1941-42 7.5%
1943 and later 8.0%

https://www.ssa.gov/oact/quickcalc/early_late.html


47 posted on 02/07/2023 8:25:12 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

I am grabbing my S.S. at 62, I file in 2 months for auto deposit to kick in in November...let me ask all of you Freepers here? Have you ever done a trade/job that is always in demand yet you can get paid in cash or personal check? I have been doing these exact types of work since I was 18. I also worked on the books for what would reap me the best benefits. I will collect less than the maximum from S.S. but I am not worried in the least about earning going into my twilight years...there are multitudes of things you can do to generate cash without reporting it.


48 posted on 02/07/2023 8:28:33 PM PST by mythenjoseph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I feel the same way.


49 posted on 02/07/2023 8:30:43 PM PST by avenir ("They sang His praise...they soon forgot His works")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

“ Imagine if all your SS payroll taxes had been invested in an index fund. ”

Revolution would happen if people understood that .


50 posted on 02/07/2023 8:32:19 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Have you seen Joe Biden's picture on a milk carton?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

I wonder how much money they could raise if they stopped these millions of invaders at the border, gave them Social Security numbers, and required them and their employers to pay into the system, instead of just vanishing into the country, to work for cash and not report their income.
Probably a lot of money.


51 posted on 02/07/2023 8:33:06 PM PST by Deo volente ("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

The average lifespan in the US was 77.28 years in 2020, so on average with the the current SS:
So on average retiring at 62 with a reduced benefit you have 15 years to get paid back what you paid in to SS.
At 67 full retirement you have 10 years on average.

It’s money you paid in, not welfare. It was a good idea, but poor implementation, and with our government they just spend it all anyway, no investment, no saving for a rainy day. The just keep spending into a hole, raise the debt ceiling, borrow more, spend more, send more money we don’t have to Ukraine and everywhere else. Rinse and repeat


52 posted on 02/07/2023 8:34:41 PM PST by aklurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Gen X and later all already know that there will NOT be Social Security for us. The treasure chest is due to run out in 2035.


53 posted on 02/07/2023 8:41:23 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

Amen.


54 posted on 02/07/2023 8:59:29 PM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
Most people are highly advantaged if they delay SS retirement benefits till age 70 anyway, ...

The trick in that equation is living that long. Many if not most are in poor health or dead by 70. They're definitely not as mobile as in their younger days. Me, probably take it at FRA.

55 posted on 02/07/2023 9:21:44 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Got all sorts of money for illegal aliens, welfare mommas, drug adults in tue streets, and Ukraine; but Americans that have worked their whole price? Nope! Sorry! We’re “running out of money.” BS.


56 posted on 02/07/2023 9:37:43 PM PST by vpintheak (Live free, or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

It will be 72 by the time I retired.


57 posted on 02/07/2023 9:41:11 PM PST by political1 (Love your neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvie; usconservative

This article is from April of 2022. That’s what causes confusion about what might happen in the future versus what’s already happened.

Going forward in 2023, one idea that’s been floated by some Republicans in the House is that an increase in the debt ceiling should be tied to cuts in Social Security. Cutting benefits to current recipients is deemed unfeasible, so the idea is instead a further increase in the retirement age. My guess is that the whole Republican caucus won’t go along with this, but who knows.


58 posted on 02/07/2023 10:10:50 PM PST by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

It puts the Dems in quite a pickle. They want to save FICA by raising the cap (as was done on medicare) but the only way to get GOP votes is to raise the age (as was done in 1986). And the Dems don’t want to raise the age because it hurts blue collar workers in physically demanding jobs. A bit ironic as these workers now uniformly vote for GOP, and the white collar workers (who can easily work past 67) vote for the Rats.

GOP needs to exercise care here so as not to be accused of “cutting benefits” as Biden lied tonight.


59 posted on 02/07/2023 11:00:32 PM PST by KingofZion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Maybe people with soft jobs. Mine was manual.


60 posted on 02/07/2023 11:09:56 PM PST by roving ( Pronouns- libs/suk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson