Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Your attorneys messed up. You know what perjury is, right?': Alex Jones squirms as he's told his lawyers MISTAKENLY disclosed his Sandy Hook text messages which he said didn't exist - as he finally admits shooting wasn't a hoax
Daily Mail (U.K.) ^ | August 3, 2022 | Emma James

Posted on 08/03/2022 1:16:43 PM PDT by Cecily

Alex Jones appeared shocked as he was told his lawyers had accidentally handed over hundreds of text messages by mistake after he told a court that they did not exist, after admitting that the Sandy Hook massacre did happen.

The InfoWars host squirmed in his seat after confirming his phone number was linked to the texts, after previously declaring under oath at the defamation hearing that there were no messages about Sandy Hook on his phone.

Jones was horrified to discover that his team sent a digital copy of every text and email about Sandy Hook, despite declaring under oath that they didn’t exist.

Attorney Mark Banston, working for the Sandy Hook parents, revealed that they received the information 12 days ago, spanning years.

Jones called it their ‘Perry Mason’ moment during the trial, with Jones being accused of perjuring himself while giving evidence.

He previously testified that he was unable to find any emails regarding the Sandy Hook massacre, and was shocked when one was shown on screen to the court.

Jones was asked if he felt repeatedly claiming the shooting was a hoax was irresponsible, replying 'it was, especially since I've met the parents.'

He claimed he was ‘under a lot of pressure’ at the time he claimed the slayings were a hoax, adding: ‘I truly meant it when I said those statements.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: 1sidedmediacoverage; alexjones; believingmsmlies; carryingtheleftsh20; censorship; chillingfreespeech; conspiracytheorist; corporatemedia; corruptmedia; dailyfail; dailyflail; democratlawfirm; enemyofthestate; fallingforpropaganda; foolswhobelievemsm; gullibleidiotshere; infowars; j6; karma; lawfare; liar; lurker; massshooting; msmbrainwashed; perjury; rinocirclelovefest; rinogatekeeperfest; rinovirtuesignal; sandyhook; shockjock; submit2thenarrative; swallowingpropaganda; twofaced; twofacedjerk; twotierjustice; whiteknights4theleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

1 posted on 08/03/2022 1:16:43 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cecily

Jones is a lunatic.

L


2 posted on 08/03/2022 1:18:10 PM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

He’s finished.


3 posted on 08/03/2022 1:19:03 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

It seems to me that denying text messages or emails exist when they do, is a really poor strategy. Way too much chance they can be discovered.


4 posted on 08/03/2022 1:19:39 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

He’s a lunatic, but even lunatics deserve a good lawyer, instead of one who sabotages your defense.


5 posted on 08/03/2022 1:19:49 PM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Soon to be a poor lunatic.


6 posted on 08/03/2022 1:20:03 PM PDT by decal (They won't stop, so they'll have to be stopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain

“instead of one who sabotages your defense”

Withholding evidence would be actually sabotaging his defense. Turning over the evidence is the lawyers doing their job.

The lawyers did not force Jones to lie on the stand, and since it’s a civil case, they could not prevent him from being called to testify.


7 posted on 08/03/2022 1:24:11 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: decal

Well, since he’s always seemed to be a disinfo agent for the intelligence agencies, he probably has some money stashed offshore the courts won’t get to.


8 posted on 08/03/2022 1:28:12 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

He should have used a sledgehammer, or BleachBit his phone......NOTHING gets Prosecuted in THOSE situations!


9 posted on 08/03/2022 1:28:28 PM PDT by traditional2 (lets go B*and*n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

It’s that thing Bill Clinton committed and he wasn’t prosecuted for it


10 posted on 08/03/2022 1:29:41 PM PDT by AppyPappy (Biden told Al Roker "America is back". Unfortunately, he meant back to the 1970's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Hard to tell from this snippet, but in one area it says “the emails didn’t exist” - which when I first read it I took it to mean “I never sent any emails about it”.

But later it says that he searched for them and couldn’t find them. So he probably thought they were deleted, but somebody with better skills was able to find/recover them.


11 posted on 08/03/2022 1:31:07 PM PDT by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

*


12 posted on 08/03/2022 1:32:19 PM PDT by PMAS (Vote with your wallets, there are 80 million of us - No China made, No Amazon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

Don’t know that I’ve ever seen a “trial” this biased and corrupt. Jones handed over all kinds of evidence and went through multiple depositions and then the liberal Democrat judge ruled that he “withheld” info.....what exactly he supposedly withheld has never been made clear. And that therefore on the basis of this, ruled he was not allowed to put up a defense.

There’s a reason these suits were brought in Leftist Austin, Texas and in Connecticut where the plaintiffs knew they would get hopelessly biased Democrat judges who would make a mockery of the justice system - kinda like the DC courts.


13 posted on 08/03/2022 1:33:22 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

He trusts the plan too much.


14 posted on 08/03/2022 1:34:48 PM PDT by humblegunner (Ain't drownin', Just wavin'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

Sounds like he should have been doing the old “I can’t recall” all along, but he is too arrogant.


15 posted on 08/03/2022 1:36:38 PM PDT by Codeflier (I am just going to assume you are a Democrat if you call me a Putin supporter and ignore you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Turning over the evidence is the lawyers doing their job.

Yes, when all this would come out, and it eventually would, they could have been held in contempt or even endangered their licenses.

16 posted on 08/03/2022 1:41:35 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

Of course it wasn’t a hoax. Jones is a nutcase.


17 posted on 08/03/2022 1:42:01 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Кчерту Путина, Kчерту Россию)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird
The question arises: how could Jones's private text messages have harmed the defendants? The question to follow: did he broadcast his disbelief on his show? And even if he did state his disbelief, how would that have harmed the relatives of the deceased children? Granted that some of his followers may behave harassed the defendants, the blame should be on the harassers, not Jones.

The goal is to bankrupt and effectively silence Alex Jones, the 900 pound gorilla of the alternative media. Silencing Jones will also intimidate many others who hold unconventional views outside the range of acceptable viewpoints, from Fox to Huffpost.

18 posted on 08/03/2022 1:48:58 PM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cecily
Why exactly is he being sued, other than the fact that he has deep pockets? You can argue that his opinion on the incident is wrong but who was actually "harmed" by his opinion? He is not a public official or anyone who has any impact on the lives of the families.

What's next? Suing people who claim the moon landing was faked or suing people who claim that the earth is flat?

There are those who still claim that a plane did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11/01. They say it was a missile. Can the families of those who died in that crash sue those who make that claim? Say what you will about Alex Jones, but this lawsuit sets a dangerous precedent.

19 posted on 08/03/2022 1:49:56 PM PDT by American Infidel (Instead of vilifying success, try to emulate it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

Hi.

It must suck to be Jones right now.

Smart move filing Ch 7...or was it 11 for his company?

No matter. It will probably be both.

5.56mm


20 posted on 08/03/2022 1:53:39 PM PDT by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho got to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson