Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden threatens a ‘consequential’ response if Russia turns to unconventional weapons.
NY Times ^ | September 17, 2022

Posted on 09/17/2022 3:48:31 AM PDT by McGruff

President Biden has once again warned President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia against using unconventional or nuclear weapons to try to turn the tide of the war in Moscow’s favor, saying that such an action would “change the face of war unlike anything since World War II.”

Speaking in an interview with the CBS News program “60 Minutes” that is scheduled to air on Sunday, Mr. Biden said that the United States’ response would be “consequential,” though he declined to go into detail.

“You think I would tell you if I knew exactly what it would be? Of course I’m not going to tell you. It’ll be consequential,” Mr. Biden said

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: biden; chechens; chechnya; china; concerntroll; concerntrolls; deadrussianhomos; deadrussians; deathtochechnya; deathtoputin; deathtorussia; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; dodindustrialcomplex; globalistpropaganda; hateamericafirst; kabukitheater; ntsa; pedosforputin; putin; putinlovertrollsonfr; putinsbuttboys; putinworshippers; russia; russianaggression; russianhomos; russiansuicide; scottritter; taiwan; ukraine; vladtheimploder; warmonger; whyishenotbanned; whyishestillhere; xi; zottherussiantrolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: AndyJackson

“Our” vital interests in Ukraine are Biden trying to keep his deep corruption partnership with Ukraine leadership a secret from the rest of the world.


61 posted on 09/17/2022 6:07:44 AM PDT by Gaffer (Infidel, and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Another attempt by the Biden regime, with help from the media, to deflect people’s attention from Biden’s abysmal record prior to the midterm election.


62 posted on 09/17/2022 6:08:43 AM PDT by Flick Lives (FJB and the corrupt FBI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

I JUST READ A PIECE ABOUT THE us USING BIOWEAPONS IN THE Korean WAR. IF TRUE, COULDN’T THE RUSSIAN USE THEM IN UKRAINE? Was it all Commie Propaganda? I am starting to doubt my own FBI/CIA Government’s word. A good plague in Europe might really set back their war effort.


63 posted on 09/17/2022 6:09:44 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade ( Ride to the sound of the Guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Yes we can.


64 posted on 09/17/2022 6:21:43 AM PDT by TreasonObserver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TreasonObserver

Yes we can what?


65 posted on 09/17/2022 6:23:22 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: cranked; SERKIT

I hate when purposes are intensive.


66 posted on 09/17/2022 6:27:59 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

People use both.
But yet, for some, instead of contributing to a discussion, the thing to do is act a the grammar police.
Got it.

“It may not pass the editorial process but it is not uncommon for you to encounter the use of for all intensive purposes both in speech and in print.”

‘For all intents and purposes vs. for all intensive purposes’
https://www.englishgrammar.org/intents-purposes-intensive-purposes/

Don’t get stuck on stupid; we have enough of it in this current world, kthx.


67 posted on 09/17/2022 6:34:31 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Did he bare his gross fake teeth, squint, ball his little hands into shaking fists and whisper that threat to Putin?


68 posted on 09/17/2022 6:41:54 AM PDT by Pigsley (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pigsley

Heh, not sure.
Probably issued from his Delaware White House......


69 posted on 09/17/2022 6:43:45 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

I saw the FBI/DOJ/FISA up to their eyeballs in the successful insurrectionist coup. I saw what the FBI did to MLK, what they’re doing to anyone of influence connected to MAGA. I absolutely know we don’t know the full scope of the FBI involvement in the assassination of JFK. Was the FBI capable of ordering the hit on Kennedy? I think so. Is the current FBI capable of “doctoring Trump to death” or some such other scheme. ABSOLUTELY!


70 posted on 09/17/2022 6:48:43 AM PDT by hardspunned (former GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Your sense of humor is broken. Enjoy your day.


71 posted on 09/17/2022 6:49:46 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: cranked

“The only dipsh*ts talking about or even invoking non-conventional weapons is the US and the EU, gaslighting mofos!”

Liz Truss virtually promised using them a few weeks ago but has been quieter since. I suspect she’s been shown some simulations as to what happens to London in an exchange with Russian hardware (hint, London doesn’t fare very well). Might be worth showing the same to some of the Neocons running the West.


72 posted on 09/17/2022 6:55:52 AM PDT by BobL (By the way, low tonight in Estonia: 46 degrees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Read what you wrote that you said we can’t do. Then you have your answer. Pissant


73 posted on 09/17/2022 6:57:47 AM PDT by TreasonObserver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Agree. No doubt we have American “advisers” in there helping to train on the weapons along with coordinating real time intelligence.


74 posted on 09/17/2022 7:09:53 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Aw shutup, ya Pervert


75 posted on 09/17/2022 7:17:45 AM PDT by goodnesswins (The Chinese are teaching calculus to their 3rd graders while ours are trying to pick a pronoun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

British movie “Threads” from 1984. I couldn’t even watch the whole thing. It was so upsetting.


76 posted on 09/17/2022 7:32:48 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
"Biden threatens a ‘consequential’ response"

Yes, he will instruct the FIB to harass Mr. Mypillow even more.


77 posted on 09/17/2022 7:37:54 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free, the USA will never have equal justice under the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

What’s he going to do? Pull down his pants and moon them?


78 posted on 09/17/2022 7:51:47 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Socialism should more accurately be called Sociopathism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cranked

The CIA spirit is thick in here lately.....


79 posted on 09/17/2022 8:26:25 AM PDT by blackberry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Radix

Well, remember when the Captain of the USS Roosevelt said
to the SanFran tootie fruity press (in published communications there, without clearing anything with Command and Control)— “We aren’t at war with China!”

The meme works for dems because hitlery and obamaumao started all this... Russia Russia (Trump is russian agent, etc all proven false, but demonizes him while they threaten a COUNTRY! Russia). This is a CHINA CHINA operation and JoeBama is reciting crap he has no comprehension of— scripted by his Chi-Com/obamaumao embed handlers— who politically WANT to provoke Putin. It is not working and will be plainly visible as the real encirclement begins in the Donbas.

The scam payoff of all our mil hardware and money is soon to dry up— meanwhile US citizens are suffering because of this MORON in chief. Corrupt and stupid.


80 posted on 09/17/2022 8:26:47 AM PDT by John S Mosby ( Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson