Hmmm, how does that work? You just scissor or something?
Posted on 11/29/2022 3:33:36 PM PST by Coronal
Hmmm, how does that work? You just scissor or something?
All marriage has been from the beginning of time is the Union of a male and female to bring children into the world by the act of sexual intercourse. Man is the highest of all animal species but all species require male and female. There is no other way. Two homosexual men can’t produce a baby thru anal intercourse and two lesbians are not producing a baby by one strapping on a dildo and penetrating the other.
Same-sex “marriage” is an oxymoron. It does not exist. Call it what it is. Two people of the same sex can not consummate a marriage and can’t bring children into the world by act of procreation. They can have their “Civil Unions” but they will never be married. Homo activists know this and it drives them crazy.
Special?
You saying two senior citizens past the age of childbearing shouldn’t get married? Why not?
Remember when queers said they just wanted to be left alone in the privacy in own homes?
There is no such thing as gay marriage , it can’t exist. No matter what the government says it doesn’t change reality.
... and if a church speaks out against same sex marriage, said church could be found in violation and have it’s tax exempt status taken away.
I think that part was removed, but it was part of the plan for sure.
BINGO!!
The parts of DOMA that allowed states to not recognize marriages that are valid in other states would seem to be clearly unconstitutional since marriage is a power reserved to the states and by the Full Faith and Credit clause, states must recognize marriages contracted in other states.
The bill only applies to couples.
Exactly.
How many senators did Romney knock over to be the first to vote for fags?
Go back and read then opinions on the marriage case and the same point is made but now suddenly it’s something to panic about because Roe was ended.
“ Thomas was only pointing out that, in his opinion, the marriage decisions could be revisited because they depended on similar flawed justification as Roe”
I understand, but it wasn’t prudent to discuss that. His comment had no effect on the Dobbs decision, there was no need to even raise the point. It simply gave ammunition and momentum to the Dems in the election and now, to pass the anti-Christian “marriage” law
If you're against the bill, obviously you are a racist against inter-racial marriage. Nothing about perversion.
So, if a church now refuses to recognize or conduct a perverted "marriage", it would be deemed illegal and racist.
Republicans Roy Blunt, Richard Burr, Shelley Moore Capito, Susan Collins, Joni Ernst, Cynthia Lummis, Lisa Murkowski, Rob Portman, Mitt Romney, Dan Sullivan, Thom Tillis and Todd Young voted for the bill.
What about respect for Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Bahai, etc, etc, etc.? This country was founded on the Old and New Testaments and its principals and laws so derived.
From what I’ve been told (haven’t researched personally) the purpose of this legislation is to force church’s to marry and to force business’ to “bake the cake” . If true, it’s awful.
Good luck selling that notion here.
It’s not true. The bill explicitly gives exceptions to churches and other religious organizations. Don’t buy into hysteria.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.