Skip to comments.McCabe: AG Garland Sending ‘Very Loud Message’ to Trump DOJ Can Prove Seditious Conspiracy
Posted on 11/30/2022 5:14:02 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe said Wednesday on CNN’s “The Lead” that Attorney General Merrick Garland’s speech about the Oath Keepers’ conviction for seditious conspiracy in connection with the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot was a direct message to former President Donald Trump and those who worked with him that the Department of Justice can prove sedition.
Guest anchor Kasie Hunt said, “Let me ask you about what we saw in the trial. Do you think the events of the last 24 hours have changed the calculation for the Justice Department in terms of whether or not to prosecute the former president since they were able to secure this conviction?”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Let’s see what happens when they try and convict in a D.C. court.
Sure they can Andy...just like you proved Russian collusion.
McCabe knows a thing or two about sedition.
Lunatics are running the asylum.
It can be more easily proven that Garland is a traitor.
..... I don't think they could prove he wanted to ... Overthrow.... The government ... Trump was merely questioning and challenging the results of the election ..... What other people in attendance believed would have nothing to do with Trumps involvement .... Especially since 45 told them to proceede .... "Peacefully and Patriotically" ... His final Twitter tweets confirm his intent
I think the HUGE immediate show of support for DJT in the face of jack boots and machine guns at MAL has got them scared.
They hold all the cards, the question is whether Trump wants to stay in the game.
In a D.C. court they can convict Trump of dancing with too many angels on the head of a pin. Or any other thing they charge him with, such as illegally causing the sun to rise in the East.
They can’t and won’t even try.
The (not) special council is there to draw the nothing burger out, while collecting A paycheck.
What utter bullsh*t.
So, McCabe, as someone, actually, involved in seditious conspracy and treason, you would know.
bull fing shit
I'm just a country lawyer, but I think to be seditions, or to be an insurrection, you must have at least a theoretical possibility of succeeding.
If you introduce evidence of how long the processes of government were interrupted, I would do that by calling Nancy Pelosi to the stand. You start by asking her "For how many DECADES was the joint session vote delayed on January 6th?" As she sits there puzzled, you withdraw the questions and ask "Ms. Pelosi, then for how many YEARS was the vote delayed?" followed by months/weeks/days and finally hours. At some point even the most dim-witted juror gets the point.
It does not mean what was done was correct or justified, but it was not a sedition or an insurrection. I would describe it as a disorganized low-grade riot. But this threat to democracy bullshit is betrayed by the fact that the joint session resumed roughly 5 hours later. By definition, something that (seriously) threatens our democracy or the processes of government will not be recovered from that lightly.
D.C. is 95% Democrat.
He couldn’t possibly get a fair trail there.
Did they ‘prove’ sedition or conspiracy to commit sedition? I think there’s a difference. But no matter what D.O.J. might or might not have as evidence, Trump tried before a D.C. jury will be found guilty.
A DC court will convict Trump without the Prosecution even making a case.
Wasn’t PresidentTrump legally “the government” on Jan 6 2021?
He was trying to overthrow himself?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.