Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Constitution Was Literally Written By Slaveowners. Why Is America Obsessed With Upholding It?
The Root ^ | June 28, 2022 | Candace McDuffie

Posted on 06/28/2022 6:10:13 AM PDT by artichokegrower

Last week, the Supreme Court eviscerated a woman’s right to abortion, undermined Miranda rights, expanded gun rights and allowed border patrol agents to operate with even further impunity. Today, it ruled that a former Washington state high school football coach can pray on the field immediately after games—regardless of the religious backgrounds of the students.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Washington; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 1619project; 2ndamendment; abortion; banglist; blackkk; blackliesmanors; blackliesmatter; blacklivesmatter; blacktraitorsmatter; blm; california; candacemcduffie; chat; chatforum; clickbait; criticalracetheory; crt; fakenews; frpottymouths; ketanjibrownjackson; mediawingofthednc; newsforumabuse; notnews; nra; panicporn; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; paulryan; plannedparenthood; presidentharris; righttolife; roevswade; scotus; secondamendment; theroot; treason; washington; wisconsin; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-212 next last
To: artichokegrower

It does not matter that many were slaveowners.

It does not matter that all of them were White.

It does not matter that all of them were Male.

It does not matter that it was written long ago...and that the writers and ratifiers of it are long dead.

It remains current law. If you want to change it there is an amending process. Just persuade enough of your fellow citizens as to the rightness of your cause that you can get an amendment passed by each house of Congress by a 2/3rds supermajority and then 3/4 of the states ratify it. Then you can have whatever changes you want. Its as simple as that.


61 posted on 06/28/2022 6:44:48 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

The feathers might be noticable, but the tar won’t.


62 posted on 06/28/2022 6:45:12 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The firearms I own today, are the firearms I will die with. How I die will be up to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Civilization was created by slave owners. There aren’t any now.

What of it?


63 posted on 06/28/2022 6:45:50 AM PDT by Jim Noble (I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Eyeglasses were invented by Whitemen. Off with the glasses, Candace. YOU’RE APPROPRIATING WHITE CULTURE!!


64 posted on 06/28/2022 6:46:38 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Why is this POS even here? If you have a problem with our Constitution, leave. I promise that we will not mind at all.


65 posted on 06/28/2022 6:47:43 AM PDT by Howie66 (Let's Go Brandon!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

The US Constitution is the charter of our nation. No Constitution, no nation.


66 posted on 06/28/2022 6:48:02 AM PDT by Little Ray (Civilization runs on a narrow margin. What sustains it is not magic, but hard work. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

There are people who are not built for a representative republic like our’s. They just lack the intellectual capability for it.

They really should seek to live their lives somewhere else. Because if they continue to try to force us to change what we have it will come to blows.


67 posted on 06/28/2022 6:48:34 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: brookwood
George Washington's were inherited and he freed them in his will.
68 posted on 06/28/2022 6:51:25 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r
it is unfair to judge the past with today’s morality and social acumen

Today's "morality and social acumen" is decidedly inferior to that of 250 years ago. 250 years ago, they knew that men were men, that women were women, that sodomy was an abomination, that marriage was a covenant between one man and one woman, that government existed to serve the people, that killing babies was wrong, that erasing history was stupid and evil, that we are all answerable to God Almighty ... by those standards of morality and society, today's culture stands judged and condemned, and rightly so.

69 posted on 06/28/2022 6:52:09 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Yang for the Ying:

The Left is Literally Dominated by Progressives: Why are Americans so Opposed to them Usurping the US Constitution?


70 posted on 06/28/2022 6:52:34 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Even her characterization of facts are false. It is sad that someone this ignorant is spreading opinion amongst her ...community.

SCOTUS didn’t eviscerate right to abortion. They just got out of the judicial rights-creation business, and returned this issue to the democratic process.

SCOTUS did not change Miranda requirements. They said no to felons suing for damages because they weren’t Mirandized. The effects of not Mirandizing suspects remain exactly as they were.

SCOTUS ruled that a religious person could pray and others could voluntarily join in after an athletic event.

Preventing them from voluntarily praying on their own time clearly infringes the free exercise of religion.
Don’t know anything about the Border Patrol ruling, but the BP does not exactly have the upper hand on illegal immigration.

The Constitution was drafted in great part by Gouverneur Morris, an opponent of slavery, who saw it as contradictory to the whole purpose of the Constitution and the new USA. Slavery entered the Constitution as a compromise to get South Carolina to join the union — the idea that most of the delegates to the Constitutional Convention were pro-slavery is nonsense.


71 posted on 06/28/2022 6:52:55 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

“Only 2 states (Georgia and South Carolina) dug their heels in and said they wouldn’t help start the nation unless they could keep slaves.”

I reject what that woman said but you are not helping matters.

Two states could not have stopped the founding of this nation. The U.S. Constitution could have been ratified with just nine states.


72 posted on 06/28/2022 6:53:02 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

You’d think with glasses that size she’d be able to see, but that’s just an optical illusion.


73 posted on 06/28/2022 6:53:59 AM PDT by Ezekiel (🆘️ . . . - - - . . . "Come fly with US". Ingenuity -- because the Son of David begins with Mars ♂️)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I guarantee you ... she WILL notice the tar.

;’}


74 posted on 06/28/2022 6:54:52 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Ezekiel

Spiritual blindness and demonic oppression are not cured by mere optical devices.

May God grant her the grace of repentance and conversion.


75 posted on 06/28/2022 6:57:47 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Their MO is to always change the rules when they lose the game. The sibling that throws the board and game pieces screaming It’s not fair!!


76 posted on 06/28/2022 6:57:53 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

So only perfect people get to write a Constitution ir set up a government? We’ll never have one.

Meanwhile, that constitution written by some people who were slaveholders (and some were not) has produced a country that sucks so much that literally millions of people come here every year and millions more want to come here. If this idiot thinks the country is so bad because some of the people who wrote our constitution nearly 240 years ago were slaveholders, she is free to GTFO. Meanwhile, we are going to keep our constitution, ALL of it. Especially including the 2nd Amendment.


77 posted on 06/28/2022 6:58:00 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (“The right to buy weapons is the right to be free.” ― A.E. Van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Funny how these people who bitch the most about the Constitution live in the same country that allows them to bitch about the Constitution.


78 posted on 06/28/2022 6:59:01 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right
To me it's amazing that the country was thiiiisssss close to being founded as an abolitionist nation. In both the 1770's when the Declaration was being debated and signed by delegates from the 13 states, and later in the 1780's with the Constitution, 11 of the 13 states were willing to start the nation with slavery outlawed. Only 2 states (Georgia and South Carolina) dug their heels in and said they wouldn't help start the nation unless they could keep slaves.

So you are telling me that of all 13 slave states in existence at the time, all but 2 were willing to forgo slavery? This does not ring true. It sounds made up.

Further evidence? Well when Jefferson tried to make the Declaration explicitly anti-slavery, the rest of the committee overrode him and had him remove that language.

In fact, they put in a "cause" which said:

"He has incited domestic insurrections amongst us..."

And this refers to efforts to trigger a slave rebellion by offering freedom to slaves. (Lord Dunmore's proclamation.)

79 posted on 06/28/2022 7:00:16 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Agatsu77
Except for the southern the writers of the Constitution were antislavery. They had to compromise with the democrats to get the Constitution passed. Importing slaves was made illegal but the DEMOCRATS could retain those slaves THEY, THE DEMOCRATS, OWNED.
80 posted on 06/28/2022 7:00:44 AM PDT by Ronald77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-212 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson