PA Defies Supreme Court Over Mail In Ballots

Twitter via WSJ ^ | 10/26/2022 | Jack Posbiec

[Braak]

The state of PA has stated they will refuse an order from the US Supreme Court and include undated mail-in ballots in the vote count

This sets up a constitutional crisis for PA elections this year

[skeeter]

Point taken. We all need to stop speaking in terms of political parties when most republican office holders are invested in the same system as are the rats.

[Destroyer Sailor]

Not much. The Democrats talk about rule of law. They do nothing about it unless it serves their purpose.

[DesertRhino]

That won’t happen because the executive branch was seized in a stolen election putsch in 2020. The Supreme Court cannot do a thing about it, and the DOJ is in the hands of the putsch.

[cicero2k]

When a reporter asked Trump about the White House source calling Covid the “Kung Flu”, Trump asked “who said that”? The reporter meekly shut up.

[ConservativeInPA]

Names please

I guess The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania doesn’t work for you.

[Starboard]

Republicans are big on rhetoric. Not so much on results.

[Deo volente]

We no longer live in a constitutional Republic where the rule of law matters. It’s a radical ‘democracy’ where the Democrats in power do whatever they want. They simply ignore judicial rulings which go against their wishes.

Hat tip to Victor Davis Hanson who recently described this whole process in detail.
We’re in deep trouble, folks, but I’m merely stating the obvious.

[Magnum44]

No, it doesnt. There are people making these statements. They should not be allowed to hide behind a title.

[DarthVader]

It got the zot!!!

[DarthVader]

More than that!

[joe fonebone]

I disagree..
The republiCANT’s and democommies know they are going to lose...bigly..
Soooo...
Let’s invalidate the election

[ConservativeInPA]

I understand what you meant in your first post. I don’t have an answer so I poked fun at the WSJ.

[libertylover]

And when someone files suit because they were cheated, the Supreme Court will rule they don’t have “standing”.

[Sacajaweau]

They’re talking about 43 ballots...of course it could really be 5,043 ballots.

[Magnum44]

:)

[hflynn]

Did this happen before or after last nights debate?

It is over for Fetterman and they can't steal this one after last night.

[Mr. N. Wolfe]

Democrats: Whatever it takes. The ends justify the means.

[lodi90]

This is a real “threat to democracy” and “insurrection”.