Posted on 06/20/2022 12:37:52 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
SALEM, Ore. — An independent group of scientists representing Oregon, Washington, and other western states has signed off on the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines for children as young as 6 months old.
The Western States Scientific Safety Review Workgroup on Sunday completed its review of safety and efficacy data and the CDC advisers' recommendation that coronavirus vaccines should be opened to children in that age group.
The vaccines now available to children in the youngest age group are the Moderna two-dose series and the Pfizer three-dose series.
The Western States Scientific Safety Review Workgroup is made up of scientists representing Oregon, Washington, Nevada, and California. They are tasked with reviewing COVID-19 recommendations from the federal government.
(Excerpt) Read more at katu.com ...
Pfizer bribes.
Crazy or they’re i
On bribes
That means schools and day cares in the blue areas of those places will mandate it, local blue governments will mandate it. Entire blue states may mandate it. In the name of school health, childrens’ safety. It’s for the children.
Bill Gates’ depopulation plan is on the march.
What about the infants? /sarc
My wife’s cousin’s 18 year old daughter was taken to the emergency room with stroke symptoms. She had the poison shot.
How many more deaths do they want to add to the vaxxed people?
It’s mandated in the colleges here already, even though the shots do nothing to reduce transmission.
Prostitutes, not scientists.
One benefit is that recent years have shown us just how many venal frauds wear the cloak of “science”. It’s invoked just like pagan priests used to invoke various gods.
Idiots. The adverse reactions will kill far more than a virus that’s almost played out.
Insanity?? I will go with PURE EVIL instead
I agree, pure insanity.
This is just an excerpt as the whole article is pretty long but can be found on the internet if you are interested. Looks like they are working very diligently to making it become a reality.
2025 Deagel Forecast: 70% Population Reduction In USA And The Collapse Of The West
by Doug Casey
Deagel is a private online source for the military capabilities of the world’s nation-states. It recently released a shocking five-year forecast.
The report analyzes countries by projected population size, GDP, defense budget, and more.
In it, they predict a 70% reduction in the size of the United States population. This is a bold prediction. What are your thoughts on this?
Doug Casey: I’ve got to say that I wasn’t familiar with Deagel — it keeps a low profile. Deagel is in the same business as Jane’s — which has been in the business of analyzing weapons systems for many decades.
A look at the Deagel website, which is quite sophisticated, makes it clear we’re not dealing with some blogger concocting outrageous clickbait. It seems to be well-connected with defense contractors and government agencies like the CIA.
They’ve predicted that about 70% of the US population, and about the same percentage in Europe, is going to disappear by 2025. It’s hard to believe that anybody in their position would make a forecast like that. There’s no logical business reason for it, especially since it was done before the COVID hysteria gripped the world. It stretches a reader’s credulity.
Could it possibly happen? It would be the biggest thing in world history. Does it have a basis in reality, or is it just some bizarre trolling exercise?
I’m not sure — it’s hard to take almost anything from any source at face value these days. But for the last several years, I’ve been saying that World War III would basically be a biological war. Of course, it will have substantial conventional, nuclear, space-based, and AI/computer elements as well, but its most serious component will be biological.
Essentially, it will involve the use of bacteria and viruses to wipe out the enemy. The odds are that it will be between the US and China. But since anyone with a CRISPR in their garage can hack the genome and DNA of almost anything and anybody… there are no limits to the possibilities.
Certainly, from the Chinese point of view, a biological war makes all the sense in the world. That’s because the Han Chinese share a lot of genetic similarities. Presumably, a bacteria or virus can be bred to favor the Chinese and take out most everybody else. The fact is that anything that can be done eventually will be done. It’s just the law of large numbers.
Somebody might respond, “Well, that’s horribly racist.” Of course it’s racist. Notwithstanding rational and philosophical arguments against it, all ethnic groups and countries are quite naturally racist. A fear of different racial and ethnic groups has been bred into humans, as a survival mechanism, over the hundreds of thousands of years since we became biologically modern.
All races and ethnic groups like to think that they’re “the best” or the most worthy, and that non-members are “other”, perhaps only marginally human. Biological warfare plays directly into feeling.
Americans who — like everybody else — see themselves as “the good guys”, believe we’re immune to that. However, don’t forget that the US pioneered modern biowarfare.
Fort Detrick, Maryland, has been an epicenter of it for over 70 years, and there are undoubtedly many other more clandestine sites where US government agencies are working on biological warfare. No doubt the Chinese and other major powers are working clandestinely as well. It’s not something anybody wants to advertise for many reasons.
What shocks me is not that a biowar is being researched or even actively wargamed, but that a connected organization like Deagel is actually saying it publicly. It’s not like what goes on in the spook community is an open book.
Deagel doesn’t explicitly say what, exactly, will cause the great die-off. But there are many advantages to biological warfare over other types of warfare, so it will probably be featured. It’s probably inevitable, now that the technology has made it practical.
What are the advantages of biowar? What might wargaming generals like about it?
First, it doesn’t destroy materiel. That’s a huge plus. After all, what’s the point of conquering a country if all you have to show for it is a smoking radioactive ruin? That’s the major advantage of the neutron bomb, of course; it kills the people but limits damage to buildings. Bioweapons essentially make atomic weapons obsolescent.
Second, bioweapons can be structured to attack only certain racial groups. That’s potentially either a big advantage or disadvantage to China. The diverse population of the US could also be either an advantage or a disadvantage, depending on who strikes first. But, on the bright side, you can perhaps immunize your own population, or at least the military and “essential” workers, to control the damage.
Third, bioweapons are very cheap and easy to fabricate. Anyone with access to a good high school chemistry lab is in business. There’s no need for expensive and tricky U-235 or, for that matter, any of the junk toys the Pentagon spends hundreds of billions on.
Fourth, bioweapons don’t need sophisticated delivery systems; again, no need for B-2s, B-52s, cruise missiles, ICBMs, or any of that. A sick tourist or two, or a few
I know a lot of idiots who agree...they looooove those awesome shots.
Agree.
Interesting how there is a baby formula shortage, but, no shortage of these horrid $hots.
Good post.
And, don’t forget, approving these horrid $hots, for kids, offers Pharma indemnity.
:-(
Front Line Doctors have developed a protocol for the treatment of Post-Vaccine Syndrome.
6/20/2022 | America's Frontline DoctorsPosted on 6/20/2022, 1:12:41 PM by ransomnote
[H/T COUNTrecount]
But if we force the babies to get the shot, there won’t be a baby formula shortage when they all die, sounds like a Win Win for a Demonrat
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.