Posted on 12/06/2022 11:03:54 AM PST by Red Badger
Apparently in our quest to make EVERYTHING racist, the Washington Post has now dubbed Discovery channel's popular "Shark Week" as racist for "lack of diversity" and featuring too many white men as experts.
Especially white men named Mike.
************************************************
The Washington Post @washingtonpost · Follow
Official Researchers say Discovery’s programming overwhelmingly featured White men as experts while emphasizing negative messages about sharks. washingtonpost.com ‘Shark Week’ lacks diversity, overrepresents men named Mike, scientists say The experts featured on Discovery's signature shark programming include more men named Mike than women, a recent study found. 3:11 AM · Dec 6, 2022
********************************************
You thought I was joking, didn't you? Here's a taste of the madness from WaPo:
Lisa Whitenack loved sharks as a kid. She spent rainy days leafing through a guide to sharks in Reader's Digest. Every summer, she would watch "Shark Week," Discovery's annual TV event that spotlights the ocean predator with seven days of dedicated programming.
But when the scientists appeared on her TV screen, she rarely saw any women she could look up to.
"Why would I know I could do that?" Whitenack said. "I don't come from a family of scientists. I didn't see very many people that looked like me on television."
This woman didn't see women shark experts on TV so her default was to assume "women can't research sharks"?
What kind of nonsense is this?
Since then, Lisa has gotten into the field of research but it seems less like she's researching shark and instead researching ways to be offended and carry out a weird sort of revenge on Discovery Network.
Whitenack led a team of researchers to examine hundreds of "Shark Week" episodes that aired between 1988 and 2020. In a study published last month by the Public Library of Science, their research claims that Discovery's programming emphasized negative messages about sharks, lacked useful messaging about shark conservation and overwhelmingly featured White men as experts — including several with the same name.
The programming featured more White experts and commentators named "Mike" than women, said David Shiffman, a conservationist at Arizona State University who was a co-author of the study.
So... Whitenack is just a bitter feminist who watches literal HOURS of Shark Seek so she can criticize the programming and carry out a hateful vendetta against a television program about sharks.
Wokeness is a mental disease.
But Whitenack and Bohannon agreed that the biggest concern was with the program's lack of diversity and how that might shape young scientists' perceptions of marine biology and whether they could enter the field.
"Diversity in people brings diversity in thought, which ultimately brings innovation," Bohannon said. "Being able to see someone who looks like you in this field really has an impact."
This is so mind-numbingly stupid it boggles the mind.
Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon summarizes the argument of the article quite well:
*****************************************************
Seth Dillon @SethDillon · Follow Sharks are good and safe. White men are not. Discovery owes everyone — especially any sharks who were offended — an apology. The Washington Post @washingtonpost
Official Researchers say Discovery’s programming overwhelmingly featured White men as experts while emphasizing negative messages about sharks. https://wapo.st/3P0ZoZa 10:33 AM · Dec 6, 2022
*******************************************
Don't let wokeness make you as dumb as The Washington Post.
Almost every TV ad has mixed couples and are ridiculous
There are no Great Black sharks. Just saying.
The smartest person I know is a white man named Mike.
Exactly! Great Whites are always the highlight! Racist sharks!!!!
Me too!................
Just laugh out loud at them. They look so confused when you do.
Seems as though she's not bright enough to be a good marine biologist then.
Yes, I’ve noticed a distinct lack of porpoises, whales, dolphins and swordfish on “Shark Week”. It’s really shameful.
Funny, I was just thinking that same thing.
Lisa Whitenack loved sharks as a kid. She spent rainy days leafing through a guide to sharks in Reader’s Digest. Every summer, she would watch “Shark Week,” Discovery’s annual TV event that spotlights the ocean predator with seven days of dedicated programming.
But when the scientists appeared on her TV screen, she rarely saw any women she could look up to.
—
This is total fabricated B.S. *Nobody* watching Shark Week gives a flip(per) about the commentators. You watch shark week for sharks. Big, scary sharks ripping prey to pieces.
We laugh at these morons, but they are deadly serious..............
Yep. I root for the sharks.....................
Scholarship and book sales used to drive what experts wound up in documentaries. Now race and gender seem to be the main drivers. I don’t bother watching anymore since I have zero interest in the fantasy land of woke jackasses.
Did this woman herself did obtain a marine biology degree? Spend 10 years on ships doing research? Defend her thesis to earn a PhD? Sounds like a hard “no” to all of that.
Like all commies, she want to steal the accomplishments of those that did, and pretend that’s OK because of “fairness”.
Then find a GD black who’s interested I sharks.
Come to think of it, find a black who’s interested in anything, besides sports and “music”.
“Diversity in people brings diversity in thought, which ultimately brings innovation,”
Uh ”thought “ varies according to race or gender? That sounds a tad racist and sexist to me.
the WaPo needed to fulfill its quota of woke articles for this week. There is no person who complains about Shark Week. She is a figment of the imagination of 57 WaPo monkeys with typewriters. All of the WaPo monkey employees are black or at a minimum gray. /s
Yes, but you do notice other things.
I’m sick of the BS that we can only “identify” (biggest buzzword these days) with some kind of person who is somehow like us on the surface.
I am a woman and while it would be extra interesting and fun when a woman shared my passion for cars (I DID and still do know one I worked for), or military history, etc, I was in no way deterred from continuing to love it all or pursue studies, or become an engineer.
Heck, that IS the identity - the common passion we have!
Bullshit.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.