Skip to comments.
Trump Suggests ‘Termination’ of U.S. Constitution Allowable over 2020 Twitter Scandal [UPDATE: The author is spinning. Trump's actual words are now posted below.]
Breitbart ^
| 12/03/2022
| Paul Bois
Posted on 12/03/2022 4:59:47 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Edited on 12/03/2022 7:07:49 PM PST by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Former President Donald Trump suggested the “termination” of the United States Constitution could be allowable in response to the bombshell report that the Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election.
The former president made his observation via his Truth Social account on Saturday following journalist Matt Taibbi’s thorough report on Twitter’s internal communications during the 2020 elections at the behest of newly-minted CEO Elon Musk.
The author of the Breitbart article above is spinning (lying). Here's what Trump actually posted.
See posts #58 and 59 below.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 1621; abrahamlincoln; braking; breitbart; constitution; desantis2024; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; evertrump; evertrumper; evertrumpers; evertrumpism; fakefreeperspinzone; fakenews; footmouth; freeperspin; freepersspinnothing; frspinzone; gopestablishment; hadenoughyet; insurrection; jan6; janefullkaren; magawithdesantis; mediawingofthednc; nevertrumpers; nevertrumpliars; nevertrumptruth; nonevertrumptruth; ownyourwords; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; paulbois; paulboisisaliar; presstitutes; rino; rinos; sickofityet; sidebarabuse; smearmachine; tds; terminatconstitut; termination; thankyoujimrob; trump; trump2024; trumpdidntsaythat; trumpgaffes; trusttheplan; twistinghiswords; twitter; uniparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 621-626 next last
Comment #461 Removed by Moderator
Comment #462 Removed by Moderator
Comment #463 Removed by Moderator
Comment #464 Removed by Moderator
Comment #465 Removed by Moderator
Comment #466 Removed by Moderator
Comment #467 Removed by Moderator
Comment #468 Removed by Moderator
Comment #469 Removed by Moderator
Comment #470 Removed by Moderator
Comment #471 Removed by Moderator
Comment #472 Removed by Moderator
Comment #473 Removed by Moderator
Comment #474 Removed by Moderator
Comment #475 Removed by Moderator
Comment #476 Removed by Moderator
Comment #477 Removed by Moderator
Comment #478 Removed by Moderator
Comment #479 Removed by Moderator
To: Williams
The point he was trying to make is that when the Constitution protects those who unlawfully steal elections, righting the wrong and installing the people’s choice as winner is more important than adhering to the constitution which enabled their theft.
For if the people are robbed of their choice by fraud, then the constitution is no longer protecting the peoples sacred rights, but instead is being perverted to protect the thieves who seek to subvert the will of the people.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 621-626 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson