every ruling where the court created law instead of interpreting it should be thrown out all at once. Since EVERY DECISION like that is unconstitutional.
The issues involved are irrelevant.
What is wrong with this? That is the most clear-cut case for overturning precedent in SCOTUS history, until now.
How about Miranda and Juan Corona?
Cornyn wants to change with subject from dumping his load on the Constitution and joining Biden to pass Gun Control.
Why don’t you go back to the Dred Scott decision while you’re at it Cornholio.
Cornyn was really taken to the woodshed in Texas for his vote on gun control. Will be interesting to see how he fares on reelection
I wouldn’t put it past a Twitter employee from having posted on Cornyn’s account. Only the stupidest of Democrats (redundant, I know) would believe anyone would post something as monumentally stupid as that.
Bad court decisions should be overturned.
Plessy v Ferguson is the classic example. That second decision (Brown v Bd of Education) righted a wrong and is held in reverence by the Left.
Roe v Wade was wrong and should have been overturned.
That second decision (Dunn) righted a wrong — but is the Left arguing that you cannot have any sort of “do over”? Your first court decision must be sacrosanct and never be re-visted? Should we take this approach to Roe? To Plessy? Both? One of them? Neither?
Cornyn is inarticulate. I guess that happens when you twatter too much. He’s no constitutional scholar. He’s no conservative. He’s not America first. He is just another leftist trader to the constitution masquerading as a Republican.
The only time I can imagine showing great thanks to Mr. Cornyn, is when he resigns.
‘
Cornyn has nothing to do with Conservatives or America First.
He may have been drunk.
He’s been helping the Left.
Like Adam Kid Zinger, Swalwell, the DC Diva (Cheney), and Lindsey - it’s next to impossible to discern what they really believe because there’s so much manipulation.
I could see him saying he was hacked - like Joy Reid - and having the powers accept that because he aids the Left.
.
The point was that Plessy vs Ferguson was seen as “precedent” and overturned 50 years later by Brown vs Board.
His statement makes no sense.....Brown vs Board....overtunes Plessy...
Why would he want to “do” something that has already been done?
While Cornyn doesn’t deserve to be a senator, there’s nothing wrong with his tweet.
Either KHOU is intentionally fake news or they are idiots.
Much a do about nothing
The constitution was a brilliant diversion, a delaying tactic. Now normalcy will return. Back to nature.
“Two steps forward, one step back.”
Cornyn knows how the game is played. He just knee-capped part of the 2nd Amendment, so now he’s looking for another issue to distract from his treachery. Texans, this guy is almost as slippery as Lindsay Graham.
Don’t be fooled.
California has a carbon tax
https://www.nrdc.org/media/2007/070402
Supreme Court: Heat-Trapping Carbon Dioxide is Pollution
Rules EPA Has Power to Curb Global Warming Emissions, Repudiates White House Do-Nothing Policy
April 02, 2007
WASHINGTON (April 2, 2007) – After a four-year court battle, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled today 5-4 that carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping emissions are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act, and that the U.S. government already has authority to start curbing them.
The Supreme Court’s decision, in Massachusetts v. EPA, repudiates the Bush administration’s do-nothing policy on global warming. For years, the administration has denied carbon dioxide is an air pollutant that EPA can control under the Clean Air Act.
“Today the nation’s highest court has set the White House straight. Carbon dioxide is an air pollutant, and the Clean Air Act gives EPA the power to start cutting the pollution from new vehicles that is wreaking havoc with our climate,” said David Doniger, NRDC’s attorney in the case.
What about Alien vs Predator? Throw that out (especially part 2)
enjoy your retirement, john