Posted on 09/20/2022 12:34:50 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Of course mens' taste in women isn't any better.
And what is it with Negro grooming? Once upon a time Negro men were well groomed snappy dressers, even the poor ones. Now they are indistinguishable from drunks in an alley.
This guy was not married to her. He is not their father. He is nothing to those girls. He had no business in their lives. The mother wanted him around for her. Not for the kids.
The story is about the kids not him not the mother. The kids depend on the mother to keep them safe. They do not depend on this strange man to behave himself. As evidenced.
Mothers job is protect her kids
Is she supposed to tell the kids it was the guys fault for being a violent idiot?
Or tell them she won’t let any strange man into their lives again?
“ Lay this “single mom” krap on Lyndon Johnson”
I am not a democrat. I do not put any of my personal choices onto others and not on politicians. And not on democrat presidents.
People make their own choices they can try to blame government but it won’t work.
Poor babies…
I can understand a woman’s first mistake, surrendering her motherhood to a man that is not wanting to commit to her, but I can’t understand the crazy boyfriends after that.
The psychology gets screwed up into “ I want a man” instead of “I want a man whom I love and who loves me and who wants to be, and can be, a good husband and father”. The later has to be a giant priority over the former.
More unintended 19th amendment fallout ....
Those poor kids shouldn’t have to defend their idiot mother from her very poor choices in men. She wanted whatever non-evident “charms” he had to offer her without considering that he might present a danger to those tiny girls. She is both STUPID beyond belief and selfish.
Peak hormone stage.
I blame the mother because SHE is the person who let this idiot around her kids... PERIOD.
I see this stupid crap again and again. My kids come first? Really, if they came first why do you let some douchebag around them?
Want to increase the likelihood your child will be sexually molested 100 fold, if not more... bring your “boyfriend” around them.
No, its not FAIR... but if you are a single mother, you should assume EVERY SINGLE MAN YOU MEET is a potential negative to your kids lives.. period... IF you really put your kids first, you keep that out of their lives.
If I got involved with a single woman who had kids, and she wanted me around her kids quickly I’d walk away. That’s wrong on so many levels.. no idea if it will work out, so puts your kids (especially if they are young) in a situation where they can bond and then see that man walk away through no fault of their own.. That’s A HUGE RED FLAG FOR ME... and no woman should be doing it (Or single father either)...
Have your boyfriend, have someone watch the kids while you get your adult time, but bringing them around your kids? Nope.
Does it work out, sure it does sometimes.. but I watch women just do stupid stuff again and again in this situation... He says he wants to meet your kids... OF COURSE HE DOES.. HE KNOWS THEY ARE IMPORTANT TO OU AND HE LIKES GETTING HIS D*CK WET, Why would he say anything else? Does that mean he SHOULD be around your kids?
If you are not to a point where you are considering getting engaged to someone, they really shouldn’t be around your kids, period.... Get to that point then you need to cross that bridge.. your kids have no business being around your boyfriends.
Not playing these stupid make excuses for it game... YOu can play that PC stupidity all you want, I will have no part of it. Have your boyfriend, go out with him... have someone watch your kids while you go out on dates, but they really have no business being around your kids, you are putting them at risk, in all kinds of ways, physically and emotionally if you are letting the men you date around your children.
“I can understand a woman’s first mistake, surrendering her motherhood to a man that is not wanting to commit to her, but I can’t understand the crazy boyfriends after that.”
That debate topic is off topic, though
The story is not about a relationship. It’s about 2 six year old girls defending their mother against a violent man that the mother brought in to their home. Welcomed him. It’s about the kids
Why do people ignore how this destruction of innocence. The culturally accepted trauma affects kids.
That’s my point
People say this guy shouldn’t act violently.
But he does. So there’s no point. He’s Already living out his own reaction to whatever trauma he’s sustained.
Women invite strangers into their lives and it’s never been done before. And they invite strangers into their childrens lives
All kids want is to have 2 parents. Who love each other.
Yet people put that aside. And then they wonder what is going on to destroy our cities and our culture.
Destruction of the family. Traumatizing kids.
The worst thing a kid can hear: 'Kids meet my new boyfriend.'
Don't you love those hairstyles for black criminals nowadays? It looks like he puts a finger into a light socket...
Okay, I’ll be the one to ask this question...
Was this really a physical attack, or was he yelling?
Because he was charged with threatening to commit violence and marijuana possession. And, if he really wanted to hurt someone, two little girls weren’t going to stop him.
>>> I pray for those children. I hope this truly stupid woman wises up.<<<
I doubt she will. She will probably go right back to him when he’s released.
Look, I’m not saying she is innocent here. My sole point is that not one of you, not one, puts any blame or responsibility on this guy. Stop blaming victims, even if they contribute to the situation. Put the blame on the actual perpetrator. Stop with the virtuos arm-chair quarterbacking.
My point was not off topic.
It was the mother’s errors in her relationships that led to the damger she put herself in, and the impact of that damger on her innocent kids. From somewhere thank G-d the kids found the courage to try to protect their mom. It will still be a factor, and possibly a negative one (trust issues), going forward in their innocent lives.
“My point was not off topic.”
Yes it was. Here’s what you said:
“I can understand a woman’s first mistake, surrendering her motherhood to a man that is not wanting to commit to her, but I can’t understand the crazy boyfriends after that.”
Now you’re changing it saying you said this:
“It was the mother’s errors in her relationships that led to the damger she put herself in, and the impact of that damger on her innocent kids.”
People literally cannot make points and stick to a debate
Is it poor math education? Lack of socializing growing up? Lack of playing sports, keeping an eye on the ball? Other players? The score?
Stop wasting my time.
Stop wasting everyone’s time.
My explanation of my first comments was not divorced from them.
Reason alone clearly implies the living state of the children is and was directly related to the life choices of the mother and that state cannot be devorced from the life choices of the mother. Trying to do so is simply denial. Minus the bad life choices of the mother, you do not get to the status and condition of the children. Her choices were the cause and their condition just one of the ill effects.
No. You were talking about the motivations of the perpetrator
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.