Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court ‘Draft’ Decision on Roe v. Wade LEAKED – Fingers Quickly Point at Potential Culprit
24News ^ | 05/02/2022 | Samantha Foster

Posted on 05/02/2022 8:21:10 PM PDT by montag813

by Samantha Foster | 24News

The U.S. Supreme Court is apparently planning to vote to END Roe v Wade in a DRAFT OPINION by Justice Samuel Alito — leaked to Politico this evening.

The draft opinion was leaked to the press – something that is almost unprecedented.

Developing………
The Daily Mail reported:

The Supreme Court is planning to vote to strike down the decision of Roe v. Wade, long considered a vanguard of guaranteeing a right to an abortion in the United States.

The opinion draft – originally obtained by Politico – was written by Justice Samuel Alito, one of the six justices appointed by Republican presidents on the nine-member court, repudiating both Roe and the 1992 Planned Parenthood vs. Casey decision.

‘Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,’ Alito writes. ‘We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,’ he continues in the document, titled ‘Opinion of the Court.’

‘It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.’

Politico noted that this is the first such case in modern history of a Supreme Court draft decision being leaked to the public while the case was still pending.

It is unclear which justice would support such a move, which would typically be released at term's end -- by June.

But the fact that the planned decision was LEAKED -- which is considered a criminal act -- is almost as big a story as the decision, and it has shocked Court experts.

Influential site SCOTUSblog expressed the sentiment bluntly:

And it didn't take long for fingers to point at the most far-left justice on the Court: Sonia Sotomayor.

(Excerpt) Read more at us24news.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; again; amitjain; andagain; andagainandagain; babykillershateblogs; bidenvoters; brakingnews; brakingnudes; leak; leakedagain; notthisagain; scotus; scotusleak; sonia; soniasotomayor; sotomayor; thankyoutrump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-206 next last
To: montag813

My first thought is it was leaked to attempt to cause a reversal of the vote via violence by the left.

I think we are about to see a “Summer of Love”


141 posted on 05/03/2022 3:39:26 AM PDT by stockpirate (Where Justice Ends Tyranny Begins...Repression Breeds Violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan _in_Arkansas

Proclaiming to be wise, they became fools.


142 posted on 05/03/2022 4:14:26 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

As Chief Justice, Roberts clearly has lost control of the Court justices staff.


143 posted on 05/03/2022 4:22:57 AM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade

Yes. This nation has slid into anarchy.


144 posted on 05/03/2022 4:24:42 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu
“...But the fact that the planned decision was LEAKED — which is considered a criminal act ...”

What do you mean 'considered a criminal act'?

It is either a crime which violated a written law or not.

You win stupid post of the week and it's only Tuesday.

Send me $14,865.27 and I will send you your prize, honest, you can consider that a promise.

145 posted on 05/03/2022 4:26:42 AM PDT by USS Alaska (NUKE ALL MOOSELIMB TERRORISTS, NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Prince of Space

Re: 125 - I read somewhere, that the WSJ based on their article of last week, may also be in possession of the draft.


146 posted on 05/03/2022 4:34:43 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Sonya should be expelled from the Court immediately. Period.


147 posted on 05/03/2022 4:49:25 AM PDT by Shady (The #JihadJunta: "We are now a nation of Men, Not of Laws. You are not as equal as we are...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
The best thing that could happen now is for the vote to go 9-0.

I wouldn't be surprised in the least if the leaders and protesters think this will cause a mistrial even though it's a post decision document, albeit a draft one.

I also wouldn't be all that surprised if somehow that's what happens.

148 posted on 05/03/2022 4:59:44 AM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: montag813

And just think, overturning Roe v Wade doesn’t change much, it certainly doesn’t “outlaw abortion” across the US like the hysterical, ignorant masses believe. But hey it’s another change to rip America apart (America’s new favorite pastime?) and Biden can try to boost his low poll ratings. Get lives people.


149 posted on 05/03/2022 5:17:07 AM PDT by Vision (Elections are one day. Reject "Chicago" vote harvesting. Election Reform Now. Obama is an evildoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

If she’s dead, she can’t participate in the final decision

She has forfeited her right to live


150 posted on 05/03/2022 5:26:44 AM PDT by bert ( (KW?E. NP. N.C. +12) Promoting Afro Heritage diversity will destroy the democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30; Cboldt
If a Supreme Court justice leaks a decision, is that impeachable?

Will Biden make an announcement like "Alito will pay?" as he did when he announced the "BP whipping immigrants" hoax?

151 posted on 05/03/2022 5:34:29 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Biden will lament the supposed decision, is about it.

I wonder if ALL the justices first draft an opinion styled as “Opinion of the Court” then after reading each other’s submissions, meet to discuss.

The court is so arrogant that I just can’t believe it would ever admit Roe/Casey were fundamentally wrong, conjuring a federal authority out of thin air. “Sorry, we were hallucinating.”


152 posted on 05/03/2022 5:39:28 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
They may have to get the Easter Bunny to restrain him again.

Coney Barrett is on video before being on the court, saying that SCOTUS will not overturn Roe v Wade. One problem is that when politicians or the media say "Roe v Wade," it really is an oversimplification of that decision and several others (Doe v Bolton, which allowed abortions after viability ).

153 posted on 05/03/2022 6:12:21 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

We need March for Life Plus, to counter protest these paid rent-a-lib mobs.


154 posted on 05/03/2022 6:23:44 AM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: montag813

It was not a “leak”. It was a call to arms for the demon army.


155 posted on 05/03/2022 6:29:33 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

...chocolate mooch!


156 posted on 05/03/2022 6:37:47 AM PDT by gr8eman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska; hanamizu

You win stupid post of the week and it’s only Tuesday.

Send me $14,865.27 and I will send you your prize, honest, you can consider that a promise.


Only, the person you made that rude statement to, didn’t even say that. They were replying to the poster who said that.

Now, don’t you look foolish….and, rude?


157 posted on 05/03/2022 6:38:43 AM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS
We apparently now have leftist activist SC Justices that will call out their street armies if a decision is going against them.

Democrats lack integrity - it was only a question of time before they compromised the Supreme Court.

158 posted on 05/03/2022 6:38:51 AM PDT by GOPJ ("The party that says men can get pregnant wants to control 'misinformation' on the internet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

Very true!


159 posted on 05/03/2022 6:39:21 AM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

“If a Supreme Court justice leaks a decision, is that impeachable?”

If we had a Congress with a spine it would be. Maybe after the midterms. One can dream.


160 posted on 05/03/2022 6:46:47 AM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson