Skip to comments.
Roe and Casey overruled. Roberts concurs.
SCOTUS ^
| June 24, 2022
| SCOTUSBLOG
Posted on 06/24/2022 7:14:03 AM PDT by nwrep
There is nothing in the Constitution about abortion, and the Constitution does not implicitly protect the right.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; abortion; badcall; ketanjibrownjackson; paulryan; plannedparenthood; prolife; ptl; righttolife; roevswade; roevwade; roevwadeoverturned; scotus; tenthamendment; trump; wisconsi; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 401-415 next last
To: DoodleDawg
WRONG! A bunch of states like mine have "trigger laws" in place. As of 10:00 this morning, ABORTION IS MURDER in Alabama, and a bunch of other states.
It figures that a bunch of FR pro-abort libs (like you?) would come out of the closet on this.
281
posted on
06/24/2022 8:25:00 AM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(Hold on, y'all, 2022 is going to be a ride you won't soon forget!)
To: Manic_Episode
282
posted on
06/24/2022 8:25:08 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(“We Did It Joe!” -The Taliban / “Thanks Joe!” -Putin)
To: nwrep
My mother and father who dutifully walked infront of the abortion clinic will be ecstatic in heaven....God bless them and all they did in their quiet way..
283
posted on
06/24/2022 8:25:54 AM PDT
by
cherry
(;)
To: alternatives?
It's why the Democrats hate him so much. When he does things to make himself and the GOP look more "moderate", and therefore more appealing to swing voters, the left screams that it's all a trick, and that he'll reveal his true evil genius nature when a critical issue is at stake.
And "evil" aside, they're right. He's an absolute master at maximizing power in the Senate.
To: Yo-Yo
Roberts concurs?!? I heard one explanation that Roberts agreed to uphold the Mississippi law, but opposed overturning Roe. Some are calling it a 6-3 decision and others a 5-4.
Guess the various media will get the stories straight eventually.
285
posted on
06/24/2022 8:26:13 AM PDT
by
Will88
(The only people opposing voter ID are those benefiting from voter fraud.)
To: SomeCallMeTim
Not really. Vigilance at the state level is necessary
286
posted on
06/24/2022 8:26:23 AM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: nwrep
Plus it’s murder.
No state should be permitted to legalize murder.
287
posted on
06/24/2022 8:26:33 AM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Never worry about anything. Worry never solved any problem or moved any stone.)
To: traditional2
No...if a federal law regulating abortions and allowing them across all 50 states went into effect it would not necessaritly be against the constitution. It simply takes the federal court systems out of the abortion morality business and lays the blood of murdered children more directly at the feet of the congress and the senate and the people that elected them!
288
posted on
06/24/2022 8:26:35 AM PDT
by
mdmathis6
(A horrible historic indictment: Biden Democrats plunging the world into war to hide their crimes!)
To: American Infidel
289
posted on
06/24/2022 8:27:38 AM PDT
by
Pollard
(If there's a question mark in the headline, the answer should always be No.)
To: Roadrunner383
That would be sweet indeed!
290
posted on
06/24/2022 8:27:49 AM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(Hold on, y'all, 2022 is going to be a ride you won't soon forget!)
To: Lurker
Now do 80% of the rest of the Federal Government.This was literally a baby step in that direction...
291
posted on
06/24/2022 8:28:25 AM PDT
by
null and void
(If I had a buck for every girl that found me unattractive, they would eventually find me attractive!)
To: American Infidel
“I see it being very limited in Florida but not totally banned”
I think you underestimate my supergovernor my friend.....but we will see.
Also,
“Trying to help keep TN as it is politically”
I heard the same thing from a Oregon refugee here recently....the number of out of state license plates just in my town alone is ridiculous.
I hope you left your NJ driving habits in nj. :^)
292
posted on
06/24/2022 8:28:40 AM PDT
by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave)
To: backwoods-engineer
293
posted on
06/24/2022 8:28:56 AM PDT
by
Pollard
(If there's a question mark in the headline, the answer should always be No.)
To: DoodleDawg
You’re forgetting Wickard v Filburn, which virtually destroyed states’ rights as regards commerce. That one needs to be overturned, too.
294
posted on
06/24/2022 8:29:00 AM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(Hold on, y'all, 2022 is going to be a ride you won't soon forget!)
To: Major Matt Mason; dfwgator
True, dem(on) states will allow it. BUT:
1. When elections get clean, many blue states will miraculously turn red.
2. The fedgov will not be able to fund any abortion orgs at all. No PP, no abortion on mil facilities, ecetc. So that takes away a lot of incentive right there.
3. Out of state would=be baby killers will have a bit more trouble than if they could drive down the block. Can’t think at the moment what kind, but, for instance, a a would be baby-killer is on the state cheapie health insurance, she wouldn’t be able to use that in another state, most likely.
295
posted on
06/24/2022 8:29:56 AM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Never worry about anything. Worry never solved any problem or moved any stone.)
To: mewzilla
That isn’t what that War was about, sweetcakes. Read some history (not Yankee propaganda).
296
posted on
06/24/2022 8:29:57 AM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(Hold on, y'all, 2022 is going to be a ride you won't soon forget!)
To: fatima
I'm so grateful that this happened in my lifetime. Now I would like to see History repeat itself.
"At one time, circa 1900, abortion was illegal in ALL STATES."
That would be the hope our forefathers intended..a moral society.
To: patriotspride
There are other reasons why they want to murder at will. We all know “the plans for the Great Reset…us being useless eaters and all…”
298
posted on
06/24/2022 8:30:35 AM PDT
by
Shady
(The #JihadJunta: "We are now a nation of Men, Not of Laws. You are not as equal as we are...")
To: Sacajaweau
He stays until the end of his term and she will replace him then. Unless he resigns. With all the decisions released and the work of the court done it's possible that Breyer may retire over the summer and give Jackson a chance to prep for the upcoming session - hire staff, recruit interns, etc. I think that is not an unlikely scenario.
To: Pollard
300
posted on
06/24/2022 8:37:33 AM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(Hold on, y'all, 2022 is going to be a ride you won't soon forget!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 401-415 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson