Posted on 08/21/2022 7:33:59 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz on Sunday defended former President Donald Trump after the FBI seized documents from the former commander-in-chief’s Mar-a-Lago home.
Dershowitz emphasized on Fox News Channel’s “MediaBuzz” that he voted against Trump twice and was “looking forward” to doing it again but said the FBI engaged in an “improper search” to obtain documents.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
A lot of Jews look Jewish.
I wasn’t going for looks, but rather how Dersh feels about governments and power.
What you said was, He looks like a Bernie guy.
I’ll try to be more explicit...
HE APPEARS TO BE A GUY WHO WOULD WANT GOVERNMENT TO BE MORE INVOLVED IN OUR LIVES.
He has to say he voted against Trump because he is neck deep in with Epstein
Ditto here! If he were intellectually honest, if he had integrity and were principled he would be horrified with what Biden/Democrat Party are doing to the United States of America. It is obvious that he is intellectually dishonest, has little integrity and lacks principles. He is a whore selling a book ironically titled, “The Price of Principle”.
You are right to question Dersh’s motives.
If there ever was a Trojan Horse, it is he.
If he was so enamored with the Constitution and the rule of Law...he NEVER WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF THE DIMOCRATS.
It does not MAKE SENSE.
He is a Marxist, totally in favor of GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF OUR LIVES and anything he says is suspect.
DO NOT TRUST Dersh. And it pains me to say that.
It was either a proper or improper search - whether or not he voted for Trump is not relevant.
the burden of proof is heavily on the government to justify this intrusive search….
For years I had this belief that the burden of proof is ALWAYS on the government. You know, that whole.. innocent until proven guilty and that beyond reasonable doubt stuff.
Maybe I’m reading his comment wrong.
I’m betting that affidavit will be filled with lies just like their FISC warrants and they completely overplayed their hand.
Dershowitz says they should have enforced the subpoena. Ok. Both parties show up in court and make their case. Judge then decides who has the better argument. If it’s DOJ, Pres Trump hand the stuff over. If it’s Pres Trump, DOJ gets nothing.
a subpoena is a request before you go to court. A… pretty please.
Get a warrant and Pres Trump has to give it up and/or they come get it. Then they argue in court after the fact over the validity of the affidavit.
They probably thought they were gonna find a smoking gun. Something that would end it all. They didn’t. Now they’re screwed.
He doesn’t get it.
Voting against Trump IS voting for the people who did the political spying, the illegal investigations, the entrapments, the selling out to China, the selling out to Russia, the impeachments, the weaponization of government, the forced COVID inoculations.
You can’t be for the Constitution and vote for Fascists.
I said he votes for people who want to destroy the Constitution. He said he voted AGAINST Trump twice.
I have no idea whom he actually voted for.
He reminds me of those lefties who say they’re against abortion, but there are more important things at stake and vote for the most insane pro death leftie candidate they can. Somehow, they can justify their contradictions or they really just lie about their true beliefs in order to seem palatable.
Dersh never fails to announce that he loves Hillary.
I don’t trust him overall, but he does manage to put aside his personal feelings in favor of the Constitution. Such a paradox. Loves Hillary! Votes RAT. Understands the Constitution.
“Dersh has had nothing good to say about Hillary ...”
I have heard him often say that he loves Hillary and voted for her. I haven’t heard him recently, though, because whatever stations he must be on are stations I don’t watch.
Saying you voted against someone doesn’t necessarily mean you voted for the other main candidate. He could have written in anyone. He may be doing that lawyer speak here.
I am with you Frank on greatly mistrusting Derschbag.
The attorney chose his words ... he is quoted above as saying the search was “improper” ... that’s much different than “illegal”.
So he's against government malfeasance, but he's going to vote for someone as corrupt as dopey joe who will continue the practice - because Orange Man Bad. Got it.
Now if we can get him to understand the rest of the package.
Don’t know if it can be done some people let their mind weave in and out of strange places even they don’t know why.
Thanks for reminding us that under that shield of “Ivy League Law Professor,” there is a drooling half wit liberal that cannot break free of the chains of socialism that is in his DNA.
Yes. Next time the invading agents should sign the guest book on the stand located inside the front of the foyer.
Then Dershowitz would say it’s proper.
It is possible he didn’t vote for Hillary or Joe, but I tend
to doubt it.
He’s a known Democrat and has been for a long long time.
Until he changes parties, I wouldn’t trust the guy too
far.
It is possible he voted third party. That’s about the
farthest I can go on that.
As for lawyer speak, wouldn’t put that past him. I try
to watch what he says to look for wiggle room favoring
him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.