Skip to comments.
Judge finds Trump 'more likely than not' committed felony obstruction in effort to overturn election
AP ^
Posted on 03/28/2022 9:46:03 AM PDT by janetjanet998
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
They are desperate to stop him for 2024
To: janetjanet998
2
posted on
03/28/2022 9:47:08 AM PDT
by
Allegra
To: janetjanet998
Sorta, kinda, maybe, for sure.
3
posted on
03/28/2022 9:47:53 AM PDT
by
John 3_19-21
(Silly people think they can comply their way back to freedom.)
To: janetjanet998
Let me get this straight. Trump was asking for investigations and that is obstructing justice?
4
posted on
03/28/2022 9:48:44 AM PDT
by
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
To: janetjanet998
A just casts a verdict in a case where Trump is not even being tried directly.
How much more inappropriate can it get?
5
posted on
03/28/2022 9:49:43 AM PDT
by
fwdude
(Every time I see someone voluntarily masked in public, I know I'm looking at a vaccinated person.)
To: janetjanet998
So a mugger beats you and if you try to take him to court, you obstruct justice. What a crock by this lawless regime. And I hate the Asspress more than I have words to describe.
6
posted on
03/28/2022 9:51:14 AM PDT
by
Luke21
To: janetjanet998
Let me guess. An Obama appointee.
7
posted on
03/28/2022 9:51:19 AM PDT
by
HighSierra5
(The only way you know a commie is lying is when they open their pieholes.p)
To: Allegra
To: Allegra
To: janetjanet998
"more likely than not"
The new standard for justice. Innocent until proven guilty is so over rated.
10
posted on
03/28/2022 9:53:06 AM PDT
by
JoSixChip
(2020: The year of unreported truths; 2021: My main take away from this year? Trust no one.)
To: janetjanet998
Trump was not trying to “overturn” the election. That is begging the question and works on the assumption that Biden’s vote was legitimate. Trump was trying to correct the fraud.
11
posted on
03/28/2022 9:53:35 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(“...we would live very well without Facebook."-B.LeMaire)
To: Allegra
Probably that same guy that sat on the bench for Gen. Flynn.
12
posted on
03/28/2022 9:54:08 AM PDT
by
JoSixChip
(2020: The year of unreported truths; 2021: My main take away from this year? Trust no one.)
To: janetjanet998
Isn’t this prejudice an excuse to get a new judge. Might be intentional on the judge’s part to get out of a situation?
13
posted on
03/28/2022 9:54:09 AM PDT
by
PeterPrinciple
(Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
To: Allegra
The Judge is David Carter. He was appointed by Clinton.
Regarding Carter:
“A U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel vacated an order issued by U.S. District Judge Judge David Carter in April that set out a swift timeline for the city and county to shelter people in Skid Row who were experiencing homelessness, as well as to put $1 billion into escrow to address homelessness and conduct audits.”
14
posted on
03/28/2022 9:54:40 AM PDT
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis )
To: janetjanet998
Judge finds Trump 'more likely than not' committed felony obstruction in effort to overturn electionMore Likely Than Not?:
![](https://floodsofjustice.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/kangaroo-court-1.jpg)
More Likely Than Not!
15
posted on
03/28/2022 9:54:40 AM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Celebrate Decivilization)
To: janetjanet998
“More likely than not”
Sounds conclusive.
16
posted on
03/28/2022 9:54:49 AM PDT
by
struggle
To: janetjanet998
They are desperate to nail him with some sort of “insurrection” charge. He can’t run in 2024 (or any other year) if they can ram through a verdict.
17
posted on
03/28/2022 9:54:54 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
("Believe all women" has become "I don't know what a woman is".)
To: HighSierra5
.
Is this the Wild, Activist Judge that has gone after Trump 20 times?
This guy loathes Trump and is a big DEM Activist:
Amit Mehta
I don’t know if it’s him, but it sounds like his work.
.
.
18
posted on
03/28/2022 9:55:16 AM PDT
by
AnthonySoprano
(Cornpop was a bad dude)
To: janetjanet998
Not the standard for a crime, but for a civil case.
19
posted on
03/28/2022 9:55:41 AM PDT
by
SgtHooper
(If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
To: Anti-Bubba182; TexasGurl24
20
posted on
03/28/2022 9:55:46 AM PDT
by
Allegra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson