Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

nypost.com

What did Biden ‘really’ know about the drive to raid Mar-a-Lago?
By Post Editorial Board
August 23, 2022 6:54pm Updated

A newly-released letter shows that President Joe Biden knew Attorney General Merrick Garland had authorized the FBI raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home.

The official line spun by the White House is that President Joe Biden and his staff had no clue Attorney General Merrick Garland had authorized the armed FBI raid on ex-Prez Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home until after it actually happened.

But it turns out they at least enabled and knew about the ongoing investigation.

A now-public May 10 letter to Team Trump from acting National Archivist Debra Steidel Wall notes that the president’s counsel had told her: “President Biden defers to my determination” on respecting Trump’s claims of executive privilege in retaining various documents — and that she had “decided not to honor” those claims.

SEE ALSO
Joe Biden; Donald Trump.
Biden called in FBI to look at first haul of classified Trump documents
She adds: “NARA will provide the FBI access to the records in question, as requested by the incumbent President.”

That is, Biden told the National Archives and Records Administration, or NARA, it could go ahead demand more documents. Is that really the last time the White House got involved?

Wall’s letter led to a June meeting where Trump’s aides handed the FBI a bunch of documents, on top of the January handover of other docs.

The many mysteries here include: Why exactly did Garland then go for the raid, when Trump had been turning over docs regularly?

How did NARA get involved in the first place? The DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled back in 2012: “NARA does not have the authority to designate materials as presidential records, and NARA lacks any right, duty, or means to seize control of them.”

SEE ALSO

Trump files motion asking for special master to go through documents seized from Mar-a-Lago
Above all else, what the heck is in the documents? Unless and until the public gets some hard facts that justify the raid, it’s supposed to just trust an AG who at White House request has sicced the FBI on parents who speak out at school-board meetings?

Meanwhile, the Justice Department is arguing in public to keep everything secret. But the AG’s minions are constantly leaking anonymously (and thus unverifiably) about parts of the case to friendly media. One day they float a claim that nuclear secrets are at stake, another day a count of 300-plus total “secret” docs that the FBI has now taken.

The New York Times reported back in April that Biden has been telling his aides that he wants Garland to indict Trump for something. That doesn’t help us believe the White House’s official “we know nothing” stance, but maybe this anonymous leak was enough to ensure the AG would know his boss’ wishes.


38 posted on 08/24/2022 7:07:23 AM PDT by Liz (MAN PROPOSES....GOD DISPOSES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Liz; LS; SunkenCiv; Red Badger; BenLurkin; Lazamataz; MHGinTN; SJackson

So, this entire charade then is based SOLELY on the Acting NARA director deciding that “she” needs the documents “everyday”, for the continuing operation of the government “.

BS.


52 posted on 08/24/2022 6:51:05 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson