Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Chief Justice Roberts' 3,788-word salad) Concurrence SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 19–1392 THOMAS E. DOBBS, STATE HEALTH OFFICER OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al., PETITIONERS v. JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, et al.
Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute ^ | June 24, 2022 | N/A

Posted on 06/26/2022 8:41:04 PM PDT by DoodleBob

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Paladin2
Prove that Traitor Roberts wasn’t the leaker.

Ah, I see that this intellectually lazy type of claim is making the rounds.

“Prove that what I claim is not true”.

Good grief, how lazy.

61 posted on 06/26/2022 11:30:11 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Fury

It’s the way of the left.

The Left needs to be challenged with their logic at every opportunity.

So, how is Traitor Roberts not responsible?

Why let him off?

He claims that it is his Court.


62 posted on 06/26/2022 11:39:09 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Robert Swan Mueller III is still alive.

Why hasn’t Traitor Roberts tasked him with finding the Leaker?


63 posted on 06/26/2022 11:46:52 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano
It's after midnight at my house and I'm just scrolling through.

I'd just like to stop and say, Thank you sooo much AnthonySoprano for all you do and for taking the time to do it.

64 posted on 06/27/2022 12:43:15 AM PDT by lewislynn (The Murdochs might be citizens but they aren't true blue Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

bkmk


65 posted on 06/27/2022 2:35:57 AM PDT by sauropod (It's too bad all the people who know how to run the country are busy cutting hair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

What we have in Roberts is a judicial RINO. At his core, he is an opportunistic coward.


66 posted on 06/27/2022 3:00:02 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A Leftist can't enjoy life unless they are controlling, hurting, or destroying others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

“Don’t upset the MauMaus!”


67 posted on 06/27/2022 3:14:29 AM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Why should viability be a standard for anything?

Aborting a baby is either right or wrong, regardless of its “gestational age”.


68 posted on 06/27/2022 3:29:19 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (We are living in 1984. We have always been living in 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Oh, I love playing this game.

If Bork instead of Kennedy made his way to the Court, it is likely (but not entirely a given) that Casey would have overturned Roe.

But, Bork was weak on the 2nd Amendment and it's plausible that the Bork vote on Heller would have NOT been favorable, i.e. made it 5-4 that the militia clause makes the right to KABA a collective right.

Bork died in December 2012, and starting in January 2013 the Dems had a 55-seat majority. That means Obama's would have likely replaced Bork with that psycho Garland.

Net, net, net, notwithstanding the evil of abortion going longer than it should have, getting Borked and living with Kennedy who was replaced with Gorsuch is a Godsend. Yertle is a RINO jack wagon, but this all may have landed in a happy place.

69 posted on 06/27/2022 3:48:01 AM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

A libtard appointed by a RINO.


70 posted on 06/27/2022 3:55:57 AM PDT by Machavelli (True God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

“I am guessing that Roberts’ point of view may have prevailed in this case, but the leak made that impossible”

“That’s a pretty strong argument that the leak came from the right”

Not so sure about that. Newmax pundits have suggested it was Roberts himself that leaked it, not some Clerk. The leak just didn’t have the desired effect of having the lefts outrage intimidate one of the five Judges to change their decision.


71 posted on 06/27/2022 3:59:15 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

I’m not sure conservatives should not pursue the impeachment of John Roberts

Liberals would vote for it and it would not greatly change the court voting pattern

It would send a powerful signal for Republican appointees to stop misleading about their ideology and consistently betraying the constitutional perspective.

Republicans have a good shot to gain the presidency in 2024.


72 posted on 06/27/2022 4:43:25 AM PDT by lonestar67 (America is exceptional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Justice Roberts sucks. President GW who appointed Roberts, also sucks. I don’t recall SCOTUS exercising judicial restraint in 1973 when they turned the world on its head by creating a manufactured “rigth” to an abortion that is suggested nowhere in the text of the US Constitution.

Benedict Roberts is a complete and total, dismal failure. Without President Trump’s judicial appointments we would be so screwed.


73 posted on 06/27/2022 4:53:40 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (America -- July 4, 1776 to November 3, 2020 -- R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Here is hoping that 74 year old Thomas and 72 year old Alito live very, very long and healthy lives.


74 posted on 06/27/2022 5:06:15 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (America -- July 4, 1776 to November 3, 2020 -- R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

What we have in Roberts is a judicial RINO. At his core, he is an opportunistic coward.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
Excellent observation!


75 posted on 06/27/2022 5:06:53 AM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (Democrat politicians and voters are dangerous psychopaths. They confirm it everyday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Do Supreme Court justices refer to themselves in their opinions as often as Roberts does I’m this one?


76 posted on 06/27/2022 5:19:40 AM PDT by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

Aborting a baby is either right or wrong, regardless of its “gestational age”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Right. And since life begins at the moment of conception, human life in the USA from that very moment is guaranteed the protections of each and every provision of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. That is why, although I am happy with the Dobbs decision, it does not uphold the Constitutional guarantees of children prior to birth, or even afterward for that matter.


77 posted on 06/27/2022 5:30:01 AM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (Democrat politicians and voters are dangerous psychopaths. They confirm it everyday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833 (1992). Pet. for Cert. 5.

Am I correct in thinking that this is a case against Planned Parenthood brought by PA Senator Bob Casey SR?

The old man was one of the last pro-life Democrats and a damn sight better than his son.

78 posted on 06/27/2022 6:29:45 AM PDT by airborne (Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

If the backlash lasts 20 years, we’ll have more permissive abortion laws than today.

Incrementalism was unlikely to create the same backlash. Maybe


79 posted on 06/27/2022 7:03:25 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (I owe, I owe, it's off to work I go ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ktw

I guess ask the adoption agency - a birth mother chose them.

https://books.google.com/books?id=-PRSjeSJVggC&q=adopt#v=snippet&q=adopt&f=false


80 posted on 06/27/2022 7:40:42 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson