Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security’s retirement age is moving to 67. Some experts say that could go even higher
CNBC ^ | 3 April 2022 | Lorie Konish

Posted on 02/07/2023 7:21:17 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Many Americans eagerly look forward to a time when they can stop working and officially set their status to “retired.” But when asked what age they anticipate that could be, there isn’t a consensus. The average age when people say they hope to retire is 62, according to one survey.

SNIP

Meanwhile, the House of Representatives last week approved a retirement bill that would push out the age for required minimum distributions on certain savings accounts to 75, up from the current age of 72. That change, if it passes the Senate, would be gradually phased in by 2032.

SNIP

Retirement ages were last altered in 1983 under then-President Ronald Reagan. Those changes, which raised the full retirement age to 67 from 65, are still being phased in today. Even just the bump up to age 66 from 65 represented a 5% benefit cut, Elsasser noted.

Read more at the link.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: age; entitlementspending; goingnowhere; medicare; ponzischeme; retirement; security; social; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
This is what enrages me the MOST about the government. Nothing else comes close. The lawmakers who passed this legislation AND Reagan KNEW they would be dead and gone by 2020 when the folks affected would have to be 66 instead of 65 to retire. The PLANNED this so they would not have to face any criticism, kickback, etc.. So, to go off on the present Congress does not good, since they are not the ones who passed the law.

However, they are already planning to extend the retirement age again. Someone needs to wake up the younger people as to why there needs to be an out and out rebellion if such is even put on the table. It is literally indescribable to try and explain how it feels at a late age knowing you will face a 50% tax on income exceeding the Social Security cap if one earns over the income limit SSL puts on you for retiring early.

It must be DEMANDED THAT CONGRESS RETURN THE RETIREMENT AGE TO 65 AND IMPLEMENT TAXES OR WHATEVER TO PAY FOR IT!!! CONGRESS DOESN'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH THEIR RETIREMENT PLAN. THE RAGE FROM THIS LITTLE CORNER OF THE WORLD OVER THIS CAN NOT BE DESCRIBED.

1 posted on 02/07/2023 7:21:17 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

It was a Ponzi scam from day one. They are merely extending the day in which it finally caves in. FDR bragged about how Republicans could not kill his scam in 100 years. Getting people use to being on the Government dole is how we got into our current mess.


2 posted on 02/07/2023 7:27:31 PM PST by Nateman (If Mohammad was not the Anti Christ Mad Moe definitely comes in as a Strong second..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Most people are highly advantaged if they delay SS retirement benefits till age 70 anyway, so a change from 65 to 66 to 67 would be irrelevant to many.


3 posted on 02/07/2023 7:28:11 PM PST by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

I would say there is a 99.9999% probability they will not lower the retirement age to 65. People are living longer so they will keep increasing the retirement age over time.

What is discouraging to me is how much they tax you simply for receiving your SS benefits.


4 posted on 02/07/2023 7:29:47 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

I believe that cutting the federal workforce by 50% and cutting the federal wages by 50% would allow the Soc Sec system to go back to its original age levels and be fully monetized...

In addition, remove/terminate all separate retirement systems for the politicians who vote on these kinds of laws and regulations...
Let them subsist on Soc Sec alone...


5 posted on 02/07/2023 7:32:20 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperatly need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Given the damage from the mRna, there will be far far fewer people getting any ss benefits.


6 posted on 02/07/2023 7:32:51 PM PST by Duke of Milan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

I don’t think that the Snowflake and Zero Generations care if there is Social Security or not when they grow up. Most plan on not working and can always do a GoFundMe page if something like a Beyonce concert with “unaffordable” tickets comes up and they need money to go.


7 posted on 02/07/2023 7:34:47 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Remember what FJB Brandon said, "...more than half of the women in my administration are women.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Imagine if all your SS payroll taxes had been invested in an index fund.

8 posted on 02/07/2023 7:35:10 PM PST by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
"Most people are highly advantaged if they delay SS retirement benefits till age 70 anyway, so a change from 65 to 66 to 67 would be irrelevant to many."

..... Well ... Isn't part of the plan also to move the maximum payed out age to 72 ... possibly higher instead of the current 70?

.

9 posted on 02/07/2023 7:35:13 PM PST by R_Kangel ("A nation of sheep will beget a nation ruled by wolves")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

This will be characterized as racist.


10 posted on 02/07/2023 7:36:45 PM PST by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

“Most people are highly advantaged if they delay SS retirement benefits till age 70 anyway, so a change from 65 to 66 to 67 would be irrelevant to many.”

I think for me the optimal time is my full retirement point of 66 years and eight months.

I think you get about an 8% decrease for each 12 months taking SS early, but only a 5% increase for delay past the full retirement point.


11 posted on 02/07/2023 7:36:46 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Original Social Security retirement age was 65 years old in 1938. Average age of death in1938 was 62 years old. Was a scam from day one.


12 posted on 02/07/2023 7:38:48 PM PST by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

.
What’s really important is that we spend Trillions to Ukraine,

And let’s Send more money to the Big Cities so they can continue to pay people not to work and spread the money around to Dem Non-profits and DA that like crime and criminals.

And we have to fatten the big unions - we have to get money to them. They vote.

We need BLM and Antifa programs in elementary and pre-school.

It’s very obvious what is important to them.


13 posted on 02/07/2023 7:38:59 PM PST by AnthonySoprano (Statute of Limitations is going to elapse on Hunter Biden )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

That’s what I had heard, but considering my health, the economy, the corrupt government, their plans on nuking SS, I decided that I’d rather take what I can get now while I can still get it than wait and be cheated out of it by the government.


14 posted on 02/07/2023 7:39:16 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

A single man who earned an average income and reaches average life expectancy will pay $405,000 into Social Security and Medicare and receive $573,000 in benefits.

Can’t beat that 1/2% interest rate.


15 posted on 02/07/2023 7:39:33 PM PST by hercuroc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Geez man, easy on the caps.

Social Security is a ponzi scheme. We all know it. Americans live longer, and there’s no free lunch. “Implement Taxes or whatever to pay for it”. There’s a Democrat talking point if I’ve ever heard one.

And if you want to retire at 65, retire at 65. You’ll still get Social Security. Just not quite as much as you would at 67.


16 posted on 02/07/2023 7:39:48 PM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Some occupations are more physically stressful than others.

People might be allowed to invest via their employer & Social Security in say their state pension fund or a mutual fund meeting SSA requirements.


17 posted on 02/07/2023 7:42:27 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

I retired in 2017 at the required age of 66. Medicare qualifiction was age 65.


18 posted on 02/07/2023 7:43:39 PM PST by citizen (Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people - John Adams 1798)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
FDR bragged about how Republicans could not kill his scam in 100 years.

That damned fascist knew he could buy almost everybody's soul with his evil scheme.

19 posted on 02/07/2023 7:44:40 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
What is discouraging to me is that there's no way to get out of the damned scheme. With very rare exceptions, we're all herded into it at gunpoint, and kept in it at gunpoint. Then we're supposed to be grateful for the crumbs they give us ... by robbing other people in our name.

It's disgusting.

20 posted on 02/07/2023 7:47:28 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson