(Chief Justice Roberts' 3,788-word salad) Concurrence SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 19–1392 THOMAS E. DOBBS, STATE HEALTH OFFICER OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al., PETITIONERS v. JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, et al.

Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute ^ | June 24, 2022 | N/A

[DoodleBob]

[AnthonySoprano]

.
News Reports were that John Roberts was upset with the Court and unhappy with the Trump appointed Judges.

[AnthonySoprano]

[Pollard]

Did you just doodle that title bob?

[Dr. Sivana]

If the Chief Justice is so concerned about limiting the scope of the judgement to the matter at hand, Roe itself should have been rendered moot as Norma McCorvey’s baby was born and adopted.

[AnthonySoprano]

.
Roberts said they went too far and their actions were “unsettling.”

.

[Hambone 1934]

His dem friends are pissed he didn’t stop this...Maybe he won’t be getting that stuffed envelope next week...

[devere]

I am guessing that Roberts’ point of view may have prevailed in this case, but the leak made that impossible. The leak made certain exactly the opposite of its intended result.

[Arcadian Empire]

I like Clarence Thomas’s statement better, which was (in effect), “Lets get rolling on overturning all past unconstitutional Supreme Court decisions”.

[AnthonySoprano]

2019

[AnthonySoprano]

.
Yes, and Yes.

.

[Paladin2]

It’s a negative concurrence.

Traitor Roberts continues to be a weasel/snake.

Is he headed back to Malta?

[Paladin2]

You Fact Checkers can be sooo disruptive.

[Antoninus]

This guy is the Bush years compressed into one human being.

[AnthonySoprano]

JOHN ROBERTS

He’s not concerned with the Constitution.

[politicket]

Hey Roberts - give me a second to prepare properly, so that you can kiss my big hairy ass!

BTW, Roberts - why aren't you married? Got a boy toy on the side?

[Paladin2]

The confirmation of Amy put Traitor Roberts just one seat to the left of being the “the decider”.

It’s the Thomas Court now.

[Republican Wildcat]

But that is all I would say, out of adherence to a simple yet fundamental principle of judicial restraint:

This was judicial restraint - acknowledging and affirming the limits of judicial power is the very definition of judicial restraint. Roe v. Wade itself was certainly the farthest thing from judicial restraint. So according to this opinion, "judicial restraint" is to uphold judicial overreach. Word salad, indeed.

[BobL]

“Roberts said they went too far and their actions were “unsettling.””

How many cities have been burned down? About all I see a relative handful of summer recess kids looking for some way to kill their time.

[Republican Wildcat]

BTW, Roberts - why aren't you married?

Roberts is married.