Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/24/2022 5:19:32 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

Biden has been caught in a big flat lie. He is the man behind this hunt.


2 posted on 08/24/2022 5:23:25 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Actually, biden was wondering why there are a bunch of boxes laying around?
He’s also wondering when he gets to go on a vacation?


4 posted on 08/24/2022 5:26:58 AM PDT by Leep (Hillary will NEVER be president! 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Payback for talking about hunter. He is doing exactly what he accused trump of doing. The difference is that Biden actually gave the order, Trump groused in public but never gave it. Also - he has a complicit doj/fbi


5 posted on 08/24/2022 5:28:07 AM PDT by laxcoach (The secret to happiness is a bait pen full of pinfish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

So if Trump gets re-elected or Desantis, they can order an FBI raid on Obama and gather every document he has?


6 posted on 08/24/2022 5:36:07 AM PDT by DOGHEAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The white house and doj are acting like they have unlimited power forever. We’ll see about that.


7 posted on 08/24/2022 5:36:59 AM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The FBI has become Biden’s Gestapo with the job of investigating and harassing his political opposition.


9 posted on 08/24/2022 5:40:21 AM PDT by Spok (Ask a liberal to explain the rule of law as applied to DJT, then Hunter Biden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Wall added that the Justice Department “has advised me that there is no precedent for an assertion of executive privilege by a former President against an incumbent President to prevent the latter from obtaining … Presidential records"

Because it's outrageous and no administration had ever dared to enter such waters before this current administration.

10 posted on 08/24/2022 5:40:26 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (We are already in a revolutionary period, and the Rule of Law means nothing. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Hopefully they are freaking out over what was discovered. Hopefully it was discovered that they really do have it all and nothing can stop the consequences.


18 posted on 08/24/2022 5:59:05 AM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

haul....


24 posted on 08/24/2022 6:12:47 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

By federal law a copy of each document must be preserved.

It is quite likely that in 2025 a President DeSantis can have them stamped declassified and released for publication.

An official federal document calling Kim a ‘rocket boy’ may be “sensitive”, but that’s not something anyone would consider secret.


30 posted on 08/24/2022 6:35:07 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The federal government should have already had a copy of each document taken from Trump.

There was no need to snatch Trump’s copies.


31 posted on 08/24/2022 6:37:26 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Why did they need the records for government business?
That business can’t be to hide criminal behavior from the FBI or from a former Vice President. That business can’t be to limit civil liability for illegal behavior. That isn’t legal, or it least it didn’t used to be.

Basically, since the records were 100% digital, and ALL those records and images were available to the government, it’s a LIE to say they needed them to conduct government business.

They needed those records to prevent Trump from exposing them in civil court and to the public. That is a non-starter for broad “search and seizures”. They (Biden, democrats, DOJ and FBI ect.) know this already. However it scored big points with the Trump haters. Democrats love Fascism as long as they are running it.


35 posted on 08/24/2022 6:53:11 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

nypost.com

What did Biden ‘really’ know about the drive to raid Mar-a-Lago?
By Post Editorial Board
August 23, 2022 6:54pm Updated

A newly-released letter shows that President Joe Biden knew Attorney General Merrick Garland had authorized the FBI raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home.

The official line spun by the White House is that President Joe Biden and his staff had no clue Attorney General Merrick Garland had authorized the armed FBI raid on ex-Prez Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home until after it actually happened.

But it turns out they at least enabled and knew about the ongoing investigation.

A now-public May 10 letter to Team Trump from acting National Archivist Debra Steidel Wall notes that the president’s counsel had told her: “President Biden defers to my determination” on respecting Trump’s claims of executive privilege in retaining various documents — and that she had “decided not to honor” those claims.

SEE ALSO
Joe Biden; Donald Trump.
Biden called in FBI to look at first haul of classified Trump documents
She adds: “NARA will provide the FBI access to the records in question, as requested by the incumbent President.”

That is, Biden told the National Archives and Records Administration, or NARA, it could go ahead demand more documents. Is that really the last time the White House got involved?

Wall’s letter led to a June meeting where Trump’s aides handed the FBI a bunch of documents, on top of the January handover of other docs.

The many mysteries here include: Why exactly did Garland then go for the raid, when Trump had been turning over docs regularly?

How did NARA get involved in the first place? The DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled back in 2012: “NARA does not have the authority to designate materials as presidential records, and NARA lacks any right, duty, or means to seize control of them.”

SEE ALSO

Trump files motion asking for special master to go through documents seized from Mar-a-Lago
Above all else, what the heck is in the documents? Unless and until the public gets some hard facts that justify the raid, it’s supposed to just trust an AG who at White House request has sicced the FBI on parents who speak out at school-board meetings?

Meanwhile, the Justice Department is arguing in public to keep everything secret. But the AG’s minions are constantly leaking anonymously (and thus unverifiably) about parts of the case to friendly media. One day they float a claim that nuclear secrets are at stake, another day a count of 300-plus total “secret” docs that the FBI has now taken.

The New York Times reported back in April that Biden has been telling his aides that he wants Garland to indict Trump for something. That doesn’t help us believe the White House’s official “we know nothing” stance, but maybe this anonymous leak was enough to ensure the AG would know his boss’ wishes.


38 posted on 08/24/2022 7:07:23 AM PDT by Liz (MAN PROPOSES....GOD DISPOSES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

And, shutdown the Post’s twitter account in 5, 4, 3, 2 . . .


40 posted on 08/24/2022 7:22:35 AM PDT by MCSETots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; ..
So, the FBI can browse "top secret" documents?

41 posted on 08/24/2022 8:11:29 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Biden doing another look over there to get the heat of his screw up it’s going to fun to see the new movie coming out next month about him and Hunter.

Title
My Son Hunter

Newsmax may have it streaming


42 posted on 08/24/2022 8:14:21 AM PDT by Vaduz ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Remember when the Clinton White House sicced the FBI on Billy R. Dale in Travelgate? That was 29 years this past May. Nothing has changed since then. The FBI is still a willing tool for the evil Democrats to destroy innocent people’s lives.


43 posted on 08/24/2022 8:20:10 AM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

p


47 posted on 08/24/2022 10:30:43 AM PDT by bitt ( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

48 posted on 08/24/2022 10:37:32 AM PDT by null and void (they promise the jetsons but deliver the flintstones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I’m thinking now that FBI and Beijing Biden are concerned with what DJT is going to put in his Library.


50 posted on 08/24/2022 1:26:12 PM PDT by Rappini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson