Posted on 11/29/2022 8:49:36 PM PST by RandFan
Oh, wait. Senators are simply glorified Representatives
since the passage of the 17th Amendment.
Never mind.
2 Peter 3:8-10: “But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.”
Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Rob Portman (Ohio), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Mitt Romney (Utah), Roy Blunt (Mo.), Cynthia Lummis (Wyo.), Richard Burr (N.C.), Shelley Moore Capito (W.Va.), Dan Sullivan (Alaska), Joni Ernst (Iowa) and Todd Young (Ind.).
12 more Rinos revealed.
They can’t legislate away inalienable rights, such as freedom of religion, which is exactly what they’re trying to do
/\
Revokes freedom of religion.
It’s even worse than that.
This also
revokes freedom of speach,
and outlaws Christianity
and establishes a state religion
of secular humanism imho.
4 birds with one weasel stone.
Retiring Roy Blunt (Mo.) showing his disdain for the conservative Christian people who voted for him all those years.
Then a lot of people are going to jail. Hopefully taking it to the Supreme Court and striking it down.
Look at what these “four republicans” are leaving as their Legacy.
I hope they never have a good night’s sleep.
MARRIAGE SHOULD BE TAKEN OUT OF...TAKEN OUT OF ANY GOVERNMENT.
THE “GOVERNMENT” SHOULD NOT BE INVOLVED WITH ANY OF IT.
There is no morality in gov. Marriage requires morality.
End of discussion
Had the bill been solely same-sex marriage, it might not have passed. But interracial is slam dunk okay.
We’ll continue to vote and pretend it matters.
As demonstrated, the GOP is more than willing to eviscerate rights when the alternative is an angry media.
I hope the law is promptly challenged in court. Much of it should fall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.