“My point was not off topic.”
Yes it was. Here’s what you said:
“I can understand a woman’s first mistake, surrendering her motherhood to a man that is not wanting to commit to her, but I can’t understand the crazy boyfriends after that.”
Now you’re changing it saying you said this:
“It was the mother’s errors in her relationships that led to the damger she put herself in, and the impact of that damger on her innocent kids.”
People literally cannot make points and stick to a debate
Is it poor math education? Lack of socializing growing up? Lack of playing sports, keeping an eye on the ball? Other players? The score?
Stop wasting my time.
Stop wasting everyone’s time.
My explanation of my first comments was not divorced from them.
Reason alone clearly implies the living state of the children is and was directly related to the life choices of the mother and that state cannot be devorced from the life choices of the mother. Trying to do so is simply denial. Minus the bad life choices of the mother, you do not get to the status and condition of the children. Her choices were the cause and their condition just one of the ill effects.