Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zuckerberg money won’t be in next round of aid for elections
The Associated Press ^ | April 11, 2022 | By NICHOLAS RICCARDI (D-AP)

Posted on 04/11/2022 3:12:46 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

DENVER (AP) — The nonprofit that distributed most of the $350 million in donations from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg to election offices in 2020 said Monday that it won’t disburse similar donations this year after backlash from conservatives suspicious that the contributions tilted the outcome of the presidential race toward Joe Biden.

Instead, the Center for Technology and Civic Life is launching a different program. Dubbed the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence, the $80-million, five-year effort is intended to create a network for the nation’s thousands of local election officials, who can apply for aid to improve their technology and processes.

The 2020 effort by Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, amid the COVID-19 pandemic fueled conservative anger and distrust of the presidential election outcome. At least eight GOP-controlled states passed laws last year banning private donations to election offices in reaction to Zuckerberg’s donations. Suspicion that the contributions — routinely referred to as “Zuckerbucks” by conservatives — helped Biden, a Democrat, has become a staple among those who believe in former President Donald Trump’s election lies.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election2020; facebook; mailballots; votefraud; zuckerberg; zuckerbucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 04/11/2022 3:12:46 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

So now they’ll make an encrypted network so that no one can catch them


2 posted on 04/11/2022 3:13:53 PM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

We didn’t do anything wrong and we won’t do it again. Yeah, right.


3 posted on 04/11/2022 3:14:48 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

More likely Zuk knows it won’t save the RATS this time.
He is going to save it for ‘24 if things improve for them.


4 posted on 04/11/2022 3:15:09 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

We all know what they did so now they don’t have to operate in secrecy!


5 posted on 04/11/2022 3:16:39 PM PDT by 100%FEDUP (I'm seeing RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Just changing the name and changing the way it works amounts to doing the exact same thing. They must think that we are really stupid.


6 posted on 04/11/2022 3:19:38 PM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Zuckerberg thinks he’s so much more clever than his customers.


7 posted on 04/11/2022 3:21:19 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Instead, the Center for Technology and Civic Life is launching a different program. Dubbed the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence, the $80-million, five-year effort is intended to create a network for the nation’s thousands of local election officials, who can apply for aid to improve their technology and processes.”

How can this be legal?

I don’t understand how an election can even use proprietary software.


8 posted on 04/11/2022 3:24:39 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Oh good, they changed the name. Of course it won’t be a DNC laundry for Zuckerbucks.


9 posted on 04/11/2022 3:24:57 PM PDT by bray (The Vax is fake and deadly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

I’m sure the money will be distributed evenly , politically speaking😂


10 posted on 04/11/2022 3:29:44 PM PDT by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

We’re not suspicious, we know that money was used to steal the election.


11 posted on 04/11/2022 3:32:18 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin ( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Zuckerberg’s money really did throw the whole election


12 posted on 04/11/2022 3:36:07 PM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I don’t know which line is funnier - they won’t do it again, or they are reacting to backlash from conservatives.

They’ll just have to be a little more careful this time around.


13 posted on 04/11/2022 3:47:17 PM PDT by JudyinCanada (Maranatha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

His “money” may not be there - but that’s not the problem - the systemic access that allowed such direct infiltration and manipulation must be shut down.


14 posted on 04/11/2022 3:57:08 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The body of the article contradicts the headline. Zuck is still very much in the business of buying elections; he just wants to be more convert about it.


15 posted on 04/11/2022 4:15:40 PM PDT by eclecticEel ("The petty man forsakes what lies within his power and longs for what lies with Heaven." - Xunzi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Zuckerberg has already donated about 60 million to stymie the investigation of he use of money he put into the 2020 election.


16 posted on 04/11/2022 4:22:40 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If you go to the page of the ‘Center for Technology and Civic Life’ and look under Careers and pull up their job application you will see that the ‘Pronouns’ field is mandatory. I wonder what type of person they are interested in recruiting.


17 posted on 04/11/2022 4:34:15 PM PDT by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

That’s typical of what they do and have done...for decades.

CHANGE THE NAME, CHANGE THE MESSAGE, CHANGE THE SHORTS AND COME BACK ALL REFRESHED.

If that works again, in any election, WE SHOULD BE ARRESTED...FOR BEING STUPID.


18 posted on 04/11/2022 4:40:27 PM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
after backlash from conservatives suspicious that the contributions tilted the outcome of the presidential race toward Joe Biden.

It may have, and probably did tilt some of the down-ticket races, but the presidential race was changed using voter fraud. (IMO, mail-in voting was the major source of the fraud.)

19 posted on 04/11/2022 5:07:31 PM PDT by libertylover (Our BIGGEST problem, by far, is that most of the media is hate & agenda driven, not truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

not because of the goodness of zuckerberg’s heart as AP claims, but because a whole slew of states subsequently outlawed private funding of election offices ...


20 posted on 04/11/2022 6:33:16 PM PDT by catnipman (In a post-covid world, ALL "science" is now political science: stolen elections have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson