Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sinema Agrees to Climate and Tax Deal, Clearing the Way for Votes
New York Times ^ | Emily Cochrane

Posted on 08/04/2022 7:37:32 PM PDT by Marxmarvelous

Edited on 08/04/2022 8:13:00 PM PDT by Chris Robinson. [history]

The Arizona Democrat had been her party’s last remaining holdout on the package, now slated to move forward on Saturday and pass the Senate within days.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: agw; alteredtitle; americalast; arizona; clickbait; climatehoax; inflation; kyrstensinema; learnhowtopost; partyfirst; sidebarabuse; sinema
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

67, not 60, to override a veto.


41 posted on 08/04/2022 8:32:33 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Marxmarvelous

50 Democrats in favor + VP Harris.
50 Republicans against.

Yet we hear constantly from the cranks that there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the 2 parties.

And they will now complain about it, totally oblivious that their mentality is responsible for this result.


42 posted on 08/04/2022 8:37:07 PM PDT by nbenyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marxmarvelous

You can imagine Sinema’s growing rear end sporting a huge bulge in her back pocket. The Dems know how to do their job well.


43 posted on 08/04/2022 8:38:35 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marxmarvelous

Now I get it:

“SINEMA CAVES: Democrats Have the Votes to Pass Inflation Reduction Act

According to a report from CNN, Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema, previously a hold-out on the Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act, has agreed to support it. Dems now have the 50 votes they need to pass the bill.

Advertisement

From CNN:

In a statement, Sinema indicated that she won several changes to the tax provisions of the package, including removing the tax on carried interest, which would have impacted hedge fund managers and private equity. That proposal would have raised $14 billion.

“We have agreed to remove the carried interest tax provision, protect advanced manufacturing, and boost our clean energy economy in the Senate’s budget reconciliation legislation,” Sinema said. “Subject to the Parliamentarian’s review, I’ll move forward.”

Sinema’s support is critical given that all 50 Republicans will oppose a plan they argue would hurt the economy and cost far more than Democrats are contending — so any one Democratic defection could sink it.

“I am pleased to report that we have reached an agreement on the Inflation Reduction Actthat I believe will receive the support of the entire Senate Democratic conference,” Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said. “The final version of the Reconciliation bill, to be introduced on Saturday, will reflect this work and put us one step closer to enacting this historic legislation into law.”

This story is developing…”

https://hannity.com/media-room/sinema-caves-democrats-have-the-votes-to-pass-inflation-reduction-act/


44 posted on 08/04/2022 8:39:41 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nbenyo
50 Republicans against.

Mitch would have given them the needed votes, but he doesn't have to this time.

45 posted on 08/04/2022 8:41:22 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: nbenyo

This bill wouldn’t even be up for discussion for passage if there was just one more Republican Senator. That is reality.

well, we’re going to get 87k more IRS agents to harass Americans, not to mention the other garbage, but thank goodness that dastardly Mitch McConnell isn’t the Majority Leader.


46 posted on 08/04/2022 8:52:00 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Marxmarvelous; All
There's never been anything stopping the states from repealing the 16th (direct taxes) and 17th (citizen power to vote for federal senators) Amendments (16&17A), except for inexcusably widespread ignorance of the federal government's constitutionally limited powers as the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had intended for those powers to be understood. Thank you for referencing that article Marxmarvelous. Please note that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

"Sinema Agrees to Climate and Tax Deal, Clearing the Way for Votes"


FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

From related threads...

Regarding desparate Democratic and RINO constitutionally indefensible taxes for 2023, patriots need to start working with their Trump-endorsed state lawmaker candidates ASAP to repeal 16&17A.

Repealing 16&17A will effectively "secede" ALL the states from the unconstitutionally big federal government imo.

Once unconstitutional federal taxes (see Gibbons v. Ogden excerpt above) are permanently stopped by repeal of 16&17A, each state will ultimately find a tsunami of new revenues (imo) that can be used to increase salaries for teachers, police and fire-fighters too. And that's just for starters.

Let's also include the states maintaining their own infrastructure.

Additionally, no more forced compliance with desperate Democratic, politically correct but unconstitutional federal gender-related civil rights protections in order for school kids to eat likewise unconstitutional federal lunches paid for with stolen state revenues for example.

Again, patriots need to start working with their Trump-endorsed state lawmaker candidates ASAP to repeal 16&17A.

Insights welcome.

47 posted on 08/04/2022 8:59:42 PM PDT by Amendment10 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

I detect sarcasm in your comments


48 posted on 08/04/2022 9:00:04 PM PDT by 11th_VA (I can still remember an America where dissent was the highest form of patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Nope. No Republicans supported original BBB and it stalled.
Facts are stubborn things.


49 posted on 08/04/2022 9:00:52 PM PDT by nbenyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

But two R’s would then go ahead and vote for it in the spirit of sympathy or comity or some such nonsense.


50 posted on 08/04/2022 9:00:59 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Bus No. 2525)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

Even Maricopa couldn’t “find” enough Robeson ballots to beat Kari Lake! Hooray!


51 posted on 08/04/2022 9:02:50 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Bus No. 2525)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Might’ve had 2 more Republicans, but lots of Georgians listened to Linn Wood in 2020.


52 posted on 08/04/2022 9:05:37 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Bus No. 2525)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Old don’t care. The spending will destroy the future. Gen x, y, z are the biggest bag holders in the history of the world.

Ahem, Hub and I are old and we care a lot for our kids and grandkids futures....their well-being means the world to us!


53 posted on 08/04/2022 9:06:24 PM PDT by Dawgreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Yup, and the nutcases who followed Linn Wood in Georgia are responsible for the 49th and 50th votes for this bill.


54 posted on 08/04/2022 9:06:31 PM PDT by nbenyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Marxmarvelous

O-Body-Mortgage-Care #2


55 posted on 08/04/2022 9:06:34 PM PDT by Varsity Flight ( "War by the prophesies set before you." I Timothy 1:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Oh hogwash. The bill wouldn’t even have been discussed or brought to the floor for a vote.


56 posted on 08/04/2022 9:07:29 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Republicans need to not vote on any spending bills if they take power in 2024 and shut down the government until 2025.


57 posted on 08/04/2022 9:07:40 PM PDT by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

2022...


58 posted on 08/04/2022 9:08:14 PM PDT by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Marxmarvelous

This ought to ‘prime’ the stock market - that much money in the economy, will eventually find its way into investors pockets - I’m back in big time, to fight inflation. Good luck Gen X to Z … ; you’ll own this inflation


59 posted on 08/04/2022 9:10:15 PM PDT by 11th_VA (I can still remember an America where dissent was the highest form of patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

That is the ONLY WAY to handle this NO FUNDING, PERIOD!!! Dear Lord PLEASE grant us legislators with the balls to save this nation!! I know we don’t deserve it right now but PLEASE give us a fighting chance to change our culture back to sanity!!


60 posted on 08/04/2022 9:10:56 PM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson